serious_chat
Discord ID: 356277119862439937
6,335 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 4/26
| Next
If they mass produce sex robots and artificial wombs they will save the white race
So yes
Good plans haha
The white race lulz
Can someone record the debate for me?
@somerussianguy this is why they can't assimilate
@Niles read article above this is why civic nationalism doesn't work
Look at all the underground shit that went on in WW2
You think the potent, organized anti-Nazi shit would happen in multicultural society?
Fuck no
waht the frick
who deleted that
@!Co-Owner! I did, keep this chat serious about topics and what not
Put that in <#356277996274843658>
you're assuming that it is banter
if cali secedes the dems will never win an election again ever
^^
oh that ping said catalonia
i thought it said california LUL
my original statement still stands though
Subversion defeats leftists
imo the reason white people are dying out is because they are generally in rich areas and are generally responsible. there are only rare instances where they will pop out more children than they can feed
whereas in africa/southeast asia/me that pretty much always happens
then they blame the US or something because they are miserable
i guess its not so much dying out as being out grown
2016 births for White non-Hispanic origin was 1,779,252. 13.4% nonWhite births are counted as White. The pew research institute shows the number of Arabs living in America, the number of Jews, and the number of biracial children born of a White non-Hispanic origin mother. The CDC births gives numbers based on the race of the mother and not if the child. So to get this number I used other data to offset what is presented in CDC births. For some reason deaths by race for 2015 and 2016 has not been release yet. But based off the the trend the death toll has gone up. That means we have had for the 5th year in the row more deaths than births. The data shows only 45.1% of births are White non-Hispanic origin. We were not the majority births. In 2012 was the first time we had more deaths than births. Every year since than we have had a increase deaths and a decrease in births due to the aging population and a low birthrate. The US population was estimated to be 313,914,040 total. Today is Oct. 1, 2017 and the US population is estimated to be 326,000,558. When you compare the births to deaths for all you see the majority of 12,086,518 is from immigration. I took pics of the sources and put them in the link.
https://imgur.com/gallery/CnUCU
yup white people give birth at a lower rate due to what i mentioned
I disagree. I believe they are giving less births because of psychological warfare since the 60s and then some. Here is some evidence. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/statab/t981x01.pdf
You can see the turning point. White births was going up until 1959 then it started going down. That was the time of cultural Marxism and the sexual revolution took root.
@tsuke ^^^^^
whats this genocide thing about?
you are making the assumption that a male is only comprised of his Y chromosome
you lose half of yourself regardless
so it falls on the heads of everyone if thats what you are arguing about
why are normal users allowed here
i seriously disagree with that though
our haven is now broke
what
@xX NegroSaki Samurai Xx whom broke the haven
i did
reahsons
what
no
Are you offended I can talk in the same chat as you?
yes
Aren't you special
stop this low quality discussion
i cleaned it for you
move it to <#350739775214583812> or <#356277996274843658>
Births everywhere went up before 1959. That was the baby boom era.
Comparing birth rates from an era where it was much much higher than normal isn't really productive. Itd make literally anything else look worse
Any of them holocaust deniers herw?
ahem
yes @KZ
What parts do you guys take issue with?
the numbers might have been exaggerated
the 'gas chambers' might have been not gas chambers at all and used for other purposes
the corpses that were found might have been of those who had died due to some diseases due to the conditions
that's only scratching the surface
What were they using all the zyclon B for?
And why did they blow up the โgasโ chambers at Birkenau as the Russians approached?
ok hi
i take issue with quite a lot
I don't know
Not gonna lie
I don't know if any of this is true, what is and what isn't
And we'll probably never know for sure
But the mere fact that it's the only forbidden thing to deny even just verbally and with serious punihment for that
makes me question everything there
the reasoning, the numbers etc
Iโm genuinely curious
the treatment of prisoners etc
I went to Auschwitz and Birkenau yesterday
mhm
all the while denying or undermining holodomor is pretty okay and quite common
I donโt see how thatโs relevant
the jews were ruling over the ussr during holodomor and other things, mowing down russian, ukranian folk, etc
What doth life?
Didnโt jews get shor
Shot
And buried in mass graves
So while I was at work I saw a guy with an 82nd airborne hat from 50-53 didn't get the chance to ask if he was in Korea but someone else walked in who had a Korean war veteran hat on and I told him about the other hat I saw
He told me how he didn't have an education or a home to live in and when he was 17 joined up, and how they'd given him clothes food and 40 odd dollars a week and he felt like he was in heaven
He said he remembers when he landed on Sept 19 down to the exact time and that the only time he saw a bed was when he went to a whorehouse in japan
He was there on the Chinese NK border when China joined in
Figured I'd share it here, interesting story he gave me
@Polygon Thanks m8
Motive?
Of the shooter I mean
Do we know yet?
@๐Boo-ton๐ ๐ณ ๐ด
Trump presser tonight
@everyone add a new news feed channel, shit at staying informed
@๐Boo-ton๐ far as i can tell, the closest thing to a red flag are gambling addiction and having an america's most wanted criminal as a dad
If they find anything, it will be on that laptop and the hard drives they confiscated
But there is literally no gun control law that could have prevented this. Only better security measures could possibly mitigate something like this
Mental health
Iโm telling yโall, mental health was a big campaign promise on guns
All this talk about guns, and nobody taking bets of Spanish civil war 2.0?
Catalonia will be an independent republic in a day or two
then it'll be promptly annexed by spain
incredible that there is still no confirmed motive
Could be a crazy guy
Why do you think those Cho did what he did
What is the average age of people in this thing?
12
I have an eerie feeling I'm mostly attempting discourse with children
what would be the motive of a retired millionaire who did not make it clear what his goal was @๐Boo-ton๐
besides mental illness
Check the pol anon
yea im not going on 4chan buddy
thicc
daily reminder to get trained in first aid.
discussion about People in the United Kingdom could face up to fifteen years in prison for repeatedly viewing "far-right propaganda" or "terrorist material" online.
civil war coming?
no need
repealing SALT deductions destroys democrats already
single most important thing trump can do
thats a dumb argument
USA has gun control.
AUS is just better at it
saying that civilians are at a disadvantage to criminals with guns is stupid. you got a gun and you not a farmer or a hobby shooter. you a criminal. you a criminal. you get jailed or shot. if a law abiding citizen is hanging around criminals. thats their fault.
and if a law abiding citizen is caught in cross fire between criminals that just comes down to shit happens
what?!
*Would you rather $200 be spent on a gun, which goes to helping tax paying citizens stay employed and help American businesses, or would you prefer that guns go up to $10,000 and allowing cartels to get a new source of revenue?*
yeah then you really must have to wanna kill the shit outa someone to be spending 10k on a gun
well i mean if you hit a bird while driving we arent gunna build glass domes over roads to protect birds....shit happens
and if you still typing away at the USA has gun control thing. well if they didnt you wouldnt have to get a background check
1) having guns automatically makes one a criminal?
2) if government (or anyone rich and powerful enough) ever wanted to, they could (and are doing this if it's beneficial) frame any law-abiding citizen and he would suddenly be considired a criminal
3) when regular citizens can have guns, they can actually protect themselves;
often police can't; criminals are less likely to mess with such citizens
I would tell you to kys, but it's against the rules, so I'm not telling you to kys.
But I would very much like to!
1) Unless a farmer or a hobby (hunter or target) / olympic style shooter.
2) that lands under shit happens. govs and rich people are framing cunts all the time. its just the world we live in with rich people running the world.
3.a) I mean why bother with police.. You should just get to shoot a crim and drop em off at the morgue and say "tried to rape mah daughter"
3.b) That's just fear talking. if you cant trust your law enforcement or where you live to not be assaulted by someone then you should move somewhere safer where you dont need a gun to protect from crims.
You are an asshole, you type to slow.
(2 and further) - it means you can never be 100% sure in government or police, or anything for that matter. no matter where it is.
but you should be able to protect yourself, your home, your family at all times *on your own*
You've been typing this for quite a while as well.
True.
It's called a gate.
with a padlock
"aw but but they can climb"
yes they can, but i can also poke, poke them off my damn fence
why are you so opposed to this?
it's my land and my property
i should be able to do whatever I can to protect it
im bored. I actually would love a gun or 2 to protect myself against a tyranical government
have you been trolling me?
lil bit. but not really. but a lil bit
those are my aussie views
but my personal views are diff
like whenever there is a shooting somewhere im kinda quick to say "well if those people had guns....."
"...maybe there wouldnt have been a shooting"
but as an aussie, im able to sit here and only really worry about getting stabbed in my sleep if i forget to lock my door. rather then shot walking the street/down the wrong neighborhood
yet
at the same time though. I dont believe if i have a problem with my government and go to express myself to the point where military is turned on me then yeh
I mean, until now
You never know what tomorrow may bring
๐คท๐ป
nice trolling by the way
good job
trolling is a art ๐
but was more arguing for boredoms sake
The Aussie rules don't apply to the Us
We have so many guns, banning them would not stop a criminal from having access at all
Banning guns would actually make them a lot easier to get for criminals, because law abiding citizens would rush to get rid of their now illegal guns
Making it much easier for them to end up on the black market or in a criminals hands
The only thing that would do is make it so the only people with access to guns are criminals and the government
Fucking over the everyday citizen
yeah but its this idea that you constantly need to be protected.
its silly
plus criminals would be too poor to buy guns
unless you like cartel or some shit then you only really need guns vs cops
and other gangs
but as a said. citizen getting caught in crossfire of gang violence is just a mishap.
if they ended up on the black market they would become SO much more exspensive no common street nigger would be able to buy one
no matter how many points of coke he sells to support his habbit
like...idk...you are right the aussie rules dont apply, we dont live in a state of constant fear and terror that the need for mass amounts of guns and ammo are a must.
we didnt have slaves try to revolt or a civil war because we disagreed about our slaves. so we wont ever really get the feeling of being super scared that our neighbor is gunna shoot the shit outa us
We are not Australia
lol exactly
I donโt stockpile
Many donโt
many dont. but many do
In fact many who do want to sell them in case gun grabbers come around
But the 2A is more than for protection, t is a bunch of other things too
everyone should get 1 gun with a 3 bullets. and thats it
Thatโs stupid
how is the 2A more than just protection?
Hunting
Sport shooting
...
But who are you to question someone owning a gun for protection
You asked not me
you can hunt and sport shoot here and we dont have a 2A
Well we are not Australia
Do you know what negative rights are
thats a stupid point lol
No itโs a very valid point
Our cultures are not the same
true
Our politics are not the same
true
I wish I could live in a world where I wouldnโt have to worry about my Home being broken into (it has)
but you cant say not just protection its also hunting and sport. everywhere has guns for hunting and sport
not very many other places have guns for "just incase"
Those activities still fall under the second amendment
It is a right the govt canโt take away
Same with free speech
You can use anything to speak
have you seen the olympics?
Right?
On and off yeah but i donโt see the relevance
shooting is an olympic sport in where countries with harsher gun control such as japan are able to participate in the activity
and im pretty sure when they were writing the 2A they werent thinking of clay targets
Are they able to do so in their native countries, let alone do so every 4 years?
they were thinking of their negros revolting, the brits coming back and the civil war
yeah they go to a range in japan and shoot
Also please donโt put words in the mouths of dead men
please dont make reference to history?
I can make the same premise of an argument right now for the first amendment
Alternative media
yeh but we taling bout the 2a
ANYONE canโt just have a blog
I am talking about the bill of rights
well actually more so needing to feel safe
Who are you to question that?
@Fox โพ ๐ฆ๐บ guns are cheap
You can buy one illegally for under $1000 here already
and if there arent any guns it becomes supply and demand and the price increases
After it being flooded by millions of newly illegal guns, the prices would shrink
im someone who lives in a place where as i said earlier, the only thing to fear is being stabbed in the face while i sleep if i forget to lock my door
There are millions of guns in the United States
rather then the fear of walking into the wrong neighborhood and getting shot in the middle of the day
true
Over 300 million actually
nothing a bit of fire cant fix
heat up the furnace
start chucking them in
I don't care how efficient your government is, you aren't destroying 300 million guns anytime soon
No way
well im not saying ALLLLLLLL guns anyway
obviously hunting and farming and sport are legitimate reason
Also
The US has a large population
but billy from the bank who plays pokemon on the weekend doesnt need a gun
And lots of protected rights
Marching door to door confiscating weapons won't happen
its an amnysty
"bring in your guns before whenever and nothing dodgy happens"
"still have it after that date, you get arrested for fire arm possesion"
thats not difficult lol
Yes it is
What do you do when 100 million gun owners say they aren't giving up their guns
why? cause granny jan kept hers and shot the beaner breaking in, in turn getting sent to jail for manslaughter/
shoulda turned in yo gun granny
No
its the law...
Because they are right wing conservatives who know the 2nd amendment and don't want to give up their guns
Which is realistic
wht happens when 100 million drivers decide fuck the speed limit\
I wouldn't give up my firearms
6,335 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 4/26
| Next