which this means nothing

since muh god

Anyways

i am just not in the mood right now to have a debate

So i win?

Winning is subjective

since "i dont want to man i am so tired i dont feel in the mood"

wew lad

thats a nice dodge

its what 5:14 am

but here i am

debating faggots on the internet

@please refer to new discord ill gladly take their place

Ok

Çommie

Ok

so dont use

the common excuse of

"no u"

"basic economics!!!"

just dont become a sargonite retard

its cringy

Well, I'd still be explaining basic economics in depth

Rather than just saying "basic economics"

Whatever

go on

present your arguments

Need to do some r3search first

Mk

*types in google **communism does not work***

lol

also

if you say its a shithole

?

https://prnt.sc/jf3f5j

"the ussr is such a bad place to live"

ussr wasnt real communism

oh god..

it was socialism

y'know the thing that transforms a country to communism

do you even know what communism is?

Yeah, but that transformation is impossible

its a global world country stateless classless moneyless

How?

There has not been a single successful communist state

There has been successful socialist states

And there have been unsuccessful ones

like what?

pol pot

thats the only one i can name

actually

MUH DPRK

Venezuela

ok so

let me explain venezuala

70% of the economy is private

50% of healthcare private

No, im not telling you to explain venezuela

how is this socialism

tell me how

that isnt a part of my argument

ok so you acknowledge socialism works

im saying that there have been both successful and unsuccessful socialist states

i can name 1

and thats cambodia

and vietnam invaded it since there was a genocide

a socialist country

vietnam

actually invaded cambodia

since pol pot

was a genocidal

opportunist

anyways

what un-succesful socialist states

like name one

Another one would be the USSR its self, as it fell, and millions were slaughtered

Proof of the "millions" slaughtered

dont say holodomor

since i could do that all day

LOL

come on

provide proof

i can tell you what happened

Okay im done, Im not going to debate someone who literally denies historical facts

so some farmers (richer peasents) had made up most grain production then a weather famine happened which wasn't that bad but it hurt a bit but guess what the richer peasents called "kulaks" hoarded the rice and kept it for themselves and they wanted to make more profits from these grain so they withdrew it. so the soviets collectivized the land and the kulaks had already done the damage and a famine happened on a scale of 2-3 million dead but then the soviets fixed it later over the next 2-3 years

thats what "holodomor" is

@Deleted User sorry if you cant provide proof to a "historical fact"

pussyboi

http://bfy.tw/I1UM

@please refer to new discord

lookin..

LMAO

>the black book of communism

@Deleted User https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsvZoAATfOw

hmmmmmm Youtube video vs a published book 🤔

i already read the book

watch the video

there is no proof whatsoever of these deaths

😂

show proof