Why lobsters?

They didn't do anything like horses.

https://rotj.wordpress.com/2011/01/14/war-horse-at-virginia-historical-society/

PETA hates horses and anyone who works with them.

How the fuck is PETA still around? It seems common public knowledge that they're a huge joke of an organization.

Because they are fed by the left.

http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/ Found this goody on 4chan its kinda big though if anyone wants to give it a try.

Welp, furry drama is pretty crazy.

Man white people are the worst

Low IQs and can't even swim

fuckin wypipo

wypipo and their.....
................. Swimin Skilz

>tfw nobody wants you to tqlk about your furry drama

I mean

We are aware furries are all about drama

The greatest 4chan troll of all time is a furry

Even furries probably don't want to talk about furry drama

I dont think anyone questions they are pros at it

Lol that too

Ill stick to anime drama of your taste sucks over furry drama anyday

It was pretty bad. But it could always be worse...

>implying that we havent been through this before

But if you really must bring it up its because loli as a base has an inseparable and ultimately non sexual use that simply cannot be removed from anime easily. Every single prepubescent girl falls into being a loli.

Found the triggered Loli.

No

Loli at its base is benign

Some of the most wholesome anime have loli in them and are accepted in mainstream media

Almost every single Miyazaki film stars one

There is also the part where they used shadman, a niche artist, to represent all loli instead of something that actually had reach and was weird like Kodomo no Jikan, Prisma Illy, or strike witches

>Loli
>”Benign.”

When someone tries to defend Loli:

But yeah I guess having a loli movie win an academy award proves that it cant be benign

Loli as a base is indistinguishable from normal stories.

Furry has to rely on coopting other popular media that even remotely over laps their interest and there simply arent any popular furry media

Loli literally just means little girl, nothing more, what the hell are you on about @Little Boots ?

The one thing Discord specifically prohibits.

no, they prohibit loli*con*

don't conflate the two, or you make yourself look dumb

Yeah, Loli.

Loli = little girl

Great loli movie there

lolicon = sexualization of little girls, or someone into little girls (aka a pedophile)

Loli and lolicon is different

Thats why people defend it

>Implying Loli doesn’t lead into Lolicon.

yea it doesn't, unless you're saying "little girl" leads to "pedophilia"

Dont think those did my dude

For most Lolis, it leads to lolicon.

And that last one won awards everywhere

because that is literally what you are saying, loli is literally the word for little girl, just like shota/shouta is the word for little boy in Japanese

If that were true everyone would be pedophiles

There are hardly any anime without a token loli

fam I don't think you have any comprehension of what loli means, despite me clearly explaining

I mean for fucks sake every pokemon episode has a loli

you treat loli as if it is some dirty word with extra connotations, it isn't, it is literally just the Japanese word for "little girl"

On the flip side furry as a genre is a dirty word

having a little girl character, aka having a loli character, means nothing--there is no direct connection to lolicon, lolicons would be people who lust after little girls, or the pornography/sexualization of said little girls

Because its almost inseparable from the sexual aspect

Well, considering we’re talking about a cultural group that considers having sex with 14 year old girls to be perfectly appropriate...

What culture?

lolicons are a stark STARK minority of people

Japan age of consent is 16

And so are pedophiles in most fandoms.

actually, Japan's age of consent for some areas can go further than 16 I believe

yes, you are correct there

which is why it is an irrelevant arguement

Like furry for instance

They even have several names depending on animal

I’m just making the point of bringing it because weeaboos calling furries “sexual deviants who want to have sex with animals” is a bit hypocritical when Weeaboos have the habit of sexualizing minors.

Furries do it too

So...

Its even worse

Sexual deviants that sexualize underage animals

You see how that is shunned right?

there is a difference though, because it is a minority of anime fans who are lolicons, whereas furries is *all* about being animals and other weird degenerate stuff, and there is a LARGE sexual scene

^^^

Anime isnt predominantly sexual

Furry is almost entirely sexual

Not really, no.

and even if you compare both's sexual scenes, if you think jacking off to hentai is comparable to banging people in fur suits then you are objectively wrong

Have you actually worn a fur suit?

We arent furries lmao

no because I'm not a degenerate

It’s not exactly the most comfortable thing to wear, you know?

cool?

only makes furfags weirder, that they want to wear something freaky and uncomfortable

People don’t have sex in them because it’d be like trying to have sex with someone while wearing a bomb squad suit.

Im pretty sure I could prove that wrong

Only an extremely tiny few do that and they’re all social outcasts in their own right.