1. Capitalist society and mode of production
2. Massive privatization
3. Persecution of actual national socialists
4. Deals with capitalists all around the world (from very powerful and capitalist countries)
5. Many powerful jews still alive because Hitler was interested in them
6. Funded by US bankers

This stands proven

you stay debunked

😉

nope, i am saying the overton window is shifting right whether you like it or not and disseminating why is more constructive than just spouting marxist rhetoric

All you can do at this point is personally attack me

shut the fuck up you 5 year old minded dense faggot retard

😂

1. Capitalist society and mode of production
2. Massive privatization
3. Persecution of actual national socialists
4. Deals with capitalists all around the world (from very powerful and capitalist countries)
5. Many powerful jews still alive because Hitler was interested in them
6. Funded by US bankers

just quoting you, snowflake

You stay debunked, see

you can only personally attack me

your 6 points you cant prove reposted. awesome

you are really a snowflake

Capitalist society and mode of production is proved just by the philosophy of fascism and nazism alone

@Blebleh Do you think I've proven them, to get a second opinion about this?

no, it isnt...natsco was in opposition to international crdit loans...thats kinda why there was an international boycott

yes, but he's searching for the international bankers

like if industrialists weren't capitalists

blehbleh do you thin i proved them??? omg lmfao

Yes, it's called getting some outside perspective

If only you, the person who's being debunked, denies those points as proven, then you're just in denial

slack what is capitalism?

interestingly enough igfarben wasnt officially liquidated until 1976... maybe you can further your argument by using that

oh boy, here we go

Tell us, what is capitalism @slack ?

so let's think for a moment

that they eliminated all usury

the owners of the business are still extracting surplus value from the workers

part of what they produce

they aren't socialist

And they're privatizing, and making deals with foreign, capitalist and powerful countries

market distortion exists and the leaders have to obey the laws of the market

https://realcurrencies.wordpress.com/2014/06/05/capitalism-is-jewish-usury/

"I can't explain this with my own words because I don't fully understand it so I'll just link this article that sounds smart and fancy"

Yeah, no

Tell us, slack

What is capitalism

nah...i'll just link to an article that gives you a solid historical foundation in the development of capitalism

That's not what we're asking

who is we?

We're asking you to define capitalism

Blebleh and I

so get a room...i provided you with a solid answer...sorry it requires reading

Yeah, so you can't even define what capitalism is

What a waste of time

i'm imagining right now you probably have a rather small dengus judging from the extent of your butthurt

Now this isn't even funny, it's just pathetic

like you arent omg

Look slack, this might work with your parents and people who don't know shit about economy or politics, but you can't join a political server in discord and try to pull the same shit on us

i stated unequivocally that capitalism is n extension of jewish usury.

Because then you get debunked in 5 minutes and have to constantly post this pathetic passive-aggresive messages to protect your ideology and your ego

"Capitalism is Usury. Its defining belief is ‘return on investment’. This is an extension of the ‘time value’ of money, which is the central tenet of modern economics. Capitalism is unthinkable without banking and banking is institutionalized Usury. "

usually people who talk about parents still live with theirs, i find...whereas i live with my children

this isn't capitalism

Then god help your children, because you have the mindset of a 5 year old

capitalism is thinkable without banking?

capitalism means that workers are submitted to private owners, they have to sell their labour force

and they receive a wage

they're not in the same level of power

to negotiate a "free contract"

you have the mindset of a particular ankle biting archytype...your jimmies are rusteld...you dont understand what happened in the 1930s vis a vi germany...not my issue

And the political knowledge of someone that uses wordpress as a reliable source

Btw, blebleh is telling you what capitalism is, you should pay attention

if you remove usury you still have what I said

there are still classes

thats an analysis stemming from leftist discourse...it isnt one based in historical emergence and fundamental precepts necessary for capital to function as an international entitiy...whereas the precept sof jewish usury do...as that is from where it stems

It might help you in future discussions and hell, maybe even you'll learn a thing or two about economy

it is based in historical emergence

classes existed within feudalism too...class isnt capitalist in origin

If you want to talk about historical emergence, then you should look at historical materialism, the relationships of power between oppressor and oppressed, etc.

got no interest in talking to you, triggered snowflake with russian name but not russian.. too triggeredm too easily

😂

Now you're pulling the "nah, I'm not going to talk to you" card

holy fuck, this is surreal

in socialism there aren't classes

there are only workers not the bourgeoisie

don't confuse caste with class

histoical materialism or dialectical materialism or whatever you what to frame it is...was and is fundamentally flawed as it denieshe breadth of expression needed to create functional cohesion withn a society...it relegates the breadth of human need

Now in english, please

caste and class? no, i wasnt....this is a semantic obsfuscation

Seriously, what the fuck do you mean

it denieshe breadth of expression needed to create functional cohesion withn a society...it relegates the breadth of human need

??

if you mean the dravidians in india, for example...wellm then that is different as it is genetic in expression....and to a certain extent at this poiht so is class...but without a solid analysis of race realism...it's all just flufff

ooh so you reject historical materialism because of pseudoscientifc racism

yes...dialectical materialism is fundamentally flawed as it prohibits the urgency of the phenomenological as a need among the proletariat

this is old

you think that people should have people above them because genetics?

i suggest reading "why race matters" by levin...a jewish guy... they you can have an opinion on if racial determination is "pseudoscientific" lmao...

race realism has been debunked millions of times, both theoretically and practically

no, i didnt sy that...racial realism is not racism...

nom,m it hasnt you shabbos

IQ tests that depend on education?

you cant debunk solid science with emoperical proof...you can only decry it as being unfair and then scream "debunked!" idiot

IQ tests aren't even made to measure intelligence

They're made to measure progress in education

factoid

initially yes...but not now...

It's not a factoid, it's why it was invented in the first palce

No, not initially

it still has the same function

for instance the average progress in education in syria is 82, whereas in germany it is 999

99

ah ok...you dont sound brainwashed

Yes, that's why people who live in more poor countries usually score lower

one big happy family free of capitalist oppression. jfc

Lower IQ has always been tied to poverty, not race

bullshit

It's only racists who link it to, for example, black people in america, because it's useful for their agenda

it's a tool for the reactionaries to call them dumb and justify their privilege

from race, so they keep the status quo

cambodians have one of the highest progress in education averages...such a wealthy country

no, thats just parroting jewish bs

balck guys run faster not cos of longer femurs and white guys swim better not cos less dense bones and more buoyant...that would be racist to say so and it obviously isnt true when you see the olympics and those not there physiological differences could never ever extend to innate intelligence quotients in terms of ethnicity...the sceience that has proven so...is just pseudoscience or something

No, that's not racist to say

Those are physical abilities

but when it comes to intelligence, it isn't the same

and you are apparently the arbniter of political correctness in the 21st century..if someone wants to know what is ok or not ok to say...just ask you

You can see that results from people from the same economic background that are of different races overlap

intelligence averages are already extensively investigated

political correctness no, you base it to justify a state that is in the lives of the people and justifies one above another

calling itself socialist when it's not

in terms of ethnicity...its actually very very obvious...when your mind isnt obscrued by not wanting to say want isnt currently withion the accepted status quo of acceptable thought

I love how the argument is that historical materialism is shit because black people are dumb

It sure is an impressive "argument" to defend

how is historical materialism false? the modes of production have been changed

and yet its apparently my conceptions that are tantamount to those of a 5 yeard old child...you really QED'd that one

i already stated why..the necessary prohibtion of the phenomological is flawed

Yes, don't tell me it's more complex than that because you're basically saying that historical materialism is false because some races are more intelligent than others

it can never work

it already happened

Or because races have different characteristics overall

no, i was simply stating that some "races" vary in intellectual capactiy, uyes...with obviously bright people coming from all of them...i didnt actually say material dialecticism is flawed due to that, at all

"yes...dialectical materialism is fundamentally flawed as it prohibits the urgency of the phenomenological as a need among the proletariat"

material dialecticism, holy fuck

"holy" fucvk...now you are starting to get a handle on irony...well done

"histoical materialism or dialectical materialism or whatever you what to frame it is...was and is fundamentally flawed as it denieshe breadth of expression needed to create functional cohesion withn a society...it relegates the breadth of human need"

yes, materialism doesnt meet the innate needs of the species

what are those innate needs?

in the USSR healthcare, the life expectancy skyrocketed, improvements for women, more GDP than other countries

it worked without racism

better than the other systems

a need that the belief in "god" or whatever is not precluded

also, impressive technological developments

fast development

well...the Poles that escaped the gulag system to iran might disagree with that

bourgeois?

or revisionist?

or the czechs maybe

The error was prosecuting gays

because they believed the antigay pseudoscience in that time

Oh, so now you take out the "gulag" card to disprove the economic miracle of the USSR when we haven't mentioned the holocaust once when discussing about nazi germany

lezlek kolakowski...main currents in marxism..party member for decades...read that guy

gulags are labour camps

they're inherited from the tsarist katorga

Nice double standards

so are lao gais

what double standards?

Talk about economy, not gulags

inherited> excused. nice logic

Then we can have a somewhat decent discussion

Come on

you have no right to tell me what i can and cant talk about you little fascist gremlin

Try to disprove the USSR's economical growth

excuse of what?

there were more prisoners in the US than in the USSR with Stalin

and what if they had?

A nazi criticizing gulags and forced labour, this is hilarious 😂

good guy stalin. oh no tankies

I'm not humanist

they kill more and a revolution isn't something pacific

i'm not a nazi..i simply stated that natsco was the only viable texistential threat to international capital thus far seen

No, of course you're not, my friend

You only defend nazi germany until death

and "race realism"

but totally not a nazi, no sir

@Blebleh We should've listened to Durruti

you're a bit hysterical...but it's to be expected when someone tries to point out the merits to valuing labour over capital

yeah go shhot a taxi driver..that;ll make you cool

a taxi driver?

in a revolution a class overthrows another one

you probably should go listen to errico malatesta...let his spirit slap you about a bit

1. Capitalist society and mode of production
2. Massive privatization
3. Persecution of actual national socialists
4. Deals with capitalists all around the world (from very powerful and capitalist countries)
5. Many powerful jews still alive because Hitler was interested in them
6. Funded by US bankers

Ahhh, what a nice sight

in a reviolution, profiteers exploit the utopian ideologues

1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

All of them, there

6 points unproven reiterated. congrats

in a socialist revolution profiteers are expropriated

from capitalism to socialism

if there's a feudal stage they could make alliances

specially with peasants

the french revolution is a different one

the jacobins were jewish lololol

>can't differentiate a bourgeois revolution and a proletarian one

it doesn't matter

Where did you study, slack?

yeah, it kinda does

Genuinely curious

at your moms

brb

Do you tell your kids that too?

Well, you know

Your "kids"

no i show them my pictures of hanging out with the zapatistas

The imaginary ones that you say you have on the internet

if you say so

You're mexican?

nope

What are you doing with the zapatistas in the first place

drinking and laughing at kidnap photos of the mayor of san cristobal de la casa

Aren't commies part of a jewish plot?

You youself said it a while back

useful idiots to some extent, obviously...but communism is virulent meme and extend outwards as any successful ideological meme

Sure, because the useful idiots are the ones who want to change the system from top to bottom and directly eliminate any kind of bourgeoisie, jewish or not, not the ones who fight for an authoritarian capitalist state that has links to powerful capitalist countries and still exploits their workers and accumulates capital

Those are the useful idiots, not the slaves of capitalist tactics

nothing wrong with wanting a fairer world. shrugs

Sure.

you mentioned zizek...so maybe get a grip on hegel more

Fairer while being exploited by a capitalist that's protected by the government and can make you starve if he wants to? that's just wanting to be a slave

no, you are misappropriating my words and inserting your own inferences...yet again

I'm not misappropiating anything, those are the consequences of the society you want

how can you be truly be salient to political rhetoric...if you cannot debated competently?

There's nothing more dangerous that a slave that defends his masters, or even worse, wants even more authoritarian masters

the society i want? i dont believe i ever even braioched what i want, tbf

You just did

i mentioned some aspect sof nsdap policy...you inferred from this that i am a national socialist

You have every single aspect of what makes someone national "socialist"

the logical progression you employ is monolithic ..learn to debate better

Yeah, sure

i have every single aspect etc etc.... well, actually no...thats just your doctinaire programming speaking

hahah too easy. this is why people flee the far left

The guy who completely avoids every argument I make, constantly makes personal attacks, discusses about the discussion as a way to protect himself and can't even speak english properly, is going tell me that I need to debate better.

Yeah, no

i'm an interlocutor, not more..i havent told you a damn thing about my own position

well, actuyally if you scroll up...most of your comments are all about me personally

Sure, because the jewish plots, defending nazi germany and race realism aren't nazi characteristics, no sir

even though you are simply guessing

i am jewish lol

or rather was

Yeah, now you're just trolling

ah ok...i see it is more of a case of highlighting how fragile your dogma is

I'm sure nazi germany would be a paradise for you, as you said

"a paradise for workers"

i never said it would be...i said it was a paradise for its workers and that is true comparative to pre 33 germany

They check the census, see you're jewish, to the camp you go

i also said it was a reactionary ethnostate, but you chose not to see that point

Because I tend to discuss what I disagree with

You also said it was socialist