But Globalism is also enticing because it will help focus development in space

The good thing about agrarianism is that you can work towards it right now. Your life is your activism.

We already go to space chad

1969

Chad, do you have a life?

Why do you waste your life on here, Chad?

Parenting troubles, Chad?

@Deleted User Don't leave Chad, it's ok

don't mean to hurt your feelings

What is the logic behind that, Thundercock?

Well Chad

I agree with that train of thought

and that's exactly why i'm not for globalism

Globalism if it's purely white sure

But not if 90% are asian and black

I don't think you understand chad

not everyone on here is communist

Heaven exists.

https://youtu.be/rs6Y4kZ8qtw

http://8ch.net/leftypol/res/1916232.html

http://8ch.net/leftypol/res/1919049.html

agrarianism is past

And yet new.

no it's ancient

this is why we need mind upload and the ability to live in our own imaginary world permanently and be hooked up to computers at birth

That's a fake reality.

uhhhh

reality is fake in the first place

your ego creates it

Agrarianism is purest existence and man's perfect state.

maybe in your idealized vision

which is why you should live in a hyperreal simulation of it

we should all have this right

this should be the actual future

personal dream worlds that are our true subjective reality realized to us

basically the matrix, but we all know it's fake and that it doesn't exist to serve life force-harvesting machines

Why complicate what is already clear and simple.

because that is selfish

you want to affect the actual universe

hurt people, possibly

probably

most revolutionary plans end up with someone being hurt

Anarcho-Agrarianism is the most ethical way of life.

yeah but before you get there you murder a bunch of 'counterrevolutionaries'

That depends. It is easy to practice.

this desire to affect the actual universe is the filthy part

Violence is only needed when we are denied our existence.

what is the difference between a hyperreal simulation directly projected onto your intellect and the actual universe projecting itself onto your intellect?

It's both your brain decoding signals, it's just that in one, you can actually harm people and probably will. In the other, everything is already the way you want it to be and you control it and can change it if you want.

And you don't have to buy food or medicine anymore

That's vulgar and convoluted. Life is simple and the best life is also simple.

nah

i disagree strongly

i love what luxuries i can afford

if there was a world where i could do anything, i would jump at the opportunity

>I have a few acres on which I grow some veggies and I am pretty okay with such a life so every human on earth should be

yeah i mean, i get it, sounds nice

but not everyone likes it

or would want to actually live it

>because being uneducated peasants with a life expectancy of 40 years is the way humanity was always destined to be

meh, life expectancy is averaged from all ages

our life expectancy is 'high' today because infant mortality is down

if you survived being born, it's likely you would live to your late 60s anywhere in the ancient world

people just married young because fucking is fun

I can use that objection to anything, "but people won't like it". It is the happiest way to life. I don't know what else to tell you.

again, you are calling your ego objective

the only thing that is objective is what you see, the universe projected onto your ego

>people won't like it
>happiest way of life

no contradiction here?

anything you have to say *about* that is ego

But they will like. That was the handwave I was referring to.

Not everyone. Not most.

Unless you went to Africa.

Or rural China

Or any other third world area.

Westerners will never give up their technology.

It's just so obvious and straightforward how good and easy the answer is.

Yeah! Nuke everyone!

Hitler had the right idea, he was just an underachiever.

>developing technology for a few hundred more years and living like gods with a robotic slave work force is worse than going back 3000 years and living like niggers in Africa

I fully endorse the voluntary human extinction movement

Hitler had a serious chance of building a paradise, if only it wasn't for him being stopped by (((outside forces)))

no he didn't, he was a neurotic freak who would have killed anyone for more control over more of the globe

he shot himself in the head in a bunker

and his best scientists fled the country or were bought off by higher bidders

after fighting until it was no longer technically possible

waste of life

he played with citizens like pawns