international
Discord ID: 308950154222895104
752,937 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 56/7530
| Next
That worker sounds like a pretty well trained wagecuck
The perfect patsy for a land grab
Let's hope he doesn't find god so we can trick him into taking his bosses stuff
wagecuck? like most workers
Yup
>not having independent means
W A G E C U C K
Then?
Do you think that all workers can have them?
That's distributism, an utopic doctrine
No.
It's a sort of achievement for the exceptional
How is exploiting being exceptional?
capitalism is always distorted
Many must be exploited for the exploiter to profit.
Does this not make him exceptional?
yes, capitalists are a minority
No. Capitalists are anyone who believes in economic value.
Only a capitalist accepts local currency
The only non capitalists use other systems exclusively.
no, capitalists are people who have other people working for them
and they profit from them
Anyone who buys or sells has people working for them
We are a complicated planet wide telephathic hyper being
if I sell my shoe to someone face to face I don't have anyone working for me
The taxonomy is far too complex to say anyone is a non-capitalist
Did you make shoe?
Did you make materials to make shoe?
Being capitalist or not doesn't depend on the belief of economic value
It precisely does.
I didn't make the shoe, I bought it before
It is an indication of belief in a value system and identity as such
So you didn't do shit
You took something someone else did, transferred value, then transferred that object for value
In that case I didn't have workers working for me
I just bought a shoe with my money
You have the manufacturer of that shoe working for you
and then sold it
no
I'm putting a case in which I'm no capitalist
I just buy from a shop and sell the shoe
with no people working for me
I'm just trading
now, if I had an enterprise and I had workers doing the shoes; I'd profit and pay the workers a wage
in that case I'd be a capitalist
Financial capital does not depends on production anymore.
It's too late there you're already a willing node in the capitalist system.
A tool of it.
GG NO RE
Production depends on financial capital.
no
Marx explains capitalism
INCORRECTLY
I'm telling who's a capitalist
in many cases.
you think that it depends on belief
I know this because marxists rarely understand economics.
neoclassical economics?
austrian ones?
The tools to understand it aren't in the Marxist literary pantheon.
they falsify marxism
that's why you hate it
@OF-8 Financial capital are Banks, Trade, Investment, international trade, war.
surely you read about the subjective theory of value
)))banks(((
Right so then we're right back to "it's the Jews"
@OF-8 Lenin argued that the time of Production Capital is gone. And now is the time of Financial Capital free from production or country
instead of misinterpreting it, I'd advice you reading it or asking us
I believed once in that like you
Well yeah he helped bring about that system.
because I read neoclassical economics and austrian economics but they falsify marxism
Lmfao
"Don't trust your lying eyes, ask a Marxist"
๐๐๐ฝ
no, read from marx directly not the enemies of marxism
Ask a doctor on health.
@OF-8 Would you ask a homeless without a profession or education on a street advise on your health?
You know more Marxism than I do, ok. But it's not science, it's not particularly specialized.
Like. ,... that's pretty much what I'm doing here.
Communism is the science of the proletariat
There are marxist economists like Cockshott
I wanna read some lore so I'm hanging out with the larpers
@OF-8 Yes, Marxism is a true science. Marxism is defined as materialism.
a philosophy too
LMFOALFMAOR HOLY SHIT REALLY nigger!?
No. Stop. You are not up your own ass that hard?
yes, again he discovered labour exploitation
@OF-8 If you want to use one word to define Marxism its: "Materialism" - Lenin
Ok now I'm truly struggling.
Holy shit.
Lmfao
Wait. Is this like how women's studies is now a science?
neoclassical economics are idealist pseudoscience, closed models to match the society
Like when we discover an exploitation, bam! New science!
marxism describes capitalism; he didn't propose a clear socialist alternative
that's done by modern marxist economists; planned economy is from Lenin
and it was shaped by Stalin in practice
Bleh, that was legit prescient.
752,937 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 56/7530
| Next