international

Discord ID: 308950154222895104


752,937 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 2381/7530 | Next

2018-02-11 02:50:25 UTC

I like constitutionalism...but you bankers don't seem to.

2018-02-11 02:50:46 UTC

arrest bankers

2018-02-11 02:51:00 UTC

i dont like comusim my luxury lifestyle would be ruined

2018-02-11 02:51:08 UTC

No, arrest criminal bankers who have colluded or conspired against a group of people.

2018-02-11 02:51:22 UTC

Which is currently every single successful bank.

2018-02-11 02:51:28 UTC

my dad is a corperate banker

2018-02-11 02:51:43 UTC

Well you may want to give him a call.

2018-02-11 02:52:04 UTC

People are people.

2018-02-11 02:52:05 UTC

and say what

2018-02-11 02:52:11 UTC

Goodbye.

2018-02-11 02:52:20 UTC

but i have an iphone x

2018-02-11 02:52:48 UTC

Those who take from the poor and give to the rich are currently in a very bad position.

2018-02-11 02:52:58 UTC

my dad isnt

2018-02-11 02:53:18 UTC

With China on the ropes and every world leader looking for an appopriate target...the banks are looking very desperate right now.

2018-02-11 02:53:40 UTC

china was allways a misinvestmant anyway

2018-02-11 02:53:50 UTC

It wasn't until now.

2018-02-11 02:54:02 UTC

Those who invested in them have blood on their hands.

2018-02-11 02:54:03 UTC

i allways said it would be

2018-02-11 02:54:21 UTC

Investing in a terrorist state means that you've commited treason.

2018-02-11 02:54:26 UTC

No one profits by accident.

2018-02-11 02:54:55 UTC

my family havent lost any money

2018-02-11 02:55:03 UTC

They will very soon.

2018-02-11 02:55:14 UTC

cause we dont fund 'terrorism'

2018-02-11 02:55:22 UTC

Did you fund China?

2018-02-11 02:55:33 UTC

Shut the fuck up you stinky nigger jews

2018-02-11 02:55:43 UTC

Banks did.

2018-02-11 02:55:47 UTC

<@237954551062200322> spammer

2018-02-11 02:55:50 UTC

He's not looking too good right now.

2018-02-11 02:56:06 UTC

no never said that that would be a good idea because i knew the cconditions and the eventual colapse

2018-02-11 02:56:35 UTC

Are you aware of the current conditions?

2018-02-11 02:56:39 UTC

@Deleted User Alien kek

2018-02-11 02:57:00 UTC

XD

2018-02-11 02:57:08 UTC

yes and the declining life expectancey in chinese children

2018-02-11 02:57:21 UTC

@Deleted User HELP THE SPAM

2018-02-11 02:57:24 UTC

its consuming us

2018-02-11 02:57:34 UTC

The Chinese are pissed.

2018-02-11 02:58:15 UTC

nigger jew boy

2018-02-11 02:58:15 UTC

HELP US

2018-02-11 02:58:31 UTC

i stopped it you jew

2018-02-11 02:58:37 UTC

lol 3 percent

2018-02-11 02:58:38 UTC

That's confirmation that China is desperate.

2018-02-11 02:58:41 UTC

and 2

2018-02-11 02:58:48 UTC

why do you like bankers

2018-02-11 02:58:52 UTC

If you are aware of the current situation, you'll realize that currently freezing China's assets will not cause a collapse.

2018-02-11 02:59:12 UTC

i know about the declining life expectancey in young children in china

2018-02-11 02:59:31 UTC

As a matter of fact, government assets can be frozen solid without negatively impacting the people.

2018-02-11 02:59:41 UTC

That's the current situation.

2018-02-11 02:59:45 UTC

thats impossible

2018-02-11 02:59:50 UTC

@Deleted User GOD BLESS AMERICA

2018-02-11 02:59:53 UTC

Not at all.

2018-02-11 03:00:05 UTC

Only in wartime does freezing government assets cause a major problem.

2018-02-11 03:00:21 UTC

by freezing gouvernment assets you would directly affect the lives of 10's of millions of people

2018-02-11 03:00:36 UTC

Currently, all banking institutions do not have any direct investments that would cause a collapse.

2018-02-11 03:00:36 UTC

How many folks in here are trololol?

2018-02-11 03:00:44 UTC

Everything is now indirect.

2018-02-11 03:01:00 UTC

Which means freezing all of them will not harm the public.

2018-02-11 03:01:01 UTC

<@237954551062200322> how will you reorganize your new society

2018-02-11 03:01:11 UTC

no but if you froze all of chinas assets it would cause a major famine

2018-02-11 03:01:20 UTC

re

2018-02-11 03:01:23 UTC

You can keep the indirect government stuff flowing, but direct banking investments can be frozen without any issues.

2018-02-11 03:01:24 UTC

the only law is reeee

2018-02-11 03:01:24 UTC

I see Dan is autistic

2018-02-11 03:01:32 UTC

I'm autistic and I'm TRIGGERED XD

2018-02-11 03:01:36 UTC

"Winter is coming"

2018-02-11 03:01:48 UTC

Bankers.

2018-02-11 03:02:15 UTC

Why do you think things have been orchestrated this way?

2018-02-11 03:02:16 UTC

You just gotta hit 'em.

2018-02-11 03:02:18 UTC

<@237954551062200322> = sub human REEE

2018-02-11 03:02:45 UTC

The only reason banks were untouchable was because messing with them would cause an economical collapse.

2018-02-11 03:02:46 UTC

true but with the current state of involvement by the majority of banks it would still causae harm to alot of people

2018-02-11 03:02:47 UTC

@Deleted User HES GOT THE MEMES

2018-02-11 03:03:00 UTC

Name one group of people it would harm.

2018-02-11 03:03:13 UTC

probly israel

2018-02-11 03:03:28 UTC

@walmart greeter meh fuck those guys

2018-02-11 03:03:28 UTC

Only the guilty parties would be negatively impacted at this point.

2018-02-11 03:03:34 UTC

they aren't america

2018-02-11 03:03:35 UTC

So...let the freezing begin.

2018-02-11 03:03:38 UTC

the people working in low paying jobs within the gouvernment whos jobs would be cut

2018-02-11 03:03:47 UTC

@Deleted User i agreee

2018-02-11 03:03:57 UTC

The taxpayers are all that's needed to fund those jobs.

2018-02-11 03:04:10 UTC

Cutting the banks out by freezing everything wouldn't harm anyone.

2018-02-11 03:04:21 UTC

Only the corrupt.

2018-02-11 03:04:40 UTC

Those who would not like it are guilty by association.

2018-02-11 03:04:44 UTC

but still the input of money coming in to china. if it was to stay the same they would have to raise taxse and thats a whole nother matter

2018-02-11 03:04:47 UTC

That's the beauty of it.

2018-02-11 03:05:06 UTC

No they wouldn't, the banks wouldn't be leeching off of governments.

2018-02-11 03:05:12 UTC

That means less taxes.

2018-02-11 03:05:46 UTC

but still that would not halt these banks in their path noone is stupid enough to invest all ther money into one pale

2018-02-11 03:06:00 UTC

This entire thing was set up with one goal in mind.

2018-02-11 03:06:26 UTC

To be able to freeze all banks' assets without a negative economical impact.

2018-02-11 03:07:00 UTC

how do I communist bronies

2018-02-11 03:07:02 UTC

hmm

2018-02-11 03:07:17 UTC

"my little commie" - I use to wonder what starvation could be

2018-02-11 03:07:32 UTC

Let's starve the banks.

2018-02-11 03:07:34 UTC

but the bankers will just ivest alot of there assets into the new upciming places for manufactoring such as bangladesh and india

2018-02-11 03:07:40 UTC

until i read tolstoy and engels religiously

2018-02-11 03:07:55 UTC

All assets would be frozen and the people who own them would be under indictment.

2018-02-11 03:08:05 UTC

They wouldn't be able to move anything.

2018-02-11 03:08:10 UTC

That's the point.

2018-02-11 03:08:15 UTC

If they did, it would be tracked.

752,937 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 2381/7530 | Next