Look it up

it's in it's early stages at the moment

Designer babies?

Theoretically we can edit any appearances of peoples

Ye eugenics is different, but we'd be using the same concept

Can someone please explain how you plan to use 'gene editing' and how it will be applied uniformly to eliminate mutations to eliminate differences in societies genetics? Because if there are differences there is a hotbed for conflict.

Remove race

simple as that

Edit out physical differences between races

Gene editing is confirmed to be well on it's way to becoming a reality

It's coming

Assuming we humanity doesn't BTFO itself before

Transhumanism is not magic bullet. It is no promise solve all. At all.

Gene editing, theoretically can do so

it just requires massive political change

Not everyone will embrace transhumanism. I'd probably onlly use it to prolong life maybe

I would argue that only material equality, communism, is the answer to conflict. If you disagree, you believe in fairy tales. Materialism is the scientific basis of reality.

What's the point of communism when you have transhumanism

@Deleted User You completely disregard the Human element

I imagine post transhumanism society will be a post scarcity society

What's the point in communism at that point

No, I am saying if you believe in anything beyond materialism, that is unscientific.

Communism ignores racial division

ethnic division

cultural division

That's a flaw

and puts class over all else as the single problem

Communism is idealist

lol

It's ironic that you'd say what you just said

@Deleted User It acknowledges Human elements, such as greed, selfishness, pride etc.

We have already explored how Fascism chases its tail to try and solve the conflict in society. Your solution was magical, 'transhumanism will just fix it'. The fundamental basis of conflict is material differences.

No transhumanism will fix mutations

Let's explore that.

which you said was an issue

although mutations only happen over an incredibly long period of time

for when it becomes an issue

to ethnonationalism

Other than that transhumanism isn't needed

Ethno fascism doesn't intend to install world government

it's in the name man

it's at odds with globalism

if it were to it would require the removal of other ethnicities/races

by some means, sterilization, marriage laws maybe etc.

I don't understand your proposed solution, either:
1: Differences don't exist, plummeting society into stagnation and lack of specialisation
2: We excel and make the best of every role, make differences, but resolve conflicts by providing material means to everyone

Differences do certainly exist

even amongst races

If you believe seperate nation states instead of one world government is stagnation then sure

what do you mean by lack of specialisation?

very broad

I do not advocate gene editing everyone to be the same

in fact gene editing will create more specialised people

improve strength, intelligence etc.

Humanity is a cancer that should be culled.

@reprehensible#5372 edgy faggot

We need to rape betas

It's the only way really

gtfo shlomo

We need to rape them so they won't destroy themselves.

@Deleted User has admitted perpetual conflict. But nothing is forever. Eventually it must be resolved if we are to evolve. Why are you holding back the species with your stubborn superstition?

Needs to be an epidemic

Of men forcibly raping women they see wandering alone

Or with another woman

@Deleted User We always admitted conflict exists

@Deleted User The more specialised you make people, without material equality, the more conflict you generate.

actually define what sort of conflict

racial conflict is solveable

>maybe communism AFTER transhumanism
I retire. Good chat lads.

Racial conflict is solveable by there being one or two races

@Deleted User You just want to hear others talk up your stubborn beliefs

Sure, Fascism is a means to an ends. Some Marxists say Socialism, but the conclusion is the same.

@reprehensible#5372 agreed

One preferably

Nothing will

It is very hard to convey information to people who haven't read anything.

Communism certainly won't

I do not apologise to being very defensive.

Fascism is almost definitely not a means to an end

Oh boy.

The final evolution isn't communism

although currency may be removed some day

I actually make an effort into investing into what might be learning experience. Consider yourself very lucky. Now, you can give me the KGB treatment, if you are so inspired.

KGB Treatment?

Your best, in other words.

We proved the inital point wrong

at least the question wasn't very clear or incorrect

Can we be very clear about this?

Let's be very, very clear.

sure

Trying to talk will people is hard.

What do you want to say @Deleted User

Okay, then your turn.

Everything you said I proved wrong or explained to you @Deleted User

You just went full SJW. Why so emotional?

Either we reset and go word for word, or we disengage.

Farewell.

Aristotelian logic was debunked by Kant.

No, Critique of Pure Reason.

It is possible to come to contradictory conclusions uses Aristotelian logic.