platitudinous comment

Hitler didn't do shit to some strategic jews

anticapitalist or anticommunist, choose one

yeah, thats right...the trajectory of nsdap policty was one of increasing leniency not vice versa as you would promulgate

So not only you don't do anything to capitalists, you also let some very powerful jews stay?

National socialism is a joke

they are not mutually exclusive, blebleh

the hitlerite branch even removed strasserists

True

yes they are

Both Strasser brothers were taken care of

And you know why?

national socialism was the obnly credible existential threat to international capital ever and the most significant economic thurnaround in recorded history lololol

Because they were actually socialists

they don't want to seize the means of production

With some serious nationalistic spooks, but socialists nonetheless

yes, the third position is interesting, that is true

Strasserite here

good on you

communism has been, and still, the threat to capital

threat to international capital> funded by international capital....eh

So, so far we have

1. Capitalist society and mode of production
2. Massive privatization
3. Persecution of actual national socialists
4. Deals with capitalists all around the world (from very powerful and capitalist countries)
5. Many powerful jews still alive because Hitler was interested in them

And you dare to say it was socialist, holy fuck 😂

there have been countless of operations against them

there are political prisoners too

and blocked countries

total misreading of it....when Schlacht was finally ousted..the war began soon after

not funded by international capital

in a planned economy the workers produce all for themselves

got the list of jewish banking houses here...if you want...not even just Nyabanken

for free?

reading with confirmation bias, is a bitch

"Another elusive case of reported financing of Hitler is that of Fritz Thyssen, the German steel magnate who associated himself with the Nazi movement in the early 20s."

communism is a movement to abolish the present state of things, it wants to advance to socialism, removing the capitalists

"Thyssen's U.S. partners were, of course, prominent members of the Wall Street financial establishment."

making conspiracies about the tenets doesn't work for us

*really makes me think*

it's a sneaky co option of classical english anarchism penned by a 3rd cousin to the rothschild dynasty and for all his works he never named them even once....just vaguaries "the capitalist" lololol

the capitalist is well defined

but you didn't read

"Nazi financier Hendrik Jozef Kouwenhoven, Roland Harriman's fellow-director at Union Banking Corporation in New York, was managing director of the Bank voor Handel en Scheepvaart N.V. (BHS) of Rotterdam. In 1940 the BHS held approximately $2.2 million assets in the Union Banking Corporation, which in turn did most of its business with BHS.20 In the 1930s Kouwenhoven was also a director of the Vereinigte Stahlwerke A.G., the steel cartel founded with Wall Street funds in the mid-1920s. Like Baron Schroder, he was a prominent Hitler supporter."

the owners of the means of productions are the bourgeoisie

bankers included

Do you think that the bank of the USSR was private?

it's not a "conspiracy" it's geneaology straight dope...and to be fair..it was you that mentioned the spectre of 33rd degree masonry anfter bleating out the catchword "anti semitism" lolol

@slack#7189 looks like Hitler was financed by US bankers, really makes me think

antisemitism for bakunin

😂

@slack

http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/712284090d61.jpg

no, the nsdap got no funding after 33 and i already looked a lot into that.

bloodlines don't determine class

muh above top secret

we're in a class society not a society of castes

ah do you think it's fake?

are you trying to tell me these bankers didn't know in what they were investing?

😂

well, i say...fuck jewish supremacism in the eye...so i guess that would mean to you i hate all jews

Not necessarily

Jews are one thing, zionism is other

there was no investment after 1933...the nsdap went off plantation....hence samuel untermeyers speech

But seriously slack, don't embarass yourself more

zionists and static jewish power were in conflict in the 30s

no, communists aren't for jewish supremacism

Everything you've said so fair has been easily debunked in less than one second

i'm not embarrassing myself, i am highlighting the usual arguments as being fallacious

easily debunked in less than one second....sounds legit

They're not fallacious as there's proof of every one of them

lenin lets it clear that the party doesn't have to be influenced by religion

and Albania was the first socialist atheist state

theres proof for a lot of things in a controlled and rewritten academic appraisal

Not only that, state atheism was spread like crazy

you can search all their texts

whereas...if you go back tot he source documents...then it's a little bit different

Yeah, now it's all a historical revisionism, sure

could never happen

^fallacy

triggered ^

haha then you have to invent a global conspiracy that rewrites all the texts and hides it; even with the opposition of the communists, like a hidden and almighty elite that never gets wrong

wat

even though communists and capitalists are against each other

in your eyes

when going from capitalism to socialism

no, this is reality

different pay grade

it's denying all the evidence, practice and theory

it's your dogmatic version of peer approved reality

it can be seen in real life just with the unions alone; capital is reactive

k

Slack, what I'm doing is going to the original sources and telling you why you're wrong. What you're doing is trying to push a national socialist agenda that's only lies on top of more lies to hide the fact that they were as capitalist as anyone else

we're not metaphyisical

we're materialists, we don't justify oppression and call ourselves socialists because yes

i'm not trying to push anything except nuances that communists cant bear to hear

Look, retard

You're saying nazi germany was socialist and I've given you several examples of why it wasn't

And you keep covering your ears and shouting

it's not me who can't bear nuance and critique

Not only did the workers NOT own the MoP, it acted like the most economically neoliberal country in practice, while being politically authoritarian, given the examples I provided earlier

You're basically defending what you're supposed to be against just to protect your ideology (in a zizekian sense)

socialism is based on the common wheel, simple as that...your co option of it is the imposter

lol well considering i am already a retard and dense faggot, it may well be you that is having some difficulty keeping their jimmies unrusteld lololol