international
Discord ID: 308950154222895104
752,937 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 628/7530
| Next
@Firefly well?
Why did they start spamming though
@everyone PM me to join the moderators team. Write a little bit about yourself. Cheers!!
God dang you
Silly goose
@Firefly Gimme mod
dad
@Sovnarkom Because theyre nazis and have a tendency to sperg out and act like toddlers
wait, has this place actually become leftist now ? a few months ago it was literally 85% alt right trolls
noticable turn yeah
They have low attention spans
meh. dont know if this is better or worse now. any ethno transhumanist monarchists here ?
...
That isn't a thing
Right..?
I'm transhumanist
( อกยฐ อส อกยฐ)
lost my cade
zionist transhumanist ? or something else.
I hope it gets run over @Shaggy Blanco
what kind of politics do transhumanists advocate?
any really
I, the proletariat am being oppressed by this bourgise transhumanist
Most are for FALC
meh, most irl transhumanists are jewish elitists trying to bend humanity through globalism, so they can rule over the mulatto slave race, as a very select elite.
Literally me
๐
Tfw they saw through my Jewish tricks
do you also pray to moloch and collect baby foreskins for your invincibility potion
Goy Eye for the Jew Guy?
but seriously, im curious.
considering transhumanism is indeed a very elitist ideology, where do your motives lie ? do you hope to be part of it ? how do you hope to be significant enough for such. or have you simply been bluepilled into supporting an ideology that literally works against you.
not a rhetorical question
I dont see myself as part of any political or sociopolitical movement, i just observe and rationalize.
tfw he doesnt wanna talk to me ๐ฃ
found the radical centrist
i mean, i may have subjective opinions, but i dont claim the objective truth in that, and since im just a depressed neet it doesnt matter either way
Would I like to upgrade my flesh suit?
Hell Yes
Am I scared of a Bourgeois ignited Transhumanist movement
Hell Yes
its not a secret that transhumanism is widely globalist and jewish. the goal of the NWO is to create an envoirement receptive for elitarian transhumanism
If transhumanism after the Bourgeois mass execution + gulag, then it's good.
I'm a libertarian socialist, and I think that transhumanism, under socialism, would benefit and improve all humanity
^
implying in transhumanism 7 billion people are gonna be part of it
theres gonna be the inferior flesh men, and the demi god transhumanist overloards
perhaps even an AI hivemind completely based on rationalism, proceeding to consume the planet and surrounding star systems, neverendingly self evolving and spreading into space
in an reality where our brains are quantum computer theres not gonna be any sort of class struggle
^
hahaha, thats a fucking utopia completely impossible to achieve
the first one
Implying automation isn't already starting
who holds the world in his grip currently ? its the (((bankers))) and silicon valley is gonna be building these machines
it doesnt look good for your socialist utopia
Kill both?
That's why I'm a socialist dude
thats not very realistic
how are we gonna stop this
accelerationism ?
kicked over trashcans ?
You're right that the outlook isn't good. But that doesn't change my views.
we are alredy living in a police state, and the backseat elite has both education and goverments in its tight grip
7 billion is a huge number. Pick a target and walk over it. Do what needs to be done. But can't be talked about b/c Discord isn't end to end encrypted.
who are you planning to genocide ? capitalists ? africans ? chinese ?
>Africans
Wut
Wut
Is there an African ruling class I didn't know about
That went from 0 to pol very quickly.
@Firefly pick me
i was asking you
Dude his name is Initial dues
not assuming anything myself
hey, i was picking up on his statement, this is not my position
gosh
oh
Well
>7 billion is a huge number. Pick a target and walk over it. Do what needs to be done.
this i refered to
Ye
ruling class.
well the ruling class is small
being vague on purpose
He basically has pol written on his forehead
Anyway
I don't want any genocide, personally
If it can be avoided, awesome.
the very select ruling class doesnt plan on including this earth population on their plans of transcendece, they plan to enslave.
and as much as they cant include everyone, a socialist utopia couldnt either. theres too many people. especially in 3rd world countrys. its a problem that cannot be solved retroactively
We can hope that people will start to see capitalisms decay when their boss fires them and replaces them with a machine that works for free
high birthrates is what im refering to
Hold on I have a huge essay about this lemme get it
We need to get Jason Unruhe on this convo
Well, it's not so much that overpopulation doesn't happen as it is that it's just a part of a much larger issue, which ought to be the focus. That issue is sustainability. Yes, having too large a population can be a threat to this sustainability, but humanity has encountered this issue frequently throughout its history and its response has always been to change the conditions and expand its territory to accommodate this growing population, not to start executing its citizens, killing off groups of people, or restricting their birthrates. I think we should continue this trend. We should look at overpopulation as just symptomatic of a lack of sustainability.
When we frame the issue as "we have too many people" rather than "we aren't sustainable", it can lead to violent and reactionary conclusions like genocides, """eugenics""" programs, restricting births, and the like. It also provides an avenue for reactionaries to excuse their desire to kill off this or that population, or starve out Africa or whatever, on the basis of preventing AGW and ensuring stability. The greatest problem of this is the same that exists in all reactionary approaches: all it does it return us back to a previous state, or some semblance thereof, without solving the problem itself. That problem is sustainability. Unless we intend on suppressing our population forever and somehow freezing our civilization in a given point of time (which is a stasis myth characteristic of reactionary ideology), we need to develop more sustainable practices and technologies in order to improve the environmental conditions of our societies and lands and to guarantee that we can grow our population without population growth being a threat to ecology, economy, or society.
thats reasonable
do you people at least agree that elite induced mass immigration is an active effort of the ruling class to subvert unique peoples and force them into submission ?
It's a strategy and 'in-power' force would use, so yeah.
Sort of?? I feel like there are multiple factors
^
phew, at least this isnt a bluepilled idpol group.
But I also don't think the ruling class has any overarching cohesive agenda other than to stay on top, maintain their image, and live comfortably
Cus you know, psychological egoism.
752,937 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 628/7530
| Next