That worker sounds like a pretty well trained wagecuck

The perfect patsy for a land grab

Let's hope he doesn't find god so we can trick him into taking his bosses stuff

wagecuck? like most workers

Yup

>not having independent means

W A G E C U C K

Then?

Do you think that all workers can have them?

That's distributism, an utopic doctrine

No.

It's a sort of achievement for the exceptional

How is exploiting being exceptional?

capitalism is always distorted

Many must be exploited for the exploiter to profit.

Does this not make him exceptional?

yes, capitalists are a minority

No. Capitalists are anyone who believes in economic value.

Only a capitalist accepts local currency

The only non capitalists use other systems exclusively.

no, capitalists are people who have other people working for them

and they profit from them

Anyone who buys or sells has people working for them

We are a complicated planet wide telephathic hyper being

if I sell my shoe to someone face to face I don't have anyone working for me

The taxonomy is far too complex to say anyone is a non-capitalist

Did you make shoe?

Did you make materials to make shoe?

Being capitalist or not doesn't depend on the belief of economic value

It precisely does.

I didn't make the shoe, I bought it before

It is an indication of belief in a value system and identity as such

So you didn't do shit

You took something someone else did, transferred value, then transferred that object for value

In that case I didn't have workers working for me

I just bought a shoe with my money

You have the manufacturer of that shoe working for you

and then sold it

no

I'm putting a case in which I'm no capitalist

I just buy from a shop and sell the shoe

with no people working for me

I'm just trading

now, if I had an enterprise and I had workers doing the shoes; I'd profit and pay the workers a wage

in that case I'd be a capitalist

Financial capital does not depends on production anymore.

It's too late there you're already a willing node in the capitalist system.

A tool of it.

GG NO RE

Production depends on financial capital.

no

Marx explains capitalism

INCORRECTLY

I'm telling who's a capitalist

in many cases.

you think that it depends on belief

I know this because marxists rarely understand economics.

neoclassical economics?

austrian ones?

The tools to understand it aren't in the Marxist literary pantheon.

they falsify marxism

that's why you hate it

@OF-8 Financial capital are Banks, Trade, Investment, international trade, war.

surely you read about the subjective theory of value

)))banks(((

Right so then we're right back to "it's the Jews"

@OF-8 Lenin argued that the time of Production Capital is gone. And now is the time of Financial Capital free from production or country

instead of misinterpreting it, I'd advice you reading it or asking us

I believed once in that like you

Well yeah he helped bring about that system.

because I read neoclassical economics and austrian economics but they falsify marxism

Lmfao

"Don't trust your lying eyes, ask a Marxist"

😎👌🏽

@OF-8 Ask a Marxist on Marxism.

no, read from marx directly not the enemies of marxism

Ask a doctor on health.

My god @Ornament you're so naive

@OF-8 Would you ask a homeless without a profession or education on a street advise on your health?

You know more Marxism than I do, ok. But it's not science, it's not particularly specialized.

Like. ,... that's pretty much what I'm doing here.

Communism is the science of the proletariat

There are marxist economists like Cockshott

I wanna read some lore so I'm hanging out with the larpers

@OF-8 Yes, Marxism is a true science. Marxism is defined as materialism.

a philosophy too

LMFOALFMAOR HOLY SHIT REALLY nigger!?

No. Stop. You are not up your own ass that hard?

yes, again he discovered labour exploitation

@OF-8 If you want to use one word to define Marxism its: "Materialism" - Lenin

Ok now I'm truly struggling.

Holy shit.

Lmfao

Wait. Is this like how women's studies is now a science?

neoclassical economics are idealist pseudoscience, closed models to match the society

Like when we discover an exploitation, bam! New science!

marxism describes capitalism; he didn't propose a clear socialist alternative

that's done by modern marxist economists; planned economy is from Lenin

and it was shaped by Stalin in practice

Bleh, that was legit prescient.