Especially urban combat.

Six people is all you need if you have multiple IFVs.

Indian tank best tank

And it's actually APCs that are really optimized for troop carrying, the only goal an IFV has is to destroy fortifications and infantry.

So more ammo wouldn't be a lot of utility.

Especially since it is supposed to retreat the moment it faces heavy resistance.

Thanks for the info

10/10 engagement

The whole Vietnam War was a 10/10 engagement.

You know, for Americans.

lmao Americans got shrekt

Fuckin press

pathetic display for murricans

Imagine winning so hard that you get tired of killing slanteyes.

The press lost the war, not the armed forces

Russian tanks had the best design due to the tilted armor

Making the bullets deflect

Tilted armor wasn't a secret.

Fuck off faggot.

In ww2

It sorta was

No it sort of wasn't.

You aggressive lil munk

What other tank had it

Tell me

In ww2

<:mthink:520000393837674497>

i hate discord americans fuck all of you shart in mart scums

👌

lmao

@Deleted User blow it out your ass

absolutely shrekt

beyond recognition

The Germans were pretty much the only people not to suck the dick of tilted armor, with the exception of the Panther.

3 million gooks for 50k Yanks

Which was an exceptional tank.

>when you have such aerial superiority your only losses are due to anti-aircraft
>h-haha guys totally beat the americans haha

Eat shit

we fucked the vietnamese so hard, they still suffer today

Jk

An underdeveloped country like Vietnam absolutely humiliated US in every respect. Much like Winter War, actually, in lotsa ways.

parts of the jungle still don't grow back

By killing loads of gooks.

@εïз irma εïз Panzer 3 was actually a very good tank, initially and I actually was better than the early t-34s

The Panzer III was never better than the T-34 even with the 75mm.

Anyone know Owen Benjamin

@εïз irma εïз unfortunately as I mentioned earlier, it didn't have any that ammunition in the beginning of the war

the water is still unsafe, vietnamese children are born already poisoned as legacy to how hard the US pushed the Vietnamese shit in

king tiger raped everything

Well of course a T-34 with no ammunition is going to lose to anything.

But this was not commonplace.

lmao

In addition to its poor sights made it difficult even spot the target, Panzer three commanders were instructed to shoot at the t-34 as soon as possible to force their Commander to hatch down

With machine gun

Yeah I got inside of a Panzer III once and it has exceptional sights.

Americans absolutely SHREKT

Being inside of a T-34 is like being inside of a coffin.

Americans were never pushed back in Vietnam

```We did't lose a single battle in Nam```
- American generals 30 years later, hoping nobody notices

Dems made them lose

american military is pretty overrated

^

yes

Hey my guy can you stop posting individual battles that obscure the larger picture that on a per-battle basis the Americans were actually raping the fuck out of the zipperheads

Thanks in advance

What's a zipperhead

Did they have lighters as heads?

oh what larger picture? the one where Socialist Republic of Vietnam won? oh that one, I like that one too

I mean America had pretty clear air superiority over the Vietgooks

Loooool

THAT'S WHY ITS SO FUNNY!

US and ARVN had every advantage

and still the dumb fuckers couldn't do it

lmao

10/10 fail

would get amused by again

It's actually not that funny that a misguided intervention that alienates the locals at every opportunity with massive anti-imperialist support would lose.

But just talking about military casualties the NVA/Viet Cong got absolutely buttfucked hard.

it wasn't even a real war, the US wasn't supposed to advance, or else viets woulda been really fucked

military casualties mean little in the end. Red Army suffered much more casualties than did Wehrmacht, but look who climbed ontop the Reichstag 😏

North Vietnam only could put up a fair fight because treaties stopped the US from bombing supply lines in Laos and Cambodia

just there protecting the south vietnamese

Look who lost 20 million people.

And China

about 10,8 million military casualties, the rest were civvies butchered by those who *got the bullet in the end*

only 10.8 million military casualties!! stop bullying soviets111! <:brainlet:508484031625691156>

If Laos was allowed to be airstriked none of that would've happened

@Xinyue sure you can say military casualties don't mean much but if you gang up with 10 other guys to beat up one dude and he kills all but one of you before walking away cause he's tired, that's not a real win

International politics are gay

well most of that was in 1941 and 1942 when Axis had the numerical superiority. began to turn about in 1943 and was flipped in 1944 onwards

Lololol implying soviets could win against Germans without America

That's just not even true.

Operation Bagration was absolute shreking

Hey soviets where did you get your gunpowder from

^

And he brings up a valid point despite being a retard otherwise.

Without US aid the Soviets would have crumbled.

Wow

Why am I a retard