fren-chat
Discord ID: 489003669493121031
176,082 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 25/705
| Next
nice one
explain the distinction
What is a loli?
i jsut did
I honestly dont know
???
No you didn't
i did
how does having 3 moms affect more then having internet and a house and clothes and a gun etc...?
scroll up
where
quote it
these have HUGE affects on humanity
" those dont have as big of an effect as not having a dad or having a weird parent situation does"
3 moms does little if they care for the child right
*why* don't they have as big of an effect?
explain the distinction
im talking about a kid growing up
LOLISYOUDONTBELONGHERE
3 moms cant possibly care for the child right
Gtfo kids
because parenting is a huge thing in a childs life
a kid is affected more by internet access then 3 loving mothers do
what do you mean
lmao
how you are parented shapes you for life
its not like having gay parents or poly parents make the child fucked up
WHAT IS A LOLI
what fucks them up is bad parebting
IS IT A CHILD
so how will having three mothers negatively impact them
@Anti Corona Virus Suit Ragathor stop trying to derail or i'll give you a mute role
no dad
๐ | **meow leveled up!**
Parenting is the most important thing in a childs psychological development
you know what else fucks up a kid? foster care, dead beat dads, drug addict moms
retarded parents
you need both a mom and a dad
abusive parebts
Why?
You need them *or what?*
they both provide different things that a child needs
having a mom and dad doesn't always beneift the child
"needs?"
for well rounded development
Lets be homest, a kid raised by 3 mothers is gonna feel a lot different compared to a kid raised by a mother and father
However, I am not saying that it is inherently bad
Children need a father role
define well rounded
you arent making any points
A child need freedom
make a point please
Without a father they will grow up all sorts of fucked up
"fucked up?"
3 mothers is better then foster care
Single mothers fuck children up
@ใใใใใใ ใใใใ just because it isnt better in 10p% of situations doesnt mean that it doesnt matter
how so
i would prefer foster care over 3 moms if i was a kid
You need both parents
why
need them *for what?*
They are at higher risk for mental disorders and unacceptable societal behavior
@meow be honest, you wouldnt
"unacceptable social behavior?"
the higer risk is from not being raised correctly
that isnt a point
but 3 mothers can raise a child correctly
IE. committing crimes, becoming killers, sexual predators etc.
the father itself isnt needed, whats neede is how a father ACTS to a kid
And it requires a mother and father to raise a child correctly
lets them play sports, bes the father figure
i have
women are capable of that too
@Deleted User how do you define "correctly?"
they need it for well rounded development
all children need a positive male role model
what is well rounded development
as men and women play different roles in parenting
@Eris so that the child doesnt grow up with serious psychological problems
^^
but two mothers can play both the roles
what are "serious psychological problems?"
a male specifically is not needed
no
If 3 mothers are able to raise a child properly, then I dont see an issue with them doing it
they cant
that just isnt possible
Im just saying
why?
You aren't adequately explaining the consequences of your IF->THEN statement
If the are able to
Then good for them
you just keep saying it's needed
Depression, anxiety, homosexuality, bipolar @Eris
you do not explain what it's needed FOR
we have said this many times
what's wrong with any of those things
youre ignoring it
because you dont want to adress it
hmmmmmmm
first off
bipolar and homosexuality happen at birth
@Eris make a point and stop asking for the fucking wiki
not development
same with depression
you cant learn those 3 things
I don't make points
dumbass
I question points
>homosexuality occurs at birth
Thats arguable
who brought that up
homosexuality doesnt happen at birth
@Eris many studies have proven that having no positive male/father like role model pushes most children down destructive paths. The father role is the one that sets the ground rules for children and also is usually the disher of punishment
Its a psychological disorder
That teaches kids what is and isn't acceptable behavior
"what studies" -eris
aw fuck when did it turn to 1 am
calling it
your predisposed at birth, you can learn to be heterosexual, but chances are your gay
@Anti Corona Virus Suit Ragathor define "Destructive paths" and explain to me why it is bad to be on a destructive path
semantics isnt an argument
lol
Because it is against biological imperitves
You are assuming premises
youre just trying to play semantics
>why is it bad to be on a destructive path
I imagine it is pretty self explanatory
^^
It's not.
You're assuming that it is
Yes it is
it is
so you're avoiding justifying it
it is
its in the name
youre avoiding that its bad
What is bad about destruction?
lol
You want to live the best and longest life possible while passing on your genes if they are good enough.
@Eris destruction
Destruction typically is not a good thing
>You want to live the best and longest life possible while passing on your genes if they are good enough.
Why?
It depends
Not everyone considers the same behavior patterns as "destructive"
>Destruction typically is not a good thing
Why?
To further the species
And that's good?
So we can evolve farther
Its amoral
And it's a given that we should evolve farther?
yes
No.
you have no argument
case closed
im sterile, i cant pass my genese, so i dont give a fuck about living long enough to do so, i just want to do what makes me happy
^
^^
You have no justification for your views
Thats gay
they are assumed purely because they are normative
yes
@Eris and what do you have
You have unjustified premises
i wonder why they are normative
lol
My justification is my biological imperative
I wonder that too
its almost like thats how its supposed to be
I'm the only one wondering
as a male of the human race
"supposed to be?"
yea
I want to have a child to pass on my genes
why?
That is the goal as a human
You can choose to have a child
as is all animals
not everyone has a biological impertive as not everyone is fertile
why are you asking why?
y should i live as if to pass on my genese if thats not possinle?
possible*
That is a part of the design @ใใใใใใ ใใใใ
following the design is good?
yes
why
Yes
humanity sucks, screw humanitu
if you go against nature
@Eris you don't want a pc that doesn't work do you
We are just talking in circles
humans need to go extinct
youre biting the hand that feeds you
so?
not all PC are the same
Why would you pass on your genes if:
A) you are unable to
B) you cant secure a good future for your child
your argument sucks
Humans, at least in my view are observers of the universe.
you would you want to do that
lol
Our goal is to document everything we see
Eris' ideology is litteraly "do what you want"
^
@ใใใใใใ ใใใใ so if i put ram where the motherboard goes it will work
liberal lol
If you want to put the ram where the motherboard goes, do it
the ram goes on the motherboard dipshit
yes
Lol
im a computer engineer and programmer
i realized that
i know how computers work
not all computers are designed the same
Computers are demonic prove me wrong
again it's a problem of an assumed goal
^
that isnt a problem
@ใใใใใใ ใใใใ historically speaking people in your situation would raise children whose parents died in war or some other reason, not that you have to
Just speaking historically
you assume that the goal is a-priori true and a given and therefore the things necessary to achieve it are morally necessary
but the goal is not a-priori true and a given
it's arbitrarily chosen
and any other goal can be arbitrarily chosen
i want to, but why would i do so if it means i have to do so in some specific way
if imma take on the burden of caring for some dipshits kids, then im doing it my way
what if I want my PC to be a cupholder
then the ideal place to put the RAM is very different
Its instinctual not moral
Wanting to advance and have children is a base instinct
following instinct is not necessarily good
you choose it as a good
I'm not saying its good.
Its amoral
Its nature
any justification you choose to use has alternatives
no matter what
there is no necessary point of view
humanity is a disease on this planet, humans alone are the direct cause the extinction of over 9,000 different species
^
Those species weren't strong enough to make it
if were going by whats moral, humans need to be removed
yes but there is a right and wrong
we are a tumor
Its not our fault they didn't wipe us out
right and wrong are necessarily determined by your arbitrarily chosen ideals
They should have been smarter and stronger
they cant wipe.us out
were a malignant tunor
176,082 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 25/705
| Next