#general (Discord ID: 634367565304561675) in JFG.world, page 2791
Security Advisory: Links in messages may lead to maliciously operated websites that could track your IP address and reveal your identity, or they may contain harmful files. The DiscordLeaks team does not check links and cannot make any statements about the safety of following these links.
Some ways to protect yourself are:
- Do not open files downloaded from links, and do not run any programs that try to download themselves to your computer.
- Use anonymization measures such as Tor Browser or a VPN.
If you are using the Privacy Badger or other privacy extensions, you may need to whitelist Discord and related domains in order for the images to load.
throw the race deniers off the earth disk!
You can't duck bullets
Their denial of reality will be tested for its efficacy
My argument, if it succeeds, makes it impossible for you to make an positive claims, immobilizing you.
Can they warp reality and deflect the bullets that way
Basically, as a black person would say, I am about to break your ankles.
Can we go back to the Woman Question
Race Question got boring
Big Ben, are you still there?
someone here doesnt believe in race?
Big Ben is a skeptic.
Yo guys I watch rationality rules
I learned so much
I havent watched his stuff with Sargone
About being a skeptic
I only know him because of his battle with Molymeme
Also you can have a centrist position on cuckoldry
I hope I did not scare Ben off. : (
You guys should read David Hume if u wanna pure skepticism. This is pseudo skepticism
I learned so much about being a cuckold from Rationality Rules
the answer to the women question is that the premises of feminism were equalitarian ideology which is not based on science - that it sought to undo naturally emergent systems which had prevailed for thousands of years with utterly disasterous consequences
I think I was getting somewhere.
also the question is nonsense because it talks about rights
the premise can just be individualism
Rights oy vey
"take each person as an individual"
What if rights don't exist
>implying they exist
And if they do exist
why should they be equal
feminism is actually more rooted in Marxism than individualist liberalism
now, of course, shitlibs get confused and can't help be mix up equal opportunity with equality of outcome
because none of these principles is actually right or wrong
I honestly root feminism as a dysfunctional personality type. Ugh
both principles are useless
again, it's just people using talking points to win arguments
Why have equality of opportunity or outcome
yes, witches originated it
They are impossible to achieve
Hey, I can get away with making fun of feminism in front of feminist.
witches and simps
Rights? More like.. state granted privileges
You cant get equality of opportunity, what does that even mean
I didn't mean to scare Big Ben off.
burning witches was a good social practice which we can cogently defend
Even if you gave 2 different individuals the exact same resources
@The Living Paradox English philosophers are more or less an oxymoron, the language just is crap for it (or brits have all braindamage)
Their opportunities arent gonna be the same
(Cuz they arent the same)
witch burning was the medieval THOT patrol
Thing is once you accept Equality of Opportunity
The Jew only has to push a little bit for you to enter the Outcome mode
if you think that people aren't equal, then you're a bad person
I mean, ain't it obvious, why they use all that empirial measurement shit?
therefore people are equal
The Inquisitors killed off mutants, essentially atheists and liberals.
so we need affirmative action
what equality exists
I think the Inquisition kill count is in the millions.
what kind of equality can we prove exists in the human world
because they are so fucking rational, so good a measuring and that's the end of their intellectual endevours
i still havent heard a justification for anarcho-capitalism. How can someone believe in that. I mean sure anarchy will give rise to order at some point
but how the fuck will anarchy and capitalism work
that doesnt make any sense
Anarcho-Capitalism isnt against order
Its just the ordering is different
chance to get burned as a witch was about 1.000.000 : 1
can you explain how exactly
The economic agents order themselves instead of central appointed or ordained authority which has monopolistic powers
better try to becme metoo'ed
and protestants don't forget protestants
another british lie campaign
gotta get rid of those
Simple, its in their interests to order themselves
Protestants are the chads.
targeted at continental europe and the CC
If people steal and kill and whatever
Everyone will end up miserable
But if we decide to not do these things, we will thrive
So basically chaos, because anyone can go in your private property and kill you. There is 0 rules and there is no order
Protestants recanted their schismatic nonsense screaming on the rack
I think we know who the chads were
Everyone has the right to wipe out anyone who goes into your property
And people will band together to wipe out property violators
Protestantism is literally due to the Black Plague and the elevation of European IQ. Protestantism is the product of the peak of European IQ.
The government isnt a special entity that provides a protection aura, its their weapons
As soon as the Black Plague ended, the Reformation happened.
the weapons protect
so give the property owners the weapons, and their specialized defense firms, perhaps they can band together in covenants for their own protection
43.240 als Hexer/n angeklagte Menschen;
16.333 Menschen, die im Ergebnis hingerichtet werden;
Daten aus 21 europäischen Ländern für
den Zeitraum von 1300 bis 1850;
Informationen aus 37 Datenquellen;
the men will coalesce into groups of power-to-deny-power aka states and your "private defense agency" will be a defacto govt yes very nice
I do not think Big Ben is making any progress. He keeps leaving when I show up. :/
43000 accusation, 10000 court cases and that over 500 years
It wont have monopolistic powers, it wont be able to set the price and than compel you to pay up
Thats the key difference
And until that happens there will be a civil war where everyone kills someone and mafia members will run the streets killing everyone in their path
"The defense agency"
there will be no capitalism
neither do states-to-federal gov't, especially if you adhere to rothbardian ethics, where blackmail isnt coercion
Civil wars are to take over states
States/Federal Govt sets the price of your protection
the federal govt is merely blackmailing the states to pay some protection dues and follow federal law
Thats without question
well, so what? theyre not being forced
they can secede anytime
but they blackmail monopolistically
so bascially you have to be either half-med aka bavarian or a calvinist dutch to burn witches
>The states can secede at any time
republican needs to be educated
rothbard says blackmail isn't bad
Blackmail is a border issue
It doesnt directly violate the NAP
hitler said to kill the jew
only people with an IQ above 150 understand the democrats
I hope trump is impeached
federal states exist voluntarily
But if you act on the blackmail with force
Thats where the line is crossed
@Chawosaurian At some point they will choose someone to run the state of the community
They will arise naturally
They will just not monopolize all power
That was the mistake
its a natural monopoly, its what we have
Not really natural
if it were more expedient* (economical) to have another the states can secede
And does it have to be a monopoly at all
they don't, so it's economical to keep it
Cant the judges and the security just act in a fair competitive manner
man, rothbardian ethics sucks i hate talking in it
tfw statists literally admit to committing a naturalistic fallacy
Which is the only way they will have any incentive to self-improve
i hate that you take me seriously too lol
the current judicial is pretty independent as is
the very top isn't
They are a state enforced monopoly
but state level, local level are
What about no morre
well it wouldn't make much of a difference imo
The degenerative monopolistic scenario?
Big Ben is back. : D
they are a state payed and by thugs influenced monopoly
at least here
if people are too lazy to revolt and establish a fair system, because it isn't economical for them to do it now, it wouldn't be in a different system either
a supply/demand deal isn't it
people just aren't demanding justice enough
Sure the monopolist may make it comfy enough for his subjects so they stay quiet
@Ozpin88 btw, did you agree with me that epistemically, race is socially constructed?
yes just as every word
That doesnt really say anything about anything
the monopolist can push a bit
He has his limit
but only upto secession or revolutionary threat
Which is why its a general rule
that every ruler needs popular support on his side to rule
When talking about ethics, are you guys moral realist, nihilists, or subjectivists?
This will continue until you get some odd post-humanist realms appaer
Is Rothbard a moral realist?
but it's like, everyone in every system will push for self interest, it's not like the PDA's don't or can't erect certain barriers of entry
no more options?
than the laws that usually apply to human affairs may start disintegrating
everyone raises as much barriers they can to free-ride as much as they can
@TuerSchlossEnteiser not really, they can all fit under those three categories, all the sub categories that is.
There need to be automatic mechanisms to cull parasites
Or minimize it
yeah. well. propertarianism claims being able to do that.
and im not gonna shill
but anyway. rothbardian ethics isn't the solution lol
Hoppe improved them anyway
allowing blackmail isn't the solution 😒
I am not a propertarian but propertarianism is probably the biggest brain you can get as a libertarian.
Hoppe, hoppe Reiter?
hoppe is an improvement yeah
Wenn er fällt dann schreit er?
Hoppe is the more based version
voluntarism is the end of philosophy
We disproved argument from agreement in epistemology lectures, but... I dont remember what the subject was about. There was a whole movement related to the social construct argument. Basically the professor was like "we agree that the sky is green.", "do you guys agree that the sky is green?" everyone said yes and he was like "alright the sky is green, we are done".
And isnt a Jew
There is someone with the same pfp as me. XD
Hoppe is German Austrian
Basically there is no productivity at all in that argument
L O L
Poor Hector and his clones
Too many hectors
It's one of my favorite art works based off the Illiad
i stole it from u
Hector is one of my favorite literature pieces.
there's a Hoppe Song!!!!
Wait, I remember you now!!!
That last pfp was ugly. I see you upgraded.
i like that picture too
but epistemology in general is fucking retarded. The basis for epistemology to accept anything is the correspondence theory of truth