throw the race deniers off the earth disk!

You can't duck bullets

Maybe

Their denial of reality will be tested for its efficacy

My argument, if it succeeds, makes it impossible for you to make an positive claims, immobilizing you.

Can they warp reality and deflect the bullets that way

Basically, as a black person would say, I am about to break your ankles.

https://youtu.be/wUw7mo6CeVw

Lol

Can we go back to the Woman Question

WQ

Race Question got boring

Big Ben, are you still there?

someone here doesnt believe in race?

Big Ben is a skeptic.

<:sargone:576555026722586635>

skeptic

Lmao

Yo guys I watch rationality rules

I learned so much

Armoured Skeptic

I havent watched his stuff with Sargone

About being a skeptic

Watch siege

I only know him because of his battle with Molymeme

Also you can have a centrist position on cuckoldry

I hope I did not scare Ben off. : (

You guys should read David Hume if u wanna pure skepticism. This is pseudo skepticism

I learned so much about being a cuckold from Rationality Rules

the answer to the women question is that the premises of feminism were equalitarian ideology which is not based on science - that it sought to undo naturally emergent systems which had prevailed for thousands of years with utterly disasterous consequences

I think I was getting somewhere.

: (

Yes

@Chawosaurian no

also the question is nonsense because it talks about rights

the premise can just be individualism

Yes

@Big Ben still here, buddy?

Rights oy vey

"take each person as an individual"

What if rights don't exist

>implying they exist

And if they do exist

why should they be equal

feminism is actually more rooted in Marxism than individualist liberalism

now, of course, shitlibs get confused and can't help be mix up equal opportunity with equality of outcome

because none of these principles is actually right or wrong

I honestly root feminism as a dysfunctional personality type. Ugh

both principles are useless

again, it's just people using talking points to win arguments

Why have equality of opportunity or outcome

yes, witches originated it

They are impossible to achieve

Hey, I can get away with making fun of feminism in front of feminist.

witches and simps

Rights? More like.. state granted privileges

You cant get equality of opportunity, what does that even mean

<:supermale:399903458964275203>

I didn't mean to scare Big Ben off.

: (

burning witches was a good social practice which we can cogently defend

Even if you gave 2 different individuals the exact same resources

@The Living Paradox English philosophers are more or less an oxymoron, the language just is crap for it (or brits have all braindamage)

Their opportunities arent gonna be the same

(Cuz they arent the same)

witch burning was the medieval THOT patrol

Thing is once you accept Equality of Opportunity

The Jew only has to push a little bit for you to enter the Outcome mode

if you think that people aren't equal, then you're a bad person

I mean, ain't it obvious, why they use all that empirial measurement shit?

therefore people are equal

The Inquisitors killed off mutants, essentially atheists and liberals.

Kek

so we need affirmative action

tbh

what equality exists

I think the Inquisition kill count is in the millions.

what kind of equality can we prove exists in the human world

because they are so fucking rational, so good a measuring and that's the end of their intellectual endevours

i still havent heard a justification for anarcho-capitalism. How can someone believe in that. I mean sure anarchy will give rise to order at some point

@Hector its 2500

but how the fuck will anarchy and capitalism work

that doesnt make any sense

Anarcho-Capitalism isnt against order

Its just the ordering is different

chance to get burned as a witch was about 1.000.000 : 1

can you explain how exactly

@TuerSchlossEnteiser dang, i though it would be much higher

The economic agents order themselves instead of central appointed or ordained authority which has monopolistic powers

better try to becme metoo'ed

and protestants don't forget protestants

another british lie campaign

gotta get rid of those

Simple, its in their interests to order themselves

Protestants are the chads.

targeted at continental europe and the CC

If people steal and kill and whatever

Everyone will end up miserable

But if we decide to not do these things, we will thrive

So basically chaos, because anyone can go in your private property and kill you. There is 0 rules and there is no order

Wrong

Protestants recanted their schismatic nonsense screaming on the rack

I think we know who the chads were

Everyone has the right to wipe out anyone who goes into your property

And people will band together to wipe out property violators

Protestantism is literally due to the Black Plague and the elevation of European IQ. Protestantism is the product of the peak of European IQ.

The government isnt a special entity that provides a protection aura, its their weapons

As soon as the Black Plague ended, the Reformation happened.

the weapons protect

so give the property owners the weapons, and their specialized defense firms, perhaps they can band together in covenants for their own protection

https://sciencefiles.org/2020/01/08/die-hexenverbrennung-war-fur-kirchen-virtue-signalling-marketing/?highlight=hexen


43.240 als Hexer/n angeklagte Menschen;
10.805 Hexenprozesse;
16.333 Menschen, die im Ergebnis hingerichtet werden;
Daten aus 21 europäischen Ländern für
den Zeitraum von 1300 bis 1850;
Informationen aus 37 Datenquellen;

the men will coalesce into groups of power-to-deny-power aka states and your "private defense agency" will be a defacto govt yes very nice

I do not think Big Ben is making any progress. He keeps leaving when I show up. :/

43000 accusation, 10000 court cases and that over 500 years

It wont have monopolistic powers, it wont be able to set the price and than compel you to pay up

Thats the key difference

And until that happens there will be a civil war where everyone kills someone and mafia members will run the streets killing everyone in their path

"The defense agency"

there will be no capitalism

neither do states-to-federal gov't, especially if you adhere to rothbardian ethics, where blackmail isnt coercion

Civil wars are to take over states

States/Federal Govt sets the price of your protection

the federal govt is merely blackmailing the states to pay some protection dues and follow federal law

https://i1.wp.com/sciencefiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Leespn-Russ-witch-trial-2.png?w=643&ssl=1

Thats without question

well, so what? theyre not being forced

yes

they can secede anytime

Lol

(:

but they blackmail monopolistically

so bascially you have to be either half-med aka bavarian or a calvinist dutch to burn witches

>The states can secede at any time

They tried

republican needs to be educated

rothbard says blackmail isn't bad

Technically

and?

touche libertard

Blackmail is a border issue

It doesnt directly violate the NAP

yeah. so.

hitler said to kill the jew

only people with an IQ above 150 understand the democrats

I hope trump is impeached

federal states exist voluntarily

But if you act on the blackmail with force

Thats where the line is crossed

@Chawosaurian At some point they will choose someone to run the state of the community

They will arise naturally

they have

They will just not monopolize all power

That was the mistake

its a natural monopoly, its what we have

Not really natural

and?

if it were more expedient* (economical) to have another the states can secede

And does it have to be a monopoly at all

they don't, so it's economical to keep it

Cant the judges and the security just act in a fair competitive manner

man, rothbardian ethics sucks i hate talking in it

tfw statists literally admit to committing a naturalistic fallacy

Which is the only way they will have any incentive to self-improve

i hate that you take me seriously too lol

the current judicial is pretty independent as is

lol!

Independent kek

the very top isn't

They are a state enforced monopoly

but state level, local level are

What about no morre

well it wouldn't make much of a difference imo

@Chawosaurian that's the better scenario xD

Which

The degenerative monopolistic scenario?

Big Ben is back. : D

they are a state payed and by thugs influenced monopoly

at least here

if people are too lazy to revolt and establish a fair system, because it isn't economical for them to do it now, it wouldn't be in a different system either

a supply/demand deal isn't it

people just aren't demanding justice enough

Sure the monopolist may make it comfy enough for his subjects so they stay quiet

@Ozpin88 btw, did you agree with me that epistemically, race is socially constructed?

yes just as every word

👍

That doesnt really say anything about anything

the monopolist can push a bit

He has his limit

but only upto secession or revolutionary threat

yeah

Which is why its a general rule

that every ruler needs popular support on his side to rule

When talking about ethics, are you guys moral realist, nihilists, or subjectivists?

This will continue until you get some odd post-humanist realms appaer

Is Rothbard a moral realist?

but it's like, everyone in every system will push for self interest, it's not like the PDA's don't or can't erect certain barriers of entry

no more options?

than the laws that usually apply to human affairs may start disintegrating

everyone raises as much barriers they can to free-ride as much as they can

@TuerSchlossEnteiser not really, they can all fit under those three categories, all the sub categories that is.

There need to be automatic mechanisms to cull parasites

Or minimize it

yeah. well. propertarianism claims being able to do that.

and im not gonna shill

but anyway. rothbardian ethics isn't the solution lol

Hoppe improved them anyway

allowing blackmail isn't the solution 😒

I am not a propertarian but propertarianism is probably the biggest brain you can get as a libertarian.

Hoppe?

wrong

Hoppe, hoppe Reiter?

lol no

hoppe is an improvement yeah

Wenn er fällt dann schreit er?

german ethics

Hoppe is the more based version

voluntarism is the end of philosophy

We disproved argument from agreement in epistemology lectures, but... I dont remember what the subject was about. There was a whole movement related to the social construct argument. Basically the professor was like "we agree that the sky is green.", "do you guys agree that the sky is green?" everyone said yes and he was like "alright the sky is green, we are done".

And isnt a Jew

unlike Rothbard

Wait

voluntary naziism

There is someone with the same pfp as me. XD

Hoppe is German Austrian

who

Basically there is no productivity at all in that argument

@Walhalla you and I have the same pfp. Xd

Welcome, brother.

kek

👀

L O L

Poor Hector and his clones

Too many hectors

It's one of my favorite art works based off the Illiad

:based:

i stole it from u

Hector is one of my favorite literature pieces.

there's a Hoppe Song!!!!

https://tenor.com/view/kekw-kek-bttv-twitch-emote-gif-15123134

https://youtu.be/-lSndZ7cAgU

Wait, I remember you now!!!

lol

That last pfp was ugly. I see you upgraded.

tatat

:glass\

😎

i like that picture too

but epistemology in general is fucking retarded. The basis for epistemology to accept anything is the correspondence theory of truth