sweet!

learned something new

word of the day`1

NICE

Me definitely

Confirmed

ima tell my girl that

baby you make me uncephalized

@Just for youtube [NB1]
Waiting for the call back.
@Big T
See, that's funny.

Are you talking about writing safety courses off on taxes @Mandatory Carry?

Happy to give credit to you on that part of your whole thing. I just don't want fees and fines for people who don't want in on your program.

lol always douche beforehand and there wont be any excremenet

@Just for youtube [NB1]
"The point made about a tax break for those that carry instead of a tax increase for those that dont is good."
No.

@Legalize
*"Judge not lest ye be judged yourself; **And by the measure ye judge, so shalt ye* be *judged."***
So, unless a doctor says otherwise, I choose not to judge.

*EHEM;* If, on the other hand, you can get a currently practicing psychologist to corroborate your claim, I will yeild. I already conceed, however, that some dodomites are, in fact, mentally ill.
I'm one of them (PTSD).

@Legalize youre referring to gay sex. i am not. dont have random gay sex with strangers and your chances of getting hiv drop to near zero

🆙 | **BigTravis leveled up!**

not to mention wrap it up boys

Yeah the STD problem isn't a biggie if you're behaving responsibly enough/don't get assaulted

^

and dont do drugs/share needles

pretty basic stuff really

Don't do drugs that require needles

yea or that

Problem solved :^)

lol

Oh and shared crack pipes are a no as well

lol those burns

But you know, still a lot of options open

haha totes

Gays would probably argue it's natural since the prostate is an erogenous zone.

Now urethral sounds are truly disgusting shit.

broooo

seriously. i cant even see that shit

its like youre sticking what where??

I think homosexuality is something more of a developmental or genetic disorder. Humans are sexually dimorphic and it’s obvious that heterosexual sex is necessary for reproduction. So it would follow that a deviation from heterosexuality would be a disorder.

What if the species benefits from having non competing males?

That's actually a pretty fair point @Beemann

Historically a large portion of men had to either share prostitutes, fuck men, or be celibate if they weren't powerful.

How does that address my point?

Literally any disorder could fit that bill.

Non interest is more cohesive, and paired partners operate better

Ok. Humans are pretty split down the middle between males and females.

Basically there’s a man for every woman.

I don't think it is supposed to address your point @Salacious Swanky Cat other than that it could be viewed as an evolutionary strategy for survival over a strict disorder.

Only if you're a robot

Lol. It’s not an evolutionary strategy

theres actually a computer science problem related to this

Why would it be?

Stable Marriage problem

The same way cooperation is an evolutionary strategy

Having a dedicated partner for life has a host of health benefits

Yeah. Cool. I don’t see how this makes homosexuality less a disorder.

Depends on what you define a disorder as.

Based on what I argued earlier

But then anyone who doesn't have kids has a disorder

Time for #enforcedmonogamy

No. Not the case.

Yeah without some form of enforced monogamy men tend to have multiple partners

The point I’m arguing is that developing homosexuality is the result of a flaw in genetics or something happened during development.

If anything, should we go based on pure instinct, we should all be fat and promiscuous

Except we aren’t

Our brains are hardwired for fat and sugar, and men are not wired for mate selection in the same way we consider beneficial now

Ok. So what.

You haven’t disproved my point.

So on the basis of raw reproduction men should be polyamorous or promiscuous

Not inherently because men are necessary to raise children

No they're not

Pump and dump is incorrect

Yes they are.

They are not necessary for raising children.

They are extremely beneficial to their development, but not strictly necisarry

Yes. Necessary.

After the child is no longer dependant on a mother for sustenance the mother is not necessary either.

Humans are social creatures.

Necessary would mean that the child will not develop without both parents

If we're going on raw reproductive viability a small number of men should bone most of the wahmen

That’s an assumption

It's provable. Look at how promiscuity in the modern era has worked out

Humans aren’t the only long term monogamist creatures.

Look at incels

Promiscuity is bad.

Thanks for agreeing

Only in a western context

On what basis? It optimizes chances for conception

So if homosexuality is a 0, promiscuity is a 10

Uh no.

Why isn't it?

It is for genetic repopulation.

Because men participate in rearing the child.

They don't have to

Pump and dump is not good.

Your Gene's have a much higher chance of survival by boning multiple women.

Ok. And how does that address my point on homosexuality?

Women benefit from a stable spouse far more than men do.

It doesn’t

Because you don't agree with the position you named

You don't actually hold reproductive capacity to be the be all end all

So it's dishonest to use it to judge disorders

@DJ_Anuz no shit. Women will select a mate who wants monogamy.

They clearly don't do this normally