Music numbers felt like stans alone music videos, there was no real build up or villain, the bad guy was some random in the past mentioned twice, there was no sacrifice because everyone was saved and so was the cities buildings, and there was not real "earning" of anything

Visuals were noce I guess?

Yeah LMFAO my thoughts exactly

Also I don't understand how beating up the spirits tame them

And how she freed them in the first place

And how Anna just happened to know exactly what to do

Yea was cofused by that. The spirits were like random animals that she beat up then became her pers?

Yeah lmfao

And then she somehow makes it so the kingdom doesn't get flooded

Was essentially just "to to place while listening to music" the movie

Ye

Idk how she even knew she freed the spirits?

Nor do i

"Oh yea symbols for elements must be that story told to me when I was 5"

Lol

The kingdom getting flooded then having the forrest people help rebuild or something would of been a much better pay off and story element

It would be more believable if the symbols were more streight forward and less abstract I guess

But to me I wouldn't be able to guess based off this

But yeah I agree with you

They shoulda let it flood then rebuild

She didn't even make an ice dam

The water just straight up disappeared

Very poorly executed

@Seesaw WAT, how do you suppose

Jobs have been reducing for a long time while productivity is doubling

Over 30-40 years

@Seesaw I'm too laggy effectively to speak but...
The empirics do not align with your claims...

And the projections seem reasonable to believe

I'm shit

It will create more jobs, yes. But that still creates job displacement

Wait, what... automation is creeping up on every industry

Even DOCTORS

If you appeal to plumbing, sure, but you still need to get into why plumbing has seen increase in wages / etc

More white collar workers have made there more demand for blue collar workers

There's an excess of white collar labor

I don't know the UK's contracting / infrastructure / civil engineering works so

If you're thinking about the UK, it might be a less massive problem...
But in America, it's an insanely realistic problem

A la: He brings up the number of truck drivers that may be displaced

It's like 15+mil truck drivers

What... just saying "It's not going to happen" isn't true...
It will happen, it's just when...

You should say argue that it's going to happen slowly or incrementally

AND IT HAS IN AVIATION

There's more demand probably for flight than in the past

So this argument fails because, of course, the absolute numbers of pilots will be higher

An airplane needs a lot less dynamic sensors so

The question is far more complex than
Airplane easier to automate
Car harder to automate
Therefore automation won't replace the users of these vehicles

Since the *demand for air travel* has increased since the 70s

Trucks are a massive part of the supply chain

I don't know all the history of the US supply chain and the economics behind it

But saying things can't change sounds silly... they have changed...
The economics of making engines and such more efficient since then

TRUCKS PLAY A HUGE PART IN THE US reeeeee

You're just assuming the conclusion that trucks won't be automated

Ok... and that's likely going to displace some percents of truck drivers, right?

So if 15 mil truck drivers... say only 10% are displaced. That's 1.5 mil

You're getting at the argument that it will free up capital to hire *more truck drivers* but

I don't think you see this trend in most ventures...

You're cutting costs... but by cutting the laborer out of it

I mean... this literally sounds like Marx's Organic composition meme....
But I don't know if you know about it

And you're leveraging a certain critique, that's been leveraged before... the automation frees up laborers *to do other things*

And that creates jobs

I don't see how it *necessarily creates jobs* though

It seems like there's a presupposition that there *will be more jobs* and I don't know how you're arriving on that conclusion

@Seesaw This is a huge tangent, but have you heard the meme of literally using a blimp full of helium in the atmosphere for transport?

It's been brought up

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-03-10/china-s-hoping-airships-will-revolutionize-air-transport

@Seesaw There seems like a foundation though... you think he's wrong
I think he's right

But how about the rest of his policies... they all seem relatively reasonable to me

Aerospace is one industry though... granted that works as a model, yes

Yeah... but you can't fully trust the system *anyway*
If I insert, you can't fully trust a human...

So you only need the system to *perform better than a human*

But fails in strange ways, right?

Law of unintended consequence

Sure, that's fine... capitalists are still going to push automation

rip

Goodnyaght eveynyan! The number of people that are kidnapped and never found is frightening. I'm running out of energy even though I do nothing. I feel bad for the people who actually work hard and have to read my drivel.

dated sexism in this anime im watching

i hate this

buttmad

News at 8: Japan has tradcons too

yeah i know

but i dont like seeing it

and theyre actually more tradcon the US

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/595870992476274688/658539861782822922/EMaX5I-WkAIGPR_.png?width=467&height=475 lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XV1U-O6w5JI

I hate this human being already @Deleted User why are you like this

> politicians
> making media events
Yeah? That's always been what their meme is supposed to be... getting people to ... you know... participate in the democracy? <:Feelsweirdman:644895953064820776>

no i dislike this guy

hes like a crypto

but his content is very well produced imo

Ok and yeah. I picked it up already in 30 seconds...
When he's speaking derisively of her

Politicians are effectively nothing more than talking heads

And those talking heads write law, etc and it gets enforced, nothing more...

If anything, if people were actually valuing democracy, they would want to put these people under surveillance *basically 24/7* so they can't have conversations behind closed doors, cannot have shady transactions / quid quo pro, etc

But it seems that people don't actually care about that

Too early

@sydtko who would watch that

@Deleted User AND YE TYOU POsTED IT

REEEEEEEE

Oh, you're saying as in watching politicians?

I think it's entirely possible that intelligence agencies monitor politicians to some extent *already* ... there's a NYT articles out where you can literally see where Donald Trump was at some dates via his cell phone... so ..... yeah