Good

The world breathed a sigh of relief.

@Attika Me when espousing the virtues of democratic republics...

Yes

if only you knew how bad it really is

No.

@Attika Try to avoid stringing anyone up in the future.

🤔

Damn.

Lynchings are my favorite.

😭

<:cringe:591181675426217995> <:shoot:591451983647473707>

jesus hates sodomites

I wanna talk about something nice

I don’t care

@Attika He better love me. I still honor, like, slightly more than half of his ten step program. More than can be said for most supposed Christians.

You can’t take people’s money away just because they have more of it

wrong actually

@DrRisen I’m sure he does. Lols

No.

Right.

incorrect

If they earned the money fair and square

You can’t take their money away.

At least not morally.

morality gay
power better

@Attika I mean, yes and no. I can, easily in fact, the question is *should* I.

Yeah lols

Morally.

Morality is what makes us human

libertarians be like wow my parents are starving and jobless? wow sounds like a them problem

moral time

my golden toilet is more important than my fellow countrymen starving

^

It is

ebin subscribble to ben shakira

Libertarians are liberals, and liberalism must be destroyed

If I earned that golden fair and square.

libtard destroyer 3000

Then my fellow countrymen cannot take it from me.

That’s the harsh truth.

they will tho lol

It’s immoral.

And should not happen

Respect private property

Arguably yes. They will still live excellent lives if we take it away, and then improve other lives with that wealth. On the other hand if you don’t take the wealth that one person will be slightly more happy but many people will be much more miserable quite possibly in danger of death. @Attika Do the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few when the sacrifice from the few is so little for them, but the benefit is so great for the many?

This is individualism

and individualism is cancer

communists are definitely gonna take your gold toothbrush bro

@Wubbzo No they won't, that's immoral

there is a difference between private property and personal property

@DrRisen if they want to give it away. They can. And I probably would. But no, you cannot forcibly take someone’s private property away.

Why do people think that about communism/socialism
“if we have socialism bro you gotta share your toothbrush”

https://youtu.be/kLWvu51Vk4E?t=127 @Attika

@Shiba Inu hey get back to me when you own things worth protecting. 👍🏻 you’ll change your tune.

@Attika We can and do. It’s called taxes. What your question should be is how much can we take away before it’s considered unreasonable.

@Attika the majority of communists only advocate for seizing businesses and not personal items

@DrRisen taxes I’m okay with. Minute taxes. But that’s fine.

What communist would advocate for seizing personal items

@Wubbzo lols. So just take away their livelyhood?

That’s evil.

Communism is evil.

Stalin was pretty based

you cant stab ken lewis with a knife whilst he is walking around washington DC thats immoral!!!

@DoobyCooby typically only war communism

IE Khmer Rogue

since they were in a state of war

See, but therein lies your problem. Where is the line between ok and too much? Who has the right to decide where that line is? @Attika

Hey unless you’re buisness is a small buisness, you frick’d

These are questions that need to be answered.

Stalin was indeed pretty based, Blight

@DrRisen I think the government could live off of 5% taxes.

"wtf you forced everyone who is homeless to get a job and gave them housing? that's objectively evil to give away that billionaire's 4th mansion!"

During wartime taxes could be raised

the main issues with communist state shas been that they denied biology leading to disastrous famines and expropriations

hah

what

@Wubbzo yeah. Yeah it is. It’s taking someone’s private property. Sure it may seem morally objective, but seriously, it’s evil to take someone’s private property like that. To just seize it for no justification. Seize something people have worked long and hard for.

@Attika a lot of people just inherit a lot of money

So?

Morality is rooted in logic, yes?

they didn't work for it almost at all

You shouldn’t take away family inheritances either.

That’s evil also.

I think it depends

No.

No depends

I want to leave my children behind something they can build something bigger out of.

@Attika Is that a flat tax?

Taking away family inheritances is all around pretty screwed up.

@DrRisen no.

But 5% roughly is what the government could and should operate on. Higher during wartime or economic problems, but it should always revert back to 5% roughly.

libtard

Roughly....

So who gets the short end of the stick? The rich? Poor? Middle class?

Upper and middle class naturally.

rape

Poor should be encouraged out of poverty.