Oh if you want to come up with some more nicknames for me, I'll gladly give you some fuel.

I'm also a furry and I love anime.

1, 2, 3, go!

Nice one you gay animal fucking weeb

lol

Now, here's something else

I have a fetish for being called names

R.I.P.

At least it isn't Concrete Enemas, gay cunt

lol

Gay Cunt. Nice.

It's not even creative

You should come up with a creative one like "Your Faggotness"

No.

It's natural Strayan.

It's authentic.

Gay cunt

h-hey

remember

sentri

???

Ye

He's pre cool

How about "your supreme gayness"

Your supreme gay cunt faggot.

Ayyyyy lmao

oh baby, yeah

Nah, I've known plenty of furries

Even worse, I worked for a Brony con for a couple years

Or "Your supreme furrycunt faggot".

dude, I hate to be the one to say this

but that's gay

Funny thing is that the organisers were really cool dudes.

I was a good friend of the owner of "Auscons" and he's a cool dude.

Also ectremely gay

I hung out with a couple big name voice actors and drew them stupid pictures and fed them "Gaytimes", australian Icecreams

I like how you spelled extremely in such a way that it sounds a bit like a gay lisp

Fuck off cunt I'm about 3/4 through a bottle of whiskey

lol

man can't hold his wiskey

jk, it takes about one shot and I can't even stand.

I can get through a bottle and a half no worries

Mind you, that's not a good thing when it's fucking expensive to get shitfaced

When I get drunk I get 10x gayer and also 10x nicer

dude I can get a bottle of whiskey for nothing here

Cheap whiskeyyyyyyy

I'm actually more likely to head into intellectual debates

it tastes like shit though

I have intellectual debates when I'm sober

I debate a lot of religious folks

_also reads a shit ton of philosophy works_

Last time I got shitfaced at a party I started talking about the intricacies of the psychologies of Ted Bundy, Jeffrey Dahmer and Edd Gein, as well as their influences on the character Hannibal Lector as well as other popular cultural characters

That made most of the older people decide it was home time

I don't know much about psychology. Evolutionary biology, physics, and philosophy are what I like talking about

Hey

Tell me about Plato's 'Forms' and tell me how in any way shape or form they are relevant when compared to today's scientific understanding of the human mind

I know about Plato's forms but that's really not something I'd be good at. Still got a lot to learn about the modern scientific understanding of the human mind.

Philosophy of consciousness is one thing I haven't dug into yet, however,

I'm beginning that journey by reading "Consciousness Explained" By Daniel Dennett

If you could suggest some further reading I'd be grateful.

Don't get me started on Decante

However, I do remember Dawkins writing about how Plato's forms may have held back evolutionary theory.

Since people were more likely to think of animals such as a cat, having some ideal of "cat"

Rather than just being a transitional species in between one branch of an ever-growing evolutionary tree

With no real "ideal" animal

I've honestly found that philosophy is interesting as a historical reference of the mentality of scholars from particular time periods, as well as an idea of how political and scholarly principals formed throughout intellectual history.

I have a question for you.

Since you're 3/4ths through a whiskey bottle.

Do you understand what you just wrote?

i do

I do too, but does HE

hes clint eastwood

he can understand anything

lol

Of course I understand what I'm talking about.

the niggas got punctuation

hes good

Give me an example of "political and scholarly principals" or define it, if you will.

I have a particularly ellegant form of writing when I'm speaking in an intellectual/philosophical form of speaking

principles or principals?

Good for you. My teachers have told me I am eloquent on my papers

TO answer your question, I would consider political principles ideological towards the way one must conduct themselves, or would suggest a collective of individuals to conduct themselves based on a specific ideology.

In regards to what would be considered 'Scholarly principals', I believe they would be defined as being ideas or concepts that are presented by an individual with intentions to be informative of one's conduct, but nonetheless up for debate to an intellectual community.

The Scholarly principals being what the current ideological movement was at the time you are setting this in?

Okay dude, let's tone down the eloquence and instead focus on being precise

but i was having fun

Ok then

The first one is 'Belive what I say, shitcunts'

And the other one is 'This is what I believe, shitcunts, have fun with it'

Also I understood what you said, it's just that so much of what you said was unecessary information.

For example

"but nonetheless up for debate to an intellectual community."

then whats the point of being eloquent xD

woohoo, im getting $311 dollars back from tax returns!!

this information did not add to your sentence

So scrap it.

I'm getting $650 back from tax returns. Yay! I'll be able to pay off some debt

Good sir i quite undoubtedly believe you are being unfairly biased towards this mans chosen way of wording and transcription.

He's saying a lot of pointless shit to look smart.

Ya ever been to congress

No, I agree, I do need to be able to concentrate my points into a more direct explaination

Philosophical discussions should be PRECISE. Spare your eloquence for poetry.

Yea true

lol nevermind

Mind you, that's a learning curve

wouldn't whever we end up be our destination, even if there's no story there? Or, to put it another way, is the story of no destination still a story?

Simply by the act of moving forward are we implying a journey such that a destination is inevitably conjured into being via the very manifestation of the nature of life itself?

Okay, I need to follow this train of thought for a minute, just stick with me.

I distance my coloquial language from formal language so much that I'm either too simple or far too long winded.