I have a particularly ellegant form of writing when I'm speaking in an intellectual/philosophical form of speaking

principles or principals?

Good for you. My teachers have told me I am eloquent on my papers

TO answer your question, I would consider political principles ideological towards the way one must conduct themselves, or would suggest a collective of individuals to conduct themselves based on a specific ideology.

In regards to what would be considered 'Scholarly principals', I believe they would be defined as being ideas or concepts that are presented by an individual with intentions to be informative of one's conduct, but nonetheless up for debate to an intellectual community.

The Scholarly principals being what the current ideological movement was at the time you are setting this in?

Okay dude, let's tone down the eloquence and instead focus on being precise

but i was having fun

Ok then

The first one is 'Belive what I say, shitcunts'

And the other one is 'This is what I believe, shitcunts, have fun with it'

Also I understood what you said, it's just that so much of what you said was unecessary information.

For example

"but nonetheless up for debate to an intellectual community."

then whats the point of being eloquent xD

woohoo, im getting $311 dollars back from tax returns!!

this information did not add to your sentence

So scrap it.

I'm getting $650 back from tax returns. Yay! I'll be able to pay off some debt

Good sir i quite undoubtedly believe you are being unfairly biased towards this mans chosen way of wording and transcription.

He's saying a lot of pointless shit to look smart.

Ya ever been to congress

No, I agree, I do need to be able to concentrate my points into a more direct explaination

Philosophical discussions should be PRECISE. Spare your eloquence for poetry.

Yea true

lol nevermind

Mind you, that's a learning curve

wouldn't whever we end up be our destination, even if there's no story there? Or, to put it another way, is the story of no destination still a story?

Simply by the act of moving forward are we implying a journey such that a destination is inevitably conjured into being via the very manifestation of the nature of life itself?

Okay, I need to follow this train of thought for a minute, just stick with me.

I distance my coloquial language from formal language so much that I'm either too simple or far too long winded.

I could speak in big words and long sentences too, but it wouldn't further the discussion nearly as much as being precise and only using as many big words and long sentences *as necessary to effectively communicate my point*.

Now we can agree that the nature of existence is, in fact, a byproduct of one's subjective experience of that existence, right?

I agree @Discobug

Okay, now if my experience of your existence rests inside of your subjective experience of this discord, is this discord, in fact, the skeleton of my own relative experiential mental subjective construct?

I think that Cosmo's a shitcunt ay

ay same

I think @Clunt Estwode is just gay for me. :>

we all shitcunts boi

BACK TO MINDLESS DROOL!

im gay bro

I'm gayer

i take 3 dicks for 50 bucks

I'd take 3 dicks for free