but compared to cigarettes, proving 5g has issues is like childs play

too many factors/variables

weve had internet and wifi for so long with no actual provable bad results, literally the same thing for internet ver. 5.0

(Even now cigs are still mostly circumstantial evidence.)

Pence slipped when he said that. i thought the slip up interesting

most shit attributed to internet sickness is self diagnosed vague shit

Godd Howard, that is the problem. You can't compare HAVING internet to NOT having internet

Quantum Jews

oh god

so i don't see how you can make that claim

it's called 'the measurement problem'

thats false equivocation

you effect that what you are trying to measure by taking the measurment

you cant tie current era problems to having internet

gg logical problems

without actual solid proof

how can you NOT 'tie the current era with having the internet'?

you might as well say the WW2 peace era increased autism rates because the numbers coincided

hey man

Being a Hoosier from Indiana I can say that him leaving and being VP has probably improved Indiana at least a little bit.

the current era IS the internet... everything that is everything relies on what the internet provides.. connectivity

i didn't say that

i said that you cannot SEPERATE the two factors

it's a falisification problem

https://youtu.be/80_r0VuB_wo

you still need to prove that problems now are tied to the internet other than a vague sense of "bad things happen in this era and therefore internet caused it"

'falsification problem'

you do understand what 'falsification' is in regards to an experiment, right?

anyone with a link to the question and answer part of the Social Media Summit? it got cut off in all the videos posted on youtube I tried (many)

What if 5g doubt is a pentagon psyop to weaken Chinese influence.

well, it IS concerning they can use the transmitters for real-time 3d mapping as well as sonic crowd control

I mean FBI browses 4chan

privacy? they know when you get up from your desk to take a DUMP and when you are whackin' it

I will give "concern" at the right word.

It's not like the pentagon gets upset enough to take action over nothing.

you disagree with the gov? they bring the hammer down on you

pentagon is for dealing with forgein countries no domestic issues

that USED to be the LAW.... then came the Patriot Act

#BringBackPosseCumatatis

Just keep in mind who might be allied to what side, involved or not.

that is kinda why i STRONGLY disagree with calling 'incitement' which is just WORDS 'criminal'. This will ALWAYS destory free-speech as it violates the Blackstone Formaulation and enables 'victim culture'

incitement is pretty clear dude

people have faculty and it is teh ACTOR which commits the crime never the SPEAKER

It's a crime because we don't want mobs being formed because some popular fuck doesn't like someone.

it is NOW, since the damn post-modern harrasssment statutes were passed

you don't understand the history of this country then

that is what the post-modernist have told you

Petty upset over someone pushing some radicals over the edge.

you know what is worth incitement to violence though

16 times the detail

that is NOT the historical position according to US LAW

"oh, a cute anime girl. I'm going to make this my profile pic"

tsuyu is hot as fuck

tbh

and by hot

so let me get this straight, if i have a decent following and i specifially tell people to go this person's address and commit crimes then i **shouldnt** be held accountable if some shithead actually does it?

damn right she is

i mean pretty

cuz she's only like 15

not a pedophile

she is still best female in academy

also she's cool

she isnt a fucking retard like the other females there

for now, but she'll be 16 soon and thats age of consent in canuckistan

like

who is the rich bitch that can make anything

she's smart but retarded

not 'upset' but alittle frustrated an alarmed no one sees the direct cause-effect of allowing the State to intervene with only 'incitement' and it's like to the presumption of innocence

the only other non retard is the headphone girl

you allow one, you lose the other

she is actually not stupid

kyoka jiro

thats her name

'those willing to sacrifice security for freedom....."

it's been a while : P

i dont know all the names

or most of the names tbh

hah

please stop posting about green crying naruto

fucking casual

Are you at fault for curing cancer if you get a decent following and one of the guys you told to do it actually does?

there is no "fault" in non criminal action

Or was it the guy who figured it out?

who is 'not stupid'?

notyou

you are quite stupid

dab

faco y dab

me telling you to dab epic style is diferent from me telling you to kill some dude

Fault, responsibility, pls.

do you even UNDERSTAND the Blackwater Formulation?

eu faço o dab

Doesn't seem like you even follow the argument.

But you ARE appealing to authority which is rather common these days

the Blackwater Formulation implies that the State will allow many more criminals to go free on a technicality rather than lock up a single innocent in the name of 'the greater good'

therefore, as a consequence, women required a community of good men to insulate them from those 'bad men' which the State has released based on the 'presumption of innocence'

the moment 'incitement' which is 'me speaking words ONLY without ACTION' can be actionable by the STATE, the State will begin trying to LEGISTLATE morality and will use that leverage to label any 'joke or critisizm' as ' threat'

Makes sense so far

So animal is fine with people whipping up a mob. Got it.

we now live in a world where i could see two kids playing in the street and out of concern go to the mother and say, "You should REALLY get your kids out the street before then get hit by a car" and the woman will interpret this as, "This man is threatening to run my kids down wiith his car!"

anyone can misisntpret a joke as a 'call to action'

thats pretty stupid

and the 'intent' isn't what qualifies something as 'incitement' only the INTERPRETATION

whether intented that way or not

I have a real smortphone now

@Ayylmao A person commanding someone to do something is not more or less responsible for the outcome simply because of a moral judgement on said outcome.

No it's cut and clear if I say to kill or damage a property that's incitement.

it was US law for almost a century

youre intentionally overblowing a simple situation into some sort of weird extremely autistic scenario

you are being naive and oversimplifying things assuming that people are more often like you, rational, rather than the opposite

if you are lucky, you get a 50/50 mix

That's because animal is probably autistic tbf to go though such mental gymnastics to justify incitement.

but i digress

nope. but i HAVE been misinterpreted BY autistics before and got in trouble for it

you'll learn, eventually..... ( if the left doesn't ruin everything first)

night

Sarcastic remarks exist, and so do things like dogwhistles and "the unknown" in general.

Get some rest those gymnastics are tiring.

A person decides to be a sheep.

It depends on what you’re specifically saying.

If you are say “Ladies and gentlemen, there is a *negro* outside, stealing your *bicycles! That’s the fellow, over yonder! His name is Tyrone! Tyrone, we’re coming for you, Tyrone! Quickly, ladies and gentlemen, accost that *negro*, Tyrone and we’ll have a good old fashioned lynching!”
Obvious incitement. Been illegal for hundreds of years. Not protected speech. At all.

If, on the other hand, you were to say “Ladies and Gentlemen, if you look at these statistics, you’ll clearly see that, as the *negro* population in a community rises, a proportionate rise in bicycle theft is observable.”
That’s not incitement. It’s... kinda douche, and depending on the motivation of the speaker, probably racist, but it’s not incitement.

more importantly to me
it's quite funny

The former has been, and rightly so, illegal forever.
The problem is that the *latter* is more and more being seen as synonymous with the former.

>When you joke about crime but he brings up Black crime statistics

*Winks at the camera*
Like AliG says, keep it real.

tbh most jokes are just humorously phrased statistics

>inb4 13do50

*what's the deeeal with airline food*

*Waves hands in a very Jewish fashion*
And how about daylight savings time? What’s up with thaaaaat?

The Jews are fine.
As are the blacks.
Race not important.
Only ideology important.

Cheers folks, gotta get back to work.

did a vox employee look over your shoulder?

Funny, I walk away for a moment and the conversation turns from space and the potential of mankind to free speech.

Nah it was animal's autism flaring up.

Hey guys can I get a quick opinion on something

From my current MP stellaris game

I need to know what you think of my cat

It may have been, but I'm still gonna pat myself on the back as encouraging peaceful interaction towarda the improvement of mankind.

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

@PhiloFusor the Omitted First class airline food is pretty decent. XD

Had meatballs in marinara and spinach on the first flight. >.>

@SageTheory. One more thing: The 'autism' that you speak of is what allows and continues to allow both Attorneys and the Left to run circles around you, being so few yet yielding so much influence. Of course, I understand that autistic interpretation IS a bit autistic but that IS the point. In the courtroom, the judge will ALWAYS follow LOGIC over common sense..... no matter how 'autistic' it might seem to the average person.

Erm. "Nutty ninth" I wish I could agree. @ManAnimal

Expecting the authorites to protect you from Antifa and not just look the other way when they have been given unchallenged power to do so... THAT is the true autism.

And let's avoid talking about.. well Portland and even moreso the UK.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3YF0cOqRdA4&feature=share

UK holy shit

understandable

UK put tommy Robinson in jail

really? (haven't heard anything in a good minute... been off the grid)

Holy shit

England has fallen to Islam

I do agree about the intent of the justice systems though.

Trump should have offered Tommy and his family asylum

But it's increasingly failing on the matter of.. well...justice.

Perhaps it is an extreme example, but in my view, that compartmentalization is the only way to keep the State honest

Dude I don't even know what you're on about anymore you spergy cunt.

It is, but the walls have failed.

now, the State is seen as the ONLY authority rather than the State being secondary to parents, grandparents and community which would influence, deter and even punish you outside of the long arms of the law

https://youtu.be/2vpa3V4-g5A LEAF DOES POLITICAL TEST (NOT CLICKBAIT) (GONE SEXUAL)

An agreeable observation. @ManAnimal

I mostly did this because people in another server kept trying to call me far-right, and I haven't done one of these in a while.

@ManAnimal Are you suggesting that the state should parent children more than their parents do?

Is/ought.

The United Caliphate of Al-England and Northern Ireland

noegative

It is that the State overrides the parents, the question is ought it be so?

i am saying the EXACT opposite

And I agree, that it ought *not* be so.

that it is IMPORTANT to have a 'grey zone' that the community has juristiction over

yes, everyone is subject to the law, BUT if no one finds out.....

the State needs to keep it's distance and that means a community must fill that void

@ManAnimal the state shouldn't exist

why can't the community have it's own laws

if you don't have that community, the vaccum will be filled with the State

that way it's offical

I would caveat that the State is neccessary.

and it's less potential for corruption

fill the void with community specific laws

because a community doesn't influence, reward nor enforce with 'laws'

that statment misses the point

LAW is explict

why can't it?

ETHICS is implict

Ethics are the basis for the laws

Community deals which ethics

Anyway be home in about 30 mikes..don't burn the server down in my absence.

the State deals with laws

these are totally different mechanism

I think your conception of "community" is flawed

I'm talking a group of individuals within a certain area

i can remember when we HAD 'community'

@Laucivol the state is not neccessary

small scale

(Also, stop boosting my ego. It's not helpful.)

whereas the state is a larger governing body

i am not so sure your grasp what i am refering to

you see to assume the "community" is the people

and the state is seperate

in the USA, we were ALWAYS defined by acceptance of certain core VALUES

community enforced these values and ridiculed those that didn't respect them

I'm saying you are missusing terms and my misunderstanding comes from his missuse

today, the mechanism of social ridcule has been hijacked

when you say "community" it appears to be that you are talking about the people

there is not community

and the state keeps filling the void

not a hypothetical community

But a concept of the people as a collective

which is wrong

don't talk to me if you are going to be a post-modernist

I'm not

yes, it is a concept which i labeled 'community'

is the the proper label? perhaps not

I'm saying that your miss use of the terms is creating issues with my understanding

that doesn't invalidate the concept

just the label

Well the concept is flawed

as well

but the post-modernist can't see past superfical labels

indeed we must have decentralized communties that makes their own laws, if we can achive this the state becomes unneccessary

which are you?

The state should exist just shouldn't intervene in domestic affairs as it does.

not 'laws'

and your miss use of the terms is hiding the fact that it is a flawed concept

we have the state for that

@SageTheory no it shouldn't exist at all

besides, 98% of life happens BEYOND the 'laws'

I can't explain why your concept is wrong without explaining that the terms you use are wrong

because if I didn't I'd have no way to explain why your concept is wrong

you don't learn killing is wrong because someone breaks the law and the state punishes you

How are we gonna go to war if we don’t have a state

Lol sorry ancap Utopia is retarded humans aren't built that way.

the community influences people to follow certain social norms that are aligned with the 'law' because law takes it's cue from community precedence

Humans are social creatures, so they'll inevitably create some sort of community.

ancap utopia existed

it was called kowloon walled city

and it was pretty ebic

@SageTheory AnCaps don't claim there way of doing things is "Utopia" retard

You have head cannoned this out of thin air, there is so much spaghetti in your statements @ManAnimal

sigh* if this is going to be an 'ancap argument' that is whole other argument

@Terry Arcona Well their ideal is utopian

anbrap

no, this was the way it was in the day of my PARENTS and GRANDPARENTS

1940-1985

How are we gonna have a Military without a state

@Muten not really, it's pretty practical if you really read up on it

>reading

Look if you can't explain it to a layman