Pakistan isnt in the middle east though

neither is Bangladesh, Indonesia

Central africa and Somalia

Yea, because those innocent men, women and children deserve to be glassed including the ones who aren't even Muslim. K

> Calling pakistanies asian

They aren't all going to die

They are going to become civilised

Mhm, so "glassing" doesn't mean turning the sand to glass with nuclear radiation heat, huh?

minna, suiyobi desu

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

"It just mean civilized you guys, I swear"

I like making you squirm lol

Total sperg

i'm with samaritan, let them glass the middle east

No u @Samaritan

Can't wait to have more "refugees" come to Europe

As a result.

i don't like israel i just hate palestine more tbh

https://tenor.com/view/middlefinger-fuckyouu-gif-4904551

super secret plan:

send the refugees to israel

They can stop in turkey or one of the other 7 countries they pass through

perfect plan

isreal has border control

>Israel who's bombing Syria

yes

we can learn some things

>Sending migrants to Europe

nvm

Can't wait

America, France and Uk who are also bombing Syria

let israel bomb the middle east then send the refugees into israel

perfect plan guys

Threaten to cut ALL funding to them if they don't take all the refugees in

Maybe they can stop supporting Terrorist attacks <:hyperthink:462282519883284480>

i disavow my own joke sbtw

If there are refugees you aren't bombing them hard enough

When you realize it's payback against Germany and Britain

I'd make dresden look like a fucking joke

I'm gonna make Hiroshima look like a fucking joke <:hypersmugon:544638648721604608>

I'm gonna make Nagasaki look like a fucking child's game <:hypersmugon:544638648721604608>

If only America and Russia tested their nukes on the real range during the cold war

ISRAEL <:hypersmugon:544638648721604608>

lol

Speaking of

What's wrong with Isreal

there was legit a retard in this server who said Israel didn't have nuke capabilities

<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

and hasn't ever

tbh negev chan is cute

even though the CIA has said they've had nuke capabilities since the 1960s

oddly enough

Israel is widely believed to have been the sixth country in the world to develop nuclear weapons, but has not acknowledged its nuclear forces. It had "rudimentary, but deliverable," nuclear weapons available as early as 1966.[82][83][84][85][86][87][88][10] Israel is not a party to the NPT. Israel engages in strategic ambiguity, saying it would not be the first country to "introduce" nuclear weapons into the region, but refusing to otherwise confirm or deny a nuclear weapons program or arsenal. This policy of "nuclear opacity" has been interpreted as an attempt to get the benefits of deterrence with a minimal political cos

@Lucienne d'Anwyl would you headpat Negev-Tan?

presumed to have nukes only one listed is Isreal

<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

At least the Pakis are ballsy enough to say they have nukes

>south africa

why did i see that and immediately think nuclear capable countries

like i looked at only the map and i knew

south africans are smart enough to build nukes?

>Kazakhastan

>Ukraine

lolwut

green is used to have

Ah.

light blue and red actually have them

is dark blue us nukes based there

Since when did Kazakhstan have nukes?

dark blue is where we "put" them

@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck ussr based them there

probs

Ah.

For a moment I thought that they weren't a complete Post-USSR shithole

Just US, UK, China, Russia, and France, India, Pakistan, kinda North Korea, and probably Isreal

also iran

probably

no

Goodnyaght everynyan! The only thing I have for sale is regret

yes

Not Iran Yet

no

if north korea has nukes

but we know

why wouldnt iran

The USSR wasn't that bad under Stalin tbh

"Kinda" North Korea?

What?

because you need certain enrichment

otherwise it literally won't work

North kore is ok, I'd live there

and they can get that stuff

from like

name a place

and we can seismically test if they tested a nuke

they could just buy missiles from pakistan

i dunno why you think you can lol

so even if they built them they might not work

maybe seismic test to find a silo

not to find a nuke itself

look it up

they can measure the vibration of a nuclear blast

ye

if they tested it

if they didnt then youd never know

also i think we'd keep tabs on nukes sold using spies

but you need to test to make them work if you built them

If they didn't test it, then they wouldn't know if it will work when they want to deploy the weapon..

but it's like a high chance of not working

Or get relevant information...

that's what I meant by kinda

like needing rocket tests cause 99.9% of the time something goes wrong

Which is useful from a test

imagine

iran launches nukes at the US

build and test a functioning missile and get away with it

they don't detonate

uh oh

ruh roh

List of countries that no longer exist:

Do they even have ICBMs capable of reaching the USA?

+ Iran

Tbh, the US air defense system is tougher than we might think

not that I know of

no

they have like a 90% success rate at best

you can never know if a nuke will work when you fire it

so if you shoot 1000 nukes

https://iranprimer.usip.org/resource/irans-ballistic-missile-program

uh oh

you cant test a nuke

inasmuch as you can fire one

but they obviously arent reusable

>They don't even have a long-range delivery platform

Iran's ballistics are a tad outdated when compared to china's and russia's

test the design

you dont need a long range delivery platform

Breaking news: Tesla makes reusable nuke

even atom bombs are deployable via basic bombers

Thank you Elon, very cool

you can also make smaller dirty bombs and have spies deliver them

and the only country iran is likely to nuke is israel

Airspaces are hard to fuckin infiltrate now

We really forget the countries around Iran and North korea fucking hate them

they dont need an icbm to hit israel

Which requires miniaturization

Of weapons they don't have?

ICBMs are more efficient in terms of delivering payload to its target

Or large amounts of enriched uranium, which they don't have?

a dirty bomb is a completely different weapon than a nuke

by the way

they won't let make nukes or get away with trying to use them

they dont use uranium either iirc

Who wants to hit Israel with a nuke? Destroy your holy land ?

Which still required nuclear material

>Which they couldn't get

>Under the nuclear deal

which isnt difficult to get

rlatively speaking

Which IS difficult to get.

Half the middle east fucking hates Iran

if you say so

considering they could buy it from many parties

>Why haven't we seen large scale deployment of dirty weapons?

the us has no control over

<:thonking:353271399013416962>

iran hasnt gone to war with anyone have they

If they're "relatively easy to get"

Even if iran manages to smuggle radioactive material to use, it's not like they have the actual balls to fucking blow shit up with it

they had a brief thing with iraq

Terrorist organisations?

The countries with oil want to sell their oil so they "behave"

ISIS would have loved some.

Palestine would love some.

@Weez terrorist organizations dont have the resources of whole nations lol

Palestine is a nation.

they dont have the diplomatic connections either

palestine isnt a real nation lol

No it isn't

not only are they tiny

Kek

they are just a bunch of penned up animals

You don't just fly over to North Korea and say "Can I have some nuclear material"

not until they accept a deal

living at the sufferance of the israelis

You use a train

Free p*lestine

They don't have those

<:BIGBRAIN:501101491428392991>

pretty sure iran has trains

Oh, NK has the longest railway transit in the world

The NORKS have the deepest subway in the world *

They have it, but they don't have funds to use it

Though it was Russia

It ends at nk

NORKS WAAAGH!

Norks are weird

The fact that they managed to barely still have shit shows how great their smugglers are

russia had subways made into bomb shelters

didnt they

Pretty much yeah

It was a happy accident

That they could be used as such

Subways almost always double as defensive structures in times of war

Big space, underground, reinforced, made of concrete

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

watch a documentary on it when History channel was history

>concrete

>reinforced with

🤔

concrete is kinda a weak ass material dde

its usually reinforced with steel rebar

Reinforced with steel rather

in buildings its reinforced with steel i beams

Concrete ain't no joke homeboy

its hard

and brittle

and breaks easily

it also erodes pretty easily

It doesn't?

Not exactly

Concrete takes decades to fully set let alone break down

Generally when concrete erodes it's BECAUSE of the reinforcements added into it

IE, the steel which is put in for strength

back in my day

Can become the weakness of it.

N word

N'WAH!

the steel breaking down how lol

rust?

which forms from congtact with the air?

Also Roman concrete isnt (usually) stronger than Our Concrete

which implies that there have to be ways for air on the outside to reach the steel inside?

If concrete is that brittle and crackable, modern engineers wouldn't have used them as the basis of structures for long term concerns

Romans used it differently

Concrete is really susceptible to gun fire, however there are many mixtures, even since Roman times we’ve been putting crap in our concrete

Most or the crumbling concrete today arent from buildings

modern engineers use a lot of things for a lot of things

They are from bridges and other infrastructure

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLF18H9JGHs

Romans didnt build overhead highways

asphalt isnt a very long lasting material

but its used to pave most roads

ooo rebar

The rust forms on the rebar

Which expands

made cheap get cheap results then ask about repairs later