Discord ID: 598761542200197120
Pakistan isnt in the middle east though
neither is Bangladesh, Indonesia
Central africa and Somalia
Yea, because those innocent men, women and children deserve to be glassed including the ones who aren't even Muslim. K
> Calling pakistanies asian
They aren't all going to die
They are going to become civilised
Mhm, so "glassing" doesn't mean turning the sand to glass with nuclear radiation heat, huh?
minna, suiyobi desu
"It just mean civilized you guys, I swear"
I like making you squirm lol
i'm with samaritan, let them glass the middle east
Can't wait to have more "refugees" come to Europe
As a result.
i don't like israel i just hate palestine more tbh
super secret plan:
send the refugees to israel
They can stop in turkey or one of the other 7 countries they pass through
isreal has border control
>Israel who's bombing Syria
we can learn some things
>Sending migrants to Europe
America, France and Uk who are also bombing Syria
let israel bomb the middle east then send the refugees into israel
perfect plan guys
Threaten to cut ALL funding to them if they don't take all the refugees in
Maybe they can stop supporting Terrorist attacks <:hyperthink:462282519883284480>
i disavow my own joke sbtw
If there are refugees you aren't bombing them hard enough
When you realize it's payback against Germany and Britain
I'd make dresden look like a fucking joke
I'm gonna make Hiroshima look like a fucking joke <:hypersmugon:544638648721604608>
I'm gonna make Nagasaki look like a fucking child's game <:hypersmugon:544638648721604608>
If only America and Russia tested their nukes on the real range during the cold war
What's wrong with Isreal
there was legit a retard in this server who said Israel didn't have nuke capabilities
and hasn't ever
tbh negev chan is cute
even though the CIA has said they've had nuke capabilities since the 1960s
Israel is widely believed to have been the sixth country in the world to develop nuclear weapons, but has not acknowledged its nuclear forces. It had "rudimentary, but deliverable," nuclear weapons available as early as 1966. Israel is not a party to the NPT. Israel engages in strategic ambiguity, saying it would not be the first country to "introduce" nuclear weapons into the region, but refusing to otherwise confirm or deny a nuclear weapons program or arsenal. This policy of "nuclear opacity" has been interpreted as an attempt to get the benefits of deterrence with a minimal political cos
presumed to have nukes only one listed is Isreal
At least the Pakis are ballsy enough to say they have nukes
why did i see that and immediately think nuclear capable countries
like i looked at only the map and i knew
south africans are smart enough to build nukes?
green is used to have
light blue and red actually have them
is dark blue us nukes based there
Since when did Kazakhstan have nukes?
dark blue is where we "put" them
For a moment I thought that they weren't a complete Post-USSR shithole
Just US, UK, China, Russia, and France, India, Pakistan, kinda North Korea, and probably Isreal
Goodnyaght everynyan! The only thing I have for sale is regret
Not Iran Yet
if north korea has nukes
but we know
why wouldnt iran
The USSR wasn't that bad under Stalin tbh
"Kinda" North Korea?
because you need certain enrichment
otherwise it literally won't work
North kore is ok, I'd live there
and they can get that stuff
name a place
and we can seismically test if they tested a nuke
they could just buy missiles from pakistan
i dunno why you think you can lol
so even if they built them they might not work
maybe seismic test to find a silo
not to find a nuke itself
look it up
they can measure the vibration of a nuclear blast
if they tested it
if they didnt then youd never know
also i think we'd keep tabs on nukes sold using spies
but you need to test to make them work if you built them
If they didn't test it, then they wouldn't know if it will work when they want to deploy the weapon..
but it's like a high chance of not working
Or get relevant information...
that's what I meant by kinda
like needing rocket tests cause 99.9% of the time something goes wrong
Which is useful from a test
iran launches nukes at the US
build and test a functioning missile and get away with it
they don't detonate
List of countries that no longer exist:
Do they even have ICBMs capable of reaching the USA?
Tbh, the US air defense system is tougher than we might think
not that I know of
they have like a 90% success rate at best
you can never know if a nuke will work when you fire it
so if you shoot 1000 nukes
you cant test a nuke
inasmuch as you can fire one
but they obviously arent reusable
>They don't even have a long-range delivery platform
Iran's ballistics are a tad outdated when compared to china's and russia's
test the design
you dont need a long range delivery platform
Breaking news: Tesla makes reusable nuke
even atom bombs are deployable via basic bombers
Thank you Elon, very cool
you can also make smaller dirty bombs and have spies deliver them
and the only country iran is likely to nuke is israel
Airspaces are hard to fuckin infiltrate now
We really forget the countries around Iran and North korea fucking hate them
they dont need an icbm to hit israel
Which requires miniaturization
Of weapons they don't have?
ICBMs are more efficient in terms of delivering payload to its target
Or large amounts of enriched uranium, which they don't have?
a dirty bomb is a completely different weapon than a nuke
by the way
they won't let make nukes or get away with trying to use them
they dont use uranium either iirc
Who wants to hit Israel with a nuke? Destroy your holy land ?
Which still required nuclear material
>Which they couldn't get
>Under the nuclear deal
which isnt difficult to get
Which IS difficult to get.
Half the middle east fucking hates Iran
if you say so
considering they could buy it from many parties
>Why haven't we seen large scale deployment of dirty weapons?
the us has no control over
iran hasnt gone to war with anyone have they
If they're "relatively easy to get"
Even if iran manages to smuggle radioactive material to use, it's not like they have the actual balls to fucking blow shit up with it
they had a brief thing with iraq
The countries with oil want to sell their oil so they "behave"
ISIS would have loved some.
Palestine would love some.
@Weez terrorist organizations dont have the resources of whole nations lol
Palestine is a nation.
they dont have the diplomatic connections either
palestine isnt a real nation lol
No it isn't
not only are they tiny
they are just a bunch of penned up animals
You don't just fly over to North Korea and say "Can I have some nuclear material"
not until they accept a deal
living at the sufferance of the israelis
You use a train
They don't have those
pretty sure iran has trains
Oh, NK has the longest railway transit in the world
The NORKS have the deepest subway in the world *
They have it, but they don't have funds to use it
Though it was Russia
It ends at nk
Norks are weird
The fact that they managed to barely still have shit shows how great their smugglers are
russia had subways made into bomb shelters
Pretty much yeah
It was a happy accident
That they could be used as such
Subways almost always double as defensive structures in times of war
Big space, underground, reinforced, made of concrete
watch a documentary on it when History channel was history
concrete is kinda a weak ass material dde
its usually reinforced with steel rebar
Reinforced with steel rather
in buildings its reinforced with steel i beams
Concrete ain't no joke homeboy
and breaks easily
it also erodes pretty easily
Concrete takes decades to fully set let alone break down
Generally when concrete erodes it's BECAUSE of the reinforcements added into it
IE, the steel which is put in for strength
back in my day
Can become the weakness of it.
the steel breaking down how lol
which forms from congtact with the air?
Also Roman concrete isnt (usually) stronger than Our Concrete
which implies that there have to be ways for air on the outside to reach the steel inside?
If concrete is that brittle and crackable, modern engineers wouldn't have used them as the basis of structures for long term concerns
Romans used it differently
Concrete is really susceptible to gun fire, however there are many mixtures, even since Roman times we’ve been putting crap in our concrete
Most or the crumbling concrete today arent from buildings
modern engineers use a lot of things for a lot of things
They are from bridges and other infrastructure
Romans didnt build overhead highways
asphalt isnt a very long lasting material
but its used to pave most roads
The rust forms on the rebar
made cheap get cheap results then ask about repairs later