palaestra_debates
Discord ID: 633967335614447636
26,215 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 29/105
| Next
Kek
The only thing I hate more than Antifa are Globalists
Ye boi
Same
Antifa is part of globalism, not separate.
If you hate globalists more than Antifa, that means you think Antifa (which is part of globalism) is improvement over the rest, and with that assumption, you would actually support Antifa if they were nationalistic (like NazBol).
It's funny how time after time people convert to social conservativism and reject the Red Pill.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=faeT4fIFAcg
Or, how housewifery is just another form of feminism.
how is being a housewife a form of feminism?
Let Karen explain, maybe. Why do you think I linked it.
>42 min
no thx sorry
You do you.
if it's the whole "women become dependent and have all their needs met by men" bit, then it's dead-wrong
Just check the video.
house-wife is the single most stable way to have a family
I am not watching a 42 minute vid by some woman who looks like a man
no1 is saying that you *have to* be a housewife
just that, in the vast majority of cases, that is the best course of action
The video argues why it isn't.
when it's 42 minutes long
Because female nature will not allow housewife to be happy with that.
you start the wonder if the person actually has a point, or if they are just making rambling mental gymnastics
I see you've never listened through Karen's Red Pill collection.
no
It's pretty apparent since you dismiss it with "lololo tomboy old woman".
that, and being 42 min long
if you can't shorten it past that, you dont have a concise point
You can spray the room and walls full of shit with a hose in one minutes but it takes whole day to clean that shit up.
Red Pill is always long and painful. Blue Pill is the easy way.
ah, so the entirety of society has been completely wrong
is your argument
hmm
I feel like I've heard this before somewhere...
Nice strawman.
nope
accurate analogy
analogies are not strawmans
your own analogy says the entire room has been sprayed with shit
which directly implies that the entire system is completely broken
**ENTIRETY** of society
**COMPLETELY** wrong
Tell me how that is *not* a strawman.
I just did
๐
So I've rejected **EVERYTHING** that **EVERYONE** in society believes in?
nope
try giving my position just a tiny bit more charitability, and you might see the point I made
So not just is housewifery agreed by **EVERYONE** but housewifery is **EVERYTHING** everyone believes and no-one believe in anything else?
I will not be charitable. You strawmanned.
that is *clearly* what I am saying
absolutely
And that's a strawman.
*sarcasm flies over head*
MGTOWs are gay
feminists are gay
butch lesbians are gay
traps are gay
commies are gay
*"Trololo. I was only pretending to be retarded. Joke's on you."*
groypers are gay
OK BOOMER
okay groper
for a system that is supposedly broken and backwards (meaning housewifery), it seems to have been remarkably stable over the entirety of human history
really makes you ๐ค
btw, if you can't tldr your general argument, that almost exclusively means you dont have a concise point
concise points arent required for correctness, only convenience of the lazy or lacking of time
Social cohesion is great as long as there's only one race. Once you have different races in the same society, people stop caring about each other.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xz42BrlkBD8
Multiracial America vs. Chinese ethnostate:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SaKDxeBQqQ
People simply care more about their own race.
the chinese are very herd-like it seems
i imagine that
if you have a people that support an ethnostate
its like they all share the herd mentality
whereas in a country that DOESNT, they would be more individualistic about it, and more likely to stand up out of the herd to make a decision
well also
if its a chinese doing something to another chinese, other chinese would think 'its probably fine, i trust my people to not do such things'
whereas in other places, its like 'yo that nigga black as fuck trying to start some shit, ima step in'
I have to disagree, we see in multicultural societies that you still have a herd mentality such as the progressives as a good example.
the progressives are marxists
they literally think of the world as herds
herds of black, white, men, women
they have more in common with chinese sensibilities
But blacks also have a herd mentality in America
yes because they are taught that the system is racist and to not trust white people
on a large scale
They have a distinct culture even after 500 years and if you try to stand out youโre called โwhiteโ
they are taught to be herd-like
Well even back in the 60โs they acted in their collective interests
Before they were taught presumably
if you want a real example, look at a lower-middle class white dude from the suburbs
I think this kind of behavior just comes out
your examples dont work because youre choosing groups that have the same mentality specifically
afterall, youre supporting a white ethnostate
so use regular, non-progressive/middle class white people
not the progressives who have the mindset already, or blacks that also get the mindset too
the progressives are like 20% of the population, probably less
weak sauce
Iโm picking groups that have the same mentality? Then what makes something a group then? If they donโt have something in common? Plus I live in a middle class area full of whites and they share a lot in common. They live in the same area, share hobbies, jokes, understand common situations that have happened in the town etc
All religious to a extent
They have a shared culture, religion, attitude, behavior and preferences
Theyโre individuals sure, they might disagree politically or religiously
But those are outlers to the general group
Even sargons โliberalistsโ are a group that share a political doctrine
Groups are made by what people have in common
Thatโs why a ethnic nationalist such as myself, **Donโt** want multiple groups since theyโll fight each other over their interests and beliefs
The disagreement between me and a civic/state nationalist is that I think race is real, and a valid prediction of group behavior
And civic nats donโt
*"if its a chinese doing something to another chinese, other chinese would think 'its probably fine, i trust my people to not do such things'"*
If you watched (or listened) through the first video, you'd know that is only half the case. They are a herd... but they don't choose to not intervene because it's a high-trust ethnostate. It's the polar opposite: China is a low-trust society where streets are **FULL** of pickpocketers and scammers.
so like russia and dash cams
If you were to intervene with a "kidnapping" you'd more likely fall for a scammer, to be lead in a back alley and mugged for money.
They have lots of bars for example, that don't have customers in the traditional sense, but which have extremely high prices for stuff like one cup of tea. They work with street scammers who offer tourists help to find good restaurants out of friendliness.
Then once you are in, they get offered seating and apperitizers, not knowing the price (because they cannot read Chinese). And come thousands of dollars short for the snacks. And the police know these, and they bribe the police. And if they are forced to close, they open up again in a few days.
This is China.
This is a low-trust society.
isnt it an odd situation that they have this 'dont trust other people' but they also have trust/dependency on the government?
strange to figure out
I don't know if they trust the govt. It's that they must be afraid of it.
Because every Chink knows they need to bribe the police and other officials. They don't live in a bubble.
And by Chink, I mean mainlanders. Taiwan and Hong-Kong are different, the former being true Chinese and the latter being a British colony.
Hong-Kong belongs to Taiwan. Taiwan number one.
Brits made the deal of renting Hong-Kong with legitimate govt of China, currently in exile in Taiwan. There's no question to whom it should be returned to, and it's not the mainland.
I think showing sympathy toward Taiwan is more... **WAY MORE** important than showing sympathy toward Hong Kong. Hong Kong was lost when British recognized mainland China as the only true China, and gave HK back to then (rather than Taiwan). There's no contesting it **AFTER THE FACT**. It's now an internal dispute, and if we don't bother with China genociding Yugurs and Falun Gong and organ-harvesting them, there's no reason to care about HK... even if they decided to disembovel all HK citizens while still alive.
Taiwan is not a lost cause, because countries can still reverse the recognition of communist China and start recognizing Taiwan instead. That is reversible. Globalists would say it's suicidal, but what has China offered Europe and USA anyway? Nothing, except exporting jobs to China, and buying the stuff produced in China, hurting Europe and USA and benefiting China.
**Fucking recognize Taiwan.**
I don't care about "it's a suicide" because I want a trade war with China. Otherwise China will be the world hegemon, controlling everyone. And only China benefits that. We may get cheap electronics (with spyware) from China, but the price we pay for this economic self-destruction of not having our own industry will be unsufferable: the unemployment, damage to environment, political cucking... the list never ends.
<:hypersmugon:544638648721604608>
BASED
?
He now works with people who deem it anti semitic to question this aid
It'll be great to bring this up in future Q/A
"On August 6, 2015, you tweeted this, and I quote 'the tweet here'. Why do you now deem it antisemitic to question this aid and why do Congressmen threaten to dox others if asked such question?"
LMAO
Dude Iโve never heard a angry and confused chink before
Well, just tell them about Taiwan.
I shop at Ebay (I'm a hypocrite) but if I ever have to contest a shipment not matching description, I remember to add: "Taiwan number one." at he claim to Ebay (to which the seller will also receive a copy).
Just to piss off the fraudsters.
I get my money back either way (because Ebay always sides with the customer) and the commie faggot gets epic butthurt.
@snake They even sperg out at girls doing the same shit: https://youtu.be/Pin1__rpcqs?t=40
**CAO NI MA!!!**
(Engl: fuck yo mama)
Important phrases you need to know.
LMFAO the first comment
โHow to learn Chinese cussing
1: find Chinese man
2: say Taiwan number one
3: listenโ
CAO NI MA is the Chink equivalent to CYKA BLYAT.
Actually, let me correct that: ะกะฃะะ ะะะฏะะฌ is apparently "Whore Bitch". It was ะะฑ ัะฒะพั ะผะฐัั (yob tvoyu mat) that was "fuck your mother". It's the curse they say whenever they have a car accident in those dashcam videos.
...and I just **LOVE** those car crash compilations. Russians are one fucked up people.
russians are like if britain was colder
**TOMORROW IS NOV 11TH!**
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41-dLH5YqeU
It's a dead hope to wish Sargoy to address the fact of what used to be Rhodesia on 11th.
Even with the looming fate over South Africa ... and the fate of HK after being released from British colonialism.
>go other places make them greater than before
>leave them and they get fucked
>stay in our own places and make them greater than before
>say lolXD marxism pls and get fucked
Damn their already taking Nick down
Soon enough heโll end up like Alex Jones at this rate
The silver lining is that Styx is sticking to his guns against Tech censorship
Lolberts for you
Reminder that Vaush endorses Child Pornography
Vaush is not lolbert
Wait
Heโs debating Vaush?
Wait wtf
Yeah thatโs definitely proof vaush a spiteful mutant
Yeah thatโs definitely proof heโs dysgenic
@Monstrous Moonshine Lol. Self-described hypocrite. I really should trust him (not).
It's been years since I've watched any of his videos but he's quite a sophist. Intelligent, but dishonest sleazy fuck.
It's funny how "after doing more digging I found a stream vaush did where he says he believes drawn child pron should be 100% legal and that he would defend any depiction of cp/lolicon/shota." yet people also accuse Vaush of approving CP that **directly** hurts children.
Even real CP doesn't **directly** hurt anyone, only indirectly (i.e production rather than watching). And lolicon/shota doesn't even do that indirect shit and the "best" argument against it assumption of a slippery slope, against evidence that non-CP porn **reduces** rape.
...but I don't know, the clip sounds bad when taken out of context (just like "depends on the child"). Maybe it's just as bad or worse in context as it sounds out of it. I need to check the stream. It's just such a frustrating stream as they're both leftist and spout the intersectionality insanity constantly (while they were supposed to have Vegan actually challenge that shit).
I would **ASSUME** it's this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-qg521jrGw
Yeah. Checked the context, there was nothing that diminishes Vaush being a piece of shit there. Despite the comment mentioning "he believes drawn child pron should be 100% legal" and "cp/lolicon/shota", Vaush does in that debate with Vegan Gains talk only about decriminalization of real CP with real children... and not just possession but buying it with money and supporting the rape itself monetarily.
This is Peak Degeneracy, Vaush.
I guess as a communist, he doesn't understand *the markets* and how they work, and how by paying for CP you cause more of it.
Later he goes on explaining how manufacturing T-shirts in India makes India poorer rather than richer, that toiling land in subsistence farming would save them from exploitation. And his argument for decriminalization of real CP is because he doesn't want to criminalize purchasing anything that causes damage to produce because vegans a hypocritical on focusing only on animal suffering while ignoring cars and animal suffering from oil spills, etc. And because he's consistent and cannot ban purchase off **EVERYTHING** you cannot ban **ANYTHING** incl. child porn.
I simply cannot get the logic behind paying for something to be done is OK, doing it yourself is bad. And Vaush is not alone with that, the entire culture of Hindus are aboard that insanity: they cannot mistreat white cows or cows in general. Or they cannot kill animals in general... **so they pay for the Muslim minority to butcher all the animals, cut their meat and make clothes out of their skin**.... and they don't see *anything* wrong with it.
Hindus are based and redpilled
> Why did Virginia flip blue?
>
> Why is Texas purple?
>
> Demographics. Immigration.
>
> This is the suicidal gift the GOP establishment keeps giving to America.
>
> How did 60 million people who don't speak English end up living in the USA?
>
> Our immigration "system" is out of control.
How did mohamed become the #1 popular name for a new born?
Everytime I fret too much about Neocons or Classical Liberals, I see the replies to such tweets by leftists to compare the levels and that makes me want to go full Moon on them
Never forget who these grifters are
2015: Idiots like Trump with insane and hateful rhetoric
2019: I decide who true Trump supporters are
Bruh
Ever have it where you think someone is kinda bad, but then more info just keeps piling on?
We have more ammo for the upcoming Q/As
โHow can you determine whoโs a โreal trump supporterโ or a โreal conservativeโ when you took the same position as the left in being against Donald Trump?โ
Kinda bad because they can just say โI changed my mind lolโ
But itโs still important that they didnโt support him because 2015 is when the meme war was going on
Also what changed their minds about trump? He hasnโt changed
โHow can you determine whoโs a โreal trump supporterโ or a โreal conservativeโ when you took the same position as the left in being against Donald Trump. What made you change your mind โI do it for the moneyโ Ben?โ
Maybe itโs a little aggressive
โDonโt you see the parallels between the groypers of today and the memers back in 2015? Why in every instance of this situation popping up are you against the grass roots movement?โ
It's interesting how they bring up quotes of Nick from 2016 about race mixing on Stanford Uni in a Jewish billionaire funded platform to discredit him
Yet they weasel out their way through their own previous tweets
By simply saying they changed their minds
Oh that gives more material
โHow come you smear Nick Fuentes for quotes back in 2016, yet when we ask you about old quotes, you โchanged your mindโ?โ
Tons of hard questions for their behavior
Especially that question about Palestines ethnic cleansing that Shapiru tweeted about
Has nick changed his mind on Israel?
Nick hasnโt, though heโs opinion on Israel isnโt actually as crazy as he memes it to be
@Monstrous Moonshine Yeah, Hindus in the US tend to be really fucking redpilled IIRC
oh god, and then Hindutva
<:ahegao:462286952335671296>
He doesnโt want anything to do with Israel, just break away from them mostly
Remember heโs a America First nationalist
oy vey why won't somebody think of the innocent pakis
how can Hindu Nationalism be allowed <:FuzzyPeach:583773935385182231>
@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck everyone makes fun of Rutgers at NJIT lol
Rutgers has quite a few Lefties IIRC
at least in Philly
Either you go to Rutgers Newark right across the street from us, in which case you're a New Brunswick or NJIT reject
but maybe that's just because of Philly
Or you go to New Brunswick
In which case you just go to a party school
Rutgers isnt in Philly, what?
https://youtu.be/1BJqH-kgb1I
@Monstrous Moonshine you know how conservative inc likes to dig up old quotes to smear the groypers? Turns out it backfired. Hard.
wait
lmao
I'm thinking of Drexel, I think?
wait nvm
I'm thinking of Rutgers New Brunswick IIRC
so I was right that gropers wish to force their positions down other people
they are just mad the left is winning the culture war through tyranny and wish they were winning the tyranny
@Monstrous Moonshine Based on their logic that it's OK to make others do what is immoral for you to do?
If you have that opinion, isn't it perfectly OK to purchase child porn? You aren't raping the child after all. Based Red Pilled?
It's funny how Groypers complain about today's Republicans being too tolerant of gays, too irreligious, etc.
...yet dig up messages from Conservatives Inc. where they've lambasted Trump for being divorced many times. I mean, if you are True Conservativeโข you should be anti-Trump like Charlie Kirk used to be.
Now he's pro-Trump because he's a partisan. Why is "was this Republican's first pick in 2016 primaries Trump or someone else" a gotcha question of whether someone is a True Conservativeโข ?
Especially **considering Trump was OK with gay marriage before Obama was**. Is Trump in any way the True Conservativismโข that Groypers want?
The most irreligious president for several decades.
Cannot even quote any Bible verse. Does not have a favorite verse. Probably don't know of the Ten Commandments.
And suddenly being anti-Trump (especially when he was running against more religious nutjobs in primaries) is a sign of not being conservative enough.
I simply cannot understand they Groypers claiming that Republicans have been hijacked while defending Trump. **THE ONE WHO HIJACKED REPUBLICANS WAS TRUMP FOR FUCKS SAKE!** He's the one being pro-gay and doesn't care about Jesus Jesus and shit. He's the one reforming the Republicans... or cucking the party to libertarians and liberals, depending on whether you think it's good or bad to drop the dead wedge issues and focus on economy.
groypers are big ๐ ฑomo
26,215 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 29/105
| Next