palaestra_debates
Discord ID: 633967335614447636
26,215 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 38/263
| Next
The first part is about something else
Why is Cheddar Man stuff related to the topic?
*2D
It's such a out-of-topic video link.
ye ok fine it was 2d
It's not, he is just responding to a leftist
And combined both of them in one video
<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
Watch from 8:00
still better then 1 d
You do have a....
POINT
๐ช
1D is a line... 0D is a point (or lack of it).
thanks whiic ๐ค
<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
@Monstrous Moonshine dude that hr long talk with tucker is pretty good
I don't thinkl Fuentes is a good faith actor. And neither is Alex Jones.
Fuentes did not want picture taken of him next to Kirk because he wants a memento, because he likes the guy. He just wants to give fodder to the left so Kirk can be removed for being in the same picture as him. That said, now the rightwing will destroy Kirk instead. There was no win condition, and there is no win condition for the right in general, because rightwing wants to self-destruct because Clown World. Fuentes as embraced it, he wants destruction. He's YangGang and all that shit.
Fuentes wants the left to win in order to further societal collapse.
Charlie is pretty cuck on Isreal. The irony is that his claim of rejecting the idea of dual loyalty might **actually be true**.
He probably has loyalty only to Israel.
>America is just a placeholder for ideas, if we had those ideas on an island and the Grand Canyon and native demographics disappeared, it would be still be America
>Israel is an exception because there is a holy connection to the land
How else should I interpret USA is *only* a placeholder for ideas.
He literally said that not just the demographics, but the land itself doesn't matter
While saying Israel is an exception
Hey, did you get the time stamp to Kirk saying he supports "The Gay Agenda"?
Don't cuck on me.
I already gave it to you
Scroll up
It's been like 5 hours of backlog. Where in there is the timestamp? You posted the video without timestamp.
No, not 5 hours. It was 3 hours ago.
7PM, not 17... my mistake.
Ok, 43:04 (I don't know why you posted it in DM)
Nope, he didn't say explicitly "The Gay Agenda".
That was your original claim. And it was a false claim.
All he said that if gays want to get married, the can, law of the land, whatever and conservatives need to focus on defending religious liberty (instead of imposing religious values on the state and it's laws).
You're just full of shit, Ford.
Nope watch properly
He explicitly says that we need to "move on to bigger battles"
Which underlies the acceptance that there was a battle and that he is cucking on it
Yeah. He meant that SCOTUS has rules gay marriage constitutional, as in **THE STATE** must treat it similarly as hetero marriages.
I already clarified my opposition to him, which is his subversion of Conservatism with libertine ideas
That is the battle conservatives used to fight.
The fight that **should** continue is fight against the idea that churches need to partake in gay stuff.
This is why he has to make up terms like "Conservatarian". It is standard semiotic subversion, akin to what the left does with gendered bathrooms
The fight for **THE STATE** to discriminate and act as an extension to the church (against what 1st A says what govt cannot do) is a lost battle.
Again, you are full of shit, Ford.
Read my comment properly you retard. He isn't morally opposed to it either, and disavows true Conservatives who call him out for that.
He literally paraded a black gay person as the pinnacle of Conservatism in the Ohio event
From this onward? https://youtu.be/_9WtM10JxtI?t=2584
It's like the last couple of seconds of the entire video.
Don't derail.
I called you out, shit.
5:45
That's different timestamp retard.
Different video.
Sure, you can keep calling out like a deluded idiot
The retard who cried "Nazi"
Where does Kirk say conservatives cannot be anti-gay marriage in personal opinion?
But this is what I mean when I say he supports the Gay Agenda
Respecting SCOTUS is Gay Agenda?
Respecting 1st A is Gay Agenda?
Flaunting fags as Conservative is Anti Conservatism
That plus that other amendment about equality under the law between demographics. I don't remember the number.
It isn't a question about legality, but morality
@Monstrous Moonshine Well, if you go that far, what states **REPUBLICANS** are conservative?
Conservative is not part of word "Republican".
Which he was called out on for cucking
Why should libertarians be purged from Republican party?
I'm not sure if this is particularly relevant but to my knowledge Christians have moved out of the battle for legislation, they don't consider the law to have a place in their vision of morality anymore
Liberty is cucking. Yeah, right.
I didn't say they should
But that isn't Conservative either
I'm against semiotic subversion of Charlie Kike
"Conservatarian"
Very few "conservative" is a reactionary who wants to go back to 1790.
Gay rights are only really opposed by religious people or some weird fascists, not by any conservatives outside of those groups
Dude, you subvert as well, when you call Japan, Iceland and Poland "ethnostates".
Everyone subverts and you do it way more.
On a moral level it is opposed by quite a lot of people
Even though they might not want the state to ban them
But not by atheists, for example
It takes a religious approach to be against gay rights
And not many atheists are Conservative either
There are Traditionalist perspective for hetronormativity as well
well i think him calling those places ethnostates is a misnomer
because they dont ONLY allow japanese people
Conservatives are not an inherent part of Christianity, that's the other thing
I'm personally an agnostic
its just no one cares if they maintain their demographic majority using immigration policy
You can be Christian, without being conservative, and you can be atheist, while also being conservative
But still Traditionalist
26,215 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 38/263
| Next