tholos_news
Discord ID: 633967610706526210
16,919 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 37/170
| Next
Baiting to do what?
be dismissive and snarky
I had someone fuck up haplo group map with Norway and claimed there werenโt ethnically homogeneous because he confused haplo group maps with ethnic maps
Spencer was calm and composed, unlike Sargon
There was no match
keep tellin urself that
๐
Watch it again
I did
twice
I've watched it just now
Spencer was snarky but Sargon did not have his shit together dude
yup
Sargon was exceptionally cranky
because
as I said
Spencer succeeded in baiting him
Not even that
that was pretty much it
Sargon was out of the gate
On straws
I dont understand that metaphor
From the beginning he was mad
Sargon was out of his depth on basic facts like Persians being genetically related to Europeans
untrue
at the start he was calm
then Spencer said retarded shit
blatantly and bold-faced
and Sargon took shock to it
At which point did Spencer say retarded shit for the first time?
Ok so Sargon canโt handle shit talk from the alt right?
on that instance?
he failed
Fair enough but I saw the debate, he was pissed from the start, idk if it was something BEFORE the stream or not
But he just, honestly shouldnโt have been there
Whoโs python?
eh nvm
Sargon should have taken a day off
Chilled out a bit
Sargon should've taken a short break
talked with Styx
and then went back in
They did take a break
All three of them
`talked with Styx`
I think Styx knew Sargon was on edge
but yeah, everything Spencer advocated for came out of a fiction novel
"Warrior Scholar caste!"
"We'll pay them to leave!"
That was a Nietzsche idea right? @Monstrous Moonshine
The warrior scholar caste
Yeah
lolwat
Sargon was harping about individualism from the beginning
*now* that's interesting
And Spencer asked him whether he was ancap or not
Nietzsche was huge into hierarchy
plz
Which Sargon evaded
reference me
And caste systems, a lot like evola in that since
Nietzsche advocating for this
I am interested
also
recall
Nietzche reneged on like half of his views later in life
Oh donโt know if he went back on it
But itโs definitely something he would have said
...
so you pulled that 1 out of ur ass
good to know
Iโm sorry I canโt go to my book and look through the pages
you dont need to
Reading it was a pain in the ass, if youโre so interested read it yourself
you just need to give a general outline for his case for it
sounds like you're BSing to me, vr0
I donโt care what it sounds like to you
ah,
Iโm not trying to change your mind on anything
the usual,
dont care after losing, bit
very common among the intellectually dishonest
Lmao
๐ค
Alright whatever, Iโm out of here
bye!!!
๐
rofl
@Monstrous Moonshine Degeneracy can't be weeded out with emotional arguments. You're only fueling the fire, which has the opposite effect after all is ashes and must be rebuilt.
We can look at degeneracy from a objective standpoint in evolution if you want, or a political/social one. Take your pick in the conversation
Iโm willing to have a conversation about it
Degeneracy is not an objective matter, it's a matter of opinion, so there's no objective angle in the first place
Well, I donโt know if I would go that far
Because letโs take the worst example to illustrate this
Bug chasers right?
The ones who have a sexual fetish for catching STDโs
Thatโs obviously something we can classify as โdegenerateโ although Iโll admit I donโt really have a definition or a picture/frame to put it in
Just a vague idea
16,919 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 37/170
| Next