bowlnut_gallery
Discord ID: 313367111546175490
39,554 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 71/396
| Next
No goy don't you get it
by outlawing antisemitism he's actually against the jews!
Galaxy brain smoloko hot take
Nazis are actually Mossad agents, so imprisoning nazis for jews is actually 1488D chess and redpilled.
Russian insider is puttin out good work with their new editor regardless
That jew taboo article really lays it all out
Fuck Jew-tin ๐ฟ
It was too woke for Russia.
๐ญ๐ท ๐ช ๐ท๐บ
Jew-tin must BTFO!
The Tsar must return!
NAZBOL GANG
DUGIN WILL REIGN SUPREME
That's not all of them
Goddamn.
Well the major ones.
There's a ton.
There's one other major one that lives in San Fransico
Maria has the blessing of some Russian patriarch so I guess she's on the top of the list.
You know, it's pretty funny, you only ever see two nationalities fetishizing the Tsar - Russians and burgers. Really, in Discord or Facebook, you only ever see them two having a hardon for the tsarist monarchy, rest of the world and euros are ambivalent or hostile.
Chaimbach named his kid after the last Tsar too.
Interesting.
He is a great-great-grandson in the male line of Emperor Nicholas I of Russia and Grand-nephew of Nicholas II
Well I am Croat American.
I know.
Might name my future kid Tomislav ๐
I don't fetishize monarchies but I quite like the aesthetic of them.
Realistically Monarchies cannot happen because they're played out and don't fit
True.
But I'm not allergic to them like you are
^
Radtrads are fucking gay though
@Krieg But you know precisely what I mean? In the net, if you see some smoloko tier post jacking off to divine tsarism and the Russian royal family, it can only ever be posted by two people: Deracinated traditionalist burger or a retarded russian patriotard.
Yeah I know what you mean exactly I used to hang out in radtrad mad-monarchist tier skype groups
Wait, people still care about Feudalism?
No they didn't want feudal monarchies they just wanted a monarch with authority to various degrees
a lot of them thought they would even have titles
like wt
wtf
Monarch , Dictator , Chieftan all basically the same thing
All of the internet monarchists are either English American or Russian
Some are just fancier then others
Not even british
just SPECIFICALLY English
Geesh Kombowl still typing
I see the appeal in authoritarian dictatorships but I don't know why they have to mask it in a monarchy
Eastern Europe is pretty hostile to Tsarism for obvious reasons, and western europe just viewed it as an irrelevant third world monarchy. Shilling for Tsarism, even just the historical one, just couldn't happen as an European nationalist. Even extremely religious Poles hate Tsarism for trying to enforce Orthodox state religion and sending catholic priests to Siberia and destroying churches and building Russian ones in place.
And you know, Nicholas being extremely incompetent and massively contributed to bolshevization and judaization of his country.
Yeah Nicky was a god damn retard
Yeah, that's pretty much how I feel too Bowlsta. Why do we have to do this gay "royal family" dance, just say it for what it is.
Nick was extremely naive
There was once an assassination attempt on his life while he was giving a speech and he just kept reading it. Not because he was brave or anything but because he legitimately did not understand somebody was trying to kill him
But it depends if your a Christcuck or not a Monarch is basically just a Dictator with Divine inspired authority.
You don't need to be a christcuck to accept divine authority
Divine inspired authority is still the gayest thing I've ever heard of.
Principles dictate man cannot speak for god, for it would be blasphemy. Yet these people can interpret the word of God and not be blasphemous???
fake and gay
Nick was very naive he trusted the Brits & Americans because muh WW1 allies basically and they fucked him hard.
Nicholas was incapable and uninterested in ruling and delegated a ton of authority when Russia needed a strong leader more than ever.
^
Disavowing devine authority is a post-enlightenment idea. Up until then and through all of human history rulers were considered either divinely inspired or gods themselves.
Romans did it
Egyptians did it
Scands did it to an extent
Greeks did it
^
Maybe it's my Scandinavian roots showing
I think its more Prot concept to have no hierarchical order
I understand the concept fully, you see a man that seems to "walk amongst the Gods" because he does things that are so brave, fierce, etc., it does make sense. But I still think it's gay.
My grandparents are literal immigrants from Norway I'm a third gen american.
way back when in pagan times even scandis had a pseudo divine-right concept
And at the same time he expected people to shower him with gratitude and reverence regardless of personal weakness. The unwillingness of the Russian Whites to cooperate with other white movements was the nail to their coffin, as they refused to cut their losses. Mannerheim and Finnish White Guard volunteered their support to Whites to re-take St. Petersburg from Petrograd Soviet, but Yudenich refused because that would have equaled recognition of Finnish independence, even if it would have guaranteed capture of St. Petersburg and breaking the spine of the newborn communist state.
It's prot education that tells you no such thing exists
Your concept FullMetal doesnt make sense but agree to disagree i guess
Scandinavians were only catholic for like 100 years so the concepts of Prots took root a lot better there than in other countries
@Kombat-Unit muh russians wont accept I exist
Joke's on them their country stopped existing.
I'm third gen as well Bowlsta
Grandmother's maiden name is Johansen
She married a fuckin mick >_>
My surname is still incredibly scandinavian
Norwegian specifically
I think there is some truth in it , it is also a huge part of American education to mock divine rule
As if it was some crazy guy who said i speak for God now bahahaha
The same way they speak of abstract concepts of the righteousness of democracy
Yeah divine right isn't some crazy guy saying god speaks to him
Founding a country on enlightement values and masonism not even once.
It's more of a pointing out that metaphysical inequalities exist thing
Elaborate on that more
Metaphysical inequalities exist
And every ruler pre democracy was a " Tryant " lol
Not everyone is equal in the spiritual realm or on earth essentially.
Some people have more spiritual clarity than others as an example
And to clarify, I don't assume divine right is some crazy guy saying he's God.
The king is the king because all material comes from and is a mirror of the metaphysical and since he is better than you in the physical one can say he is better than you in the metaphysical
It's more nuanced and communally organized
Essentially
you can replace king with dictator or emperor or whatever you want
muh jesus being a carpenter
>Some people have more spiritual clarity than others as an example
t. EH
https://youtu.be/ygQ2nvmpDsM
39,554 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 71/396
| Next