#general (Discord ID: 359431474572820482) in Cascade Front, page 29
Security Advisory: Links in messages may lead to maliciously operated websites that could track your IP address and reveal your identity, or they may contain harmful files. The DiscordLeaks team does not check links and cannot make any statements about the safety of following these links.
Some ways to protect yourself are:
- Do not open files downloaded from links, and do not run any programs that try to download themselves to your computer.
- Use anonymization measures such as Tor Browser or a VPN.
If you are using the Privacy Badger or other privacy extensions, you may need to whitelist Discord and related domains in order for the images to load.
Sounds like you guys have really rustled some jimmies up there lol
So it seems like you guys are locked in a propaganda war with sjw hippies over conflicting visions for the PNW
Apparantly you guys were also at Charlottesville, is that true?
>That CascadiaNow profile picture referencing star wars
The Left really just can't stop depending on references to juvenile media, can they?
Yes some of us attended charlettsville, we were on discord but several WN discord got shoad so we moved to a forum.
We don't do as much postering with our name as we used to. But ya we chose the name cascadia to piss off those liberal fags.
Does anyone have this same piece, but the graphics are slightly different?
I've seen it somewhere- can't seem to find it online.
I believe it's exactly the same however the only difference is in graphic design.
did the discord server ever get told that there was a dude running people over?
or was the just the one person? @Rolf CASCADIA#2479
you said it was related to the Virginia protest?
even her mother confirmed this
because she was a disgusting fat swine holy shit
did you see the video where they were CPRing that disgusting corpulent beast
waves of jiggle
i haven't seen the video
but jfc i don't want to
it's not worth the eye-damage
st least she died with dignity u. u
you're right though it was a heart attack, but she did get a leg injury
her leg broke because it couldn't handle the weight of her body
that's probs true
I have a fat side of the family that has that kind of condition all the time
they constantly need new hips or have knee problems, it's pretty terrible
mainly from being born and raised on an american diet of fat and corn syrup
get rid of welfare monkeys and clean up the diet of the average american
and we'll be one step closer to a better america
kill fat people
use them as fuel for powerplants
their blubber would make an excellent fuel source
you know that they have to make special 'fat people' crematoria
fat people burn WAAYY too hot
are you fucking serious
LOTS of entire crematoria centres have burned to the ground
i thought it was just like they needed extra large ovens
because they didn't consider the extra heat that comes with burning fat
The danger of fires when cremating obese bodies isn't an entirely unknown issue for the funeral service profession: "As you may realize, when a morbidly obese person is cremated, there's a danger of what can only be called (in layman's terms) a 'grease fire,'" according to Caleb Wilde, a licensed professional who runs the blog Confessions of a Funeral Director.
In October 2014, a Virginia facility caught fire while cremating a 500-pound body. Fire investigators there said excessive heat ignited rubber roofing near the crematorium's smoke stack. Another fire, two years earlier in Austria, left firefighters "covered with a layer of sooty grease."
forced exercise regimen when
death by jumping jacks
use as fuel is the only contribution theyll ever have to society
in a serious context for the fat problem people need to abandon anything with corn syrup
which is actually really difficult
so apparently finnish machinegunners had to switch during battles because they became mentally unstable from *slaughtering* so many soviets :' )
it's not difficult to buy fucking vegetables and potatos roman, lmao
you're right though, just eating healthy pretty much avoids those things
if your food isn't literally garbage, you wont need to put ketchup on it for flavour
I don't have much of a budget so usually i'm just eating chicken and vegetables covered in olive oil
I recently lost 40 lbs, in the span of about 3 months, using a combination of prolongued fasting (twice, once for 5 days, the second for 26 days) and a plat-based/whole-foods diet
I've been able to keep it off by just being reasonable about what I eat, not trying too hard to follow any specific diet plan, etc.
so if you want to lose weight, you could always just not eat for a few weeks lol
I don't need to lose weight, I just need muscle mass
gains is 50% work, 25% diet, and 25% getting enough sleep
I haven't been doing the work :p
sometimes... I did feel like my back hurt, probably from kidneys and dehydration
during the longer fasting period, if i was feeling particularly bad, I'd have a piece of fruit or if I had baked a loaf of bread, I'd have an ultra thin slice to taste it
Think he's getting redpilled on (((them)))
Alex Jones is nuts though'
thank you for the welcome
Anyone remember when I said, "What if we were succesful in establishing our ethnostate, only for yellowstone blow and destroy us all?" Well.... http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-10-11/threat-supervolcano-eruption-yellowstone-greater-we-thought
molymeme is cracking guys
hes had enough
zerohedge is trash
read it for fun sure, post it seriously without several other sources
tfw no white nationalist friends to hang out with
I know that feel
my friend supports BLM
did you point out that theyre basically a terrorist organization?
it doesnt matter
yeah probably not
yeah i tell everyone who mentions it
but there is one super christian, traditional girl that agrees with me
BLM could actively cry out that theyre going to kill every white in a city and it'll either be downplayed or given cognitive dissonance so that theyre in the right
@here Since film club will happen at 8pm on sat, I'm thinking of doing a voice meeting and hour before, at 7pm, hope to see you there
let me know if thats a good time for you guys
Hey all! I know it’s been a min since I was last here
Figured I’d update y’all on a few things
As you may have known - I’ve joine Vanguard America and will continue to work and recruit for them
Has anyone ever considered creating a colony in a foreign country?
Monthly rent in Thailand for one person is ~$100 for example.
There's examples of things like this working out fairly well. Like Blumenau, Brazil, the German colony.
someone here recently talked about his group which plans to start a community in a depopulated part of africa
Namibia to be precise
but theres a reason those places are cheap, why would I want to live in places with even fewer white people
places that are also full of poisonous insects and are hot and humid constantly
youre not going to preserve the white identity in a jungle in a 3rd world country
Yeah I think those are definitely valid concerns.
But my argument would be that some of these countries are close to having the same amount of freedom that the USA has (which will only get worse in the coming decades).
And that maybe we should be colonizing other regions just in case the Western countries decide to restrict our movement once they flip from free to non-white tyrannies that force outbreeding.
"Don't put all of your eggs in one basket" type of thing.
I dont see how you can say they're more free, the governments in all of these poor countries value your rights far less than the US government does. What do you think these places are like?
not to mention these countries are much worse off economically and have hordes of brown people who have no problem killing you and taking your stuff
That's true. But I think in terms of buying our own property, keeping to ourselves and building a community that creates its own value, some of them are more open to that than the USA.
And you can create your own wealth through IT with online businesses.
Basically NeoAmish *that advance tech.
How are they more open to that than the US? There are already many such groups operating freely in America, like the Amish
Also many of these countries are not very good for business, due to poor infrastructure and beurocracy
Would America STILL be open to that though? Would it be open to creating a new group like the Amish? I don't think they would. Maybe I'm wrong though.
The Amish people are already established and respected due to that.
You obviously are wrong, America has always allowed such groups to exist and I see no reason that would stop any time soon. And again, why do you assume this would go over better in a poor, corrupt 3rd world country?
I dont think you apprechiate how good America still has it compared to most other countries out there
America has always allowed such groups to exist (Under White rule)
Those countries rules are relatively stable and we could adapt to them.
America could rapidly change in its rules, just as it has in its demographics.
(Sorry, had to answer the door)
And I can agree to some of these countries being corrupt, or even most of them. But I was just wondering if we had people scouting them out as potential colonies.
"America has always allowed such groups to exist (Under White rule)" And you think its a good idea to move to a country that doesnt have white rule as it is? this makes no sense what so ever
I'm thinking from a more longterm perspective.
and theyre not that stable, the US is far more stable by comparison
If nothing happens and nonwhites aren't deported in the next 2 decades for example
whats your point, in the long term the US will still likely be a better place to live than most of the rest of the world, Brazil or Thailand aren't going to magically become white and not corrupt in the long term
deported from where?
Deported from the USA. They will just outbreed us until there's no money left. And then the SHTF.
Nobody is getting deported, I dont have high hopes for the futre of the US, but saying that whites are getting deported in the next 20 years is completely nonsensical and paranoid
All I am asking is your opinion one whether or not you think it's a good idea to have a colony within another region that may not be the best place to live, but at least it won't swing from what the USA was to a 3rd world country in a very short amount of time.
I don't think Whites will be deported. I think they will crack down on us hard though. Homeschooling will be illegal and white communities could be banned (they already kind of are).
Mass brainwashing will ramp up.
Racial taxation, etc
No country will be better off than they US 20 years from now, maybe with the exception of a few very white nothern ones like Canada or Iceland
And we know the direction theyre going
>starting a white ethno state
Most of those poorer countries already have absurd population densities, and already have rebels and militias wandering the countryside, murdering and stealing from farmers
that sounds terrible, there would be no security guaranteed and i'd imagine the governments there would bully us
yeah not to mention bandits
Yeah you have to be pretty damned brave to start a new colony in Africa.
Well, I would suggest doing research on other regions every 5 years or something like that. The entire world is pretty volatile right now and things could change. When nonwhites have control of the nukes in the West, we shouldn't have already taken the option of having a colonies in the southern hemisphere off the table.
Either way, thanks for the back and forth. I appreciate it.
Building in Africa is a bad idea... because it would be awesome and nogs would nog it up and want in on it.
Thailand is also a bad idea
You wouldn't get enough people to come and stay to maintain a pure bloodline
Southern Brazil is a slightly better idea (I was born in Northeastern Brazil)
and places like thailand simply do not have good land that isnt already occupied by lots of brown people
there's a LOT of pure europeans in the southernmost two or 3 states
and the weather is really good
and the people are awesome, and very beautful
Patagonia is an option
Patagonia is good if you don't mind the occasional earthquake, but it lacks big game
and a stable European population
We'd have a hard time getting people over there, and having them stay there
PNW is our only option, and there's also Appalachia
Say what you will about the current state of politics, at the end of the day America is still the only country with 112 guns per capita
and that means alot
yeah it really does
There's a reason why it's the core state of Western Civilization, while also being one of the youngest
Giving that up isn't wise
the European people here are just too valuable. The culture we've built is too valuable.
i ❤ america
Furthermore, in many of the countries that have low gun ownership, many of those guns are owned by warlords, druglords, and various other criminals (that list doesn't include guns owned by the military). As much as shitlibs like to whine about Americas gun culture, the guns are still mostly owned by decent citizens which is very important, and if there's ever a chimpout, all of your neighbors will be ready to shoot.
>mfw supposed las vegas shooter could just be shot at and killed if people in las vegas decided to have guns
there's a reason we have guns, and that's to stop criminals and defend ourselves from the government should they ever become tyrannical
Also should the government ever collapse, having a gun in the hand of every law-abiding citizen is critical to maintaining order
In deep red, very conservative (very white) places in this country, almost everyone owns a gun, and a large percentage of people carry guns all the time... no problems
but when black people in urban areas have guns, it's a war zone
so if there ever was a SHTF situation, I'd fel much safer around white people with guns than around white people without guns
>mfw africans went from spear chuckers to bullet chuckers because "muh slavery"
I have a question about nationalism and accepting inequality, but still wanting to live in an altruistic community that shares and helps each other
how can the two simultaneously exist without being hypocritical?
for instance if there was ever a family that was on the brink of going homeless and another accepts them into their house is that gearing more towards communism?
what do you mean? Theres a middle ground between anarcho-capitalism and communism
helping your neighbors is not communism
are people who donate to charities inherently communist?
being a nice person and having the morality to assist your fellow white man is not communism
I suppose I want a drawn border between altruism and socialism
if a community forced me to share then is it socialist
but if I share on my own accord is it charity?
being forced to share is leaning to communism, i believe
as in the great words of adolf hitler "instead we say: german people, help yourself"
@Roman Dreams your question is fundamentally an anthropolical one... why does indifference and alturism exist simultaneously in the same species?
the answer has to do with social habits, dunbar's number, in-group/out-group, and kin selection
dunbar's number refers to how many primates can exist in one social group, as extrapolated by brain measurement... Robin Dunbar measured the brain and the troop size of many different kinds of primate and found that this roughly correlates
our number is about 150... meaning we can only keep track of our social obligations to about 150 people, and remember their obligations to us
beyond that and our brain automatically "kicks one out"
to accomodate the new one coming in
so when we form these social groups we become intensely altruistic toward them, usually they're related to us so helping them increases their chances of passing down DNA (which you have in common)
J. B. S. Haldane, evolutionary biologist, famously sayd "I would lay down my life for two brothers or eight cousins" to illustrate this point
So this is why nationalism makes sense to me... it fits in with out desire to see our own people succeed, while at the same time it allows us to express being protective of them against the out-group. These different traits have been honed and tuned to differing degrees across populations as they adapted to different climates, but the fundamental program is the same... be suspicious toward outsiders, but treat your people like family. Nationalism formalizes this understanding so that it can spread across a bigger society than just 150. We do this by maintaining a common language, culture, and genetic heritage.
fucking deep shit
i'm spending 38 fuckin dollars for 3 pizzas and chocolate lava cakes
f a t
pretty cheap though for 3 pizzas
3 large pizzas
is it someone's birthday or just lunch time?
If it hasn't already been considered, I would definitely look into the drinking water at whatever site/town is chosen. The whole 'fluoride in the water' meme actually got confirmed by Harvard of all places.
>THE WATER IS TURNING THE FROGS GAY
unironically and literally, as it turns out
@guderian there is fluoride in the water and it's deliberately added where I live at least
tfw brain dead between 14 years of soccer and fluoride drinking
cool powdered slut in your pic 😄
All my bones ache
pack your bags
how can we recover? etc
white supremacy or bust
i wave my swastika flag
I have a problem with the swastika as an american and ideologically
as in using it in the modern day?
rule under fascism would suck
also using it as an American, since it's a foreign movement
I just want decentralization, not a super nation that watches over me
america is a democracy
which is a foreign movement taken from ancient athens
i don't think foreign movements aren't too bad
the nazi movement is inherently German pride though
we can take foreign systems and put them into a context for our own countries
nazism mainly prized itself with patriotism, nationalism, and racial supremacy
but to say uber allies as an American is wrong