general
Discord ID: 257263229422534677
54,683 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 37/547
| Next
going*
anonys ftw
we'll have to start using tor to access real news lol
haha
I remember that 0, i wish i could hvae been there
and it was on my server!
SO FYNNY
illidan US
i have questions about snowdens loyalties but i think using tor, linux, and all that kind of thing for security is really a step in the right direction
you guys ever used tor?
not me
it encrypts your outgoing internet traffic and puts it through like 4 foreign servers before exiting a server somewhere and access the regular internet
its not impossible to trace somebody using tor but youd have to have a lot of resources, like NSA level shit
lol
nah
it's pretty easy to trace things
#ScriptKiddies Ftw
i have a few .exe i can give you that will do whatever you want
knock a server offline - get you info - etc
how would you track tor users?
get on the tor server
with root
and look at all connections
TOR is fucked
youd have to hit the exit node
people who run tor exit nodes arent internet noobs
not hard to get into any computer that is online.
just saying. if someone wants it they can get it.
alright ill get on tor and log in here and you find my ip lol
I can do that since you're connected to here.
lol
no need for you to tor
it's pointless at best
i dont mean since im on here now
i mean you try to get it again while im on tor
Helpful background info
but not about Tor
The problem is that all connections are compromised at the ISPs
This has always been the weakness of the IP system
my argument about race is that we're all mixed to some level, even if its only 1%
If you are upstream EXCLUSIVELY from something, you can toast it
i think all the "one drop rule" people are ignorant
@bb22 of course, given your test results, but consider a middle path
can toast anything that is online like i said.
miscegenation is death, and trace admixture is a problem
test results?
the only way to do a dark web would be an encrypted end-to-end app
invisible entirely
and highly vetted
these exist, but are not for casual use
lol probably be slow too
like freenet
@bb22 i think you had mentioned a drop of something in your ancestry results
i dont think you can access open internet easily with freenet but ive never used it
with tor you literally have to target their servers and at that point youd be messing with people who arent internet noobs like i said
@MrGoat it would be slow if decentralized
true
diversity, i didnt do a DNA test. i did historical research into my family tree going back in the 1600s
i found the actual documentation of my ancestors
ah, OK
how interesting
i did historical research on my family. turns out my dad is from England and my mom is a Czech from Germany. looks like i'm white
DNA tests are better
@Jossi sounds white to me
i is
WHITE POWER 1488
out of 500-1000 direct ancestors i have from the early 1700s i only found a fraction of them documented and 1 black man
i'm tired of typing the slash
@bb22 back of the bus! jk
my point is that when you have 500-1000 direct ancestors from 300 years ago the odds of them all being 100% white are slim to none, thus "one drop rule" being ignorant
see the links in that gab post
facts disagree
i wouldn't take it too seriously though
that makes you 0.0025% african or something like that
i wonder if people are angry that i, as a white man, have default access to white women
yes
"where da white women at?"
okay im going to open that link you sent and we're going to talk about it in detail
wooooord up niggaz
have fun
it's fascinating stuff
youll have fun with me lol
we have fun with everything
we're going to talk about it because i know how these tests work
half-troll, half-activist
there is a big flashing light that says NEGRO DETECTED and then you never get into a hip club again
that's how the tests work?
the website you sent has to do with associating certain genes locations based on where they occur most commonly
how does that relate to fact that "one drop rule" is a bunch of bullshit?
"Understanding the genetic structure of human populations is of fundamental interest to medical, forensic and anthropological sciences. Advances in high-throughput genotyping technology have markedly improved our understanding of global patterns of human genetic variation and suggest the potential to use large samples to uncover variation among closely spaced populations"
if you read the abstract of the scientific study theyre citing, the purpose of the study was explicitly to gather data from particular geographic locations in europe and map the relative genetic similarity of the people living in those areas as opposed to people further away from those areas
the one drop rule is not bullshit, within a certain number of generations
yes, exactly: most people breed with those like them
thus the random breeding thesis is bullshit ๐
so the whole purpose of this particular study was basically to measure minute markers of how inbred people are in given geographical locations in europe today
"most people breed with those like them" -- im not disputing that
54,683 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 37/547
| Next