rr
Discord ID: 313472492918538243
379 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/2
Nah not a rush.
I usually take several days to complete a video.
๐๐ป
Indeed, white power.
Well I think I jus tliked my own message like a narcissistic asshole.
@TNB the marshmallow study is good but I don't know if they break it down by race
The best studies are IQ and brain structure stuff
@vaultright Thanks I will check it out.
Summary of Human Differences
We are often told that all men are created equal, but this is the biggest lie in world history. Not one person was ever born equal to another; some people have worse hearing and some people have better, some people are blind and some people have better than perfect vision. It is obvious when this is examined that this notion is simply lunacy. The crux of inequality applies not only in regards to the differences in the sexes (as centrists like Sargon of Akkad like to point out), but to even beyond that in the human races. These racial differences can even be broken down further into ethnic group differences, but the broadest category that covers the most differences is race. โWhat actually is race?โ you may ask. Well race is simply put, the taxonomically defined different genetic ancestral groups. Races can be identified by genetic testing, bone structure, skull shape, skull size, and a variety of different biological aspects. Races score differently on intelligence tests, and these intelligence tests are 50-80% genetically determined. (As evidenced by twins reared apart studies, transracial adoption studies, and genes being identified in association with intelligence) This is due to the evolutionary differences in how groups evolved. Some groups (Europeans and East Asians) evolved in the far north where cold winters and agriculture accelerated the development of civilization. It put a higher bar for traits like intelligence and deferral of gratification. This is evidenced by the work of Philippe Rushton, Richard Lynn, Charles Murray, Steven Pinker, and the many other accredited social scientists who have studied this topic. This is a large part of the explanation for why there is such large socioeconomic inequality in the world.
This is so true
this is on the sexes rather than race
how long is this?
In fact, a case
where a person of one nationality is closer genetically to someone
of a distant nationality than to his or her own compatriots
never happens. If youโre Swedish, every Swede (not counting
recent immigrants) is genetically closer to you than any person
in Japan.
For whatever reason, a lot of people think that regression to the mean will keep happening to someoneโs descendants until they research original populationโs mean. This is not true. Once the next generation inherits an additive genetic advantage in some trait it keeps it. Their kids and their grand kids will continue to have it.
Can anyone here please link to evidence that hapas are more likely to have mental health problems?
Thanks
He's arguing "no it's actually different if they are specifically Japanese-German hapas"
What a retard
Because they'll be the master race or something
@asdf this applies universally
Objectives. This study compared the health and risk status of adolescents who identify with 1 race with those identifying with more than 1 race.
Conclusions. Adolescents who self-identify as more than 1 race are at higher health and behavior risks. The findings are compatible with interpreting the elevated risk of mixed race as associated with stress.
speaking of which
two idiots with no expertise are mad at Rage After the Storm
@vaultright apologize for the tag but misinfo annoys me
and I want people to know this will be happening
kraut and jeff are about to go full steven jay gould on us @The Goat
I'd like to see what the have to say lol
Probably radical centrist nonsense
if you want a taste of Holiday (it seems like his thing, just using Kraut's platform) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUs2ZdLksSc&t=52s
I think iowa is a good place to live
Not very scenic compared to other Midwest states, but probably the most conservative.
Dr. Sakaluk,
My roommate had some reading assigned to him in class and I decided to read the article as well. I felt like some of the claims that it made were wrong and I wanted your opinion. Below is a quote from the article.
โThere is no biological basis for classifying race according to skin color instead of body formโor according to any other variable, for that matter. All that exists is variability in what people look likeโand the arbitrary and culturally specific ways different societies classify that variability. There is nothing left over that can be called race. This is why race is a myth.โ
Itโs my understanding that we can almost exactly classify people, surely not based on some phenotype but based on things like haplogroups and mitochondrial DNA. Putting people into a "Race" is surely a shallow classification but it could be done. Is this incorrect? This article later goes on to talk about how Americans believe that an Avocado is a vegetable because they eat it in salad but a Brazilian will tell you itโs a fruit because they eat it with sugar; and that just like this example cultural differences change the perspectives of people. This still doesn't change the fact that an Avocado is a fruit. I feel like this article conflates a lot of scientific topics. Specifically saying that simply because there is no accurate way to classify people based on phenotype that there is no way to classify them at all. Am I wrong?
I've gotten to a point where debating people on this has become tiresome. I've just become smug and sarcastic. If you're debating someone about race realism ask them to describe the process of Evolution to you. Ask them to describe the specific selection pressures that confer adaptations to mammals and how they work. If a person doesn't understand the biological principle of Adaptive Radiation then debating them will literally go nowhere.
I've realized the most vocal people discussing and pushing the (((Narrative))) that we are all the same have no idea what they are talking about.
In spite of all that
I can't tell you how much I enjoyed speaking with you. I will be out-of-town for the next month, but I definitely want to get together with your group later in the Fall.
Thanks for sending the article. I know Pigliucci through science, and in fact, he reviewed parts of one of my books.
Doug Whitman
that's the e-mail i recieved from Whitman
@ouroboros LIT
Regression Happens Once
For whatever reason, a lot of people think that regression to the mean will keep happening to someoneโs descendants until they research original populationโs mean. This is not true. Once the next generation inherits an additive genetic advantage in some trait it keeps it. Their kids and their grand kids will continue to have it.
Were this not true, evolution would be impossible. Every time a mutation resulted in a genetic change in a trait the next few generations would simply regress back to where the trait was before. Evolution happens, and so regression to the mean clearly does not work this way.
Letโs imagine that my height is 100% the result of a new additive mutation that makes people 50% further, in a positive direction, from their sexes mean height than average. Letโs also assume that my mate has the same new mutation. We are the only two people who have it. We will both give that mutation our kids. They will be just as tall as us. After all, they have the same genes that made us tall. There is nowhere else for the genes to go. Thus, no regression to the mean happens, right?
Well, yes and no. Yes, my kids are just as far from the original populationโs height mean as I am. However, the populationโs mean height has changed. Thanks to the new mutation being given to my kids, the populationโs mean height has risen. Thus, the distance between my kids height and the population mean is less than the initial distance between my height and the population mean was. So, there is a sense in which, as the mutation continues to be spread across the population, everyone will return to โthe meanโ. But it will be a new mean, and that is not regression to the mean.
Catholicism is the third position of religion https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/17576356/
so it marries volk with loyalty to God?
sounds about right
trad cath that is
@vaultright got any good stuff explaining how Sub suharan africans are far worse than 'African Americans' ?
Jews aren't human
Do you see slavs as White?
Pale skin, hair clolor varries as well their eyes. I'd classify that as white
Me on the other hand I look like belong in some cave in the depths of Afghanistan
Or driving an Uber speaking Armenian
Same difference tbh
Kek
Slavs are indo european they are white
Well, Indians are also Indo-Europeans
And Iranians
Armenians, Kurds, Georgians
You see what I am getting at kek?
@Abaraxs, Lord of Hosts are you white?
And all those people would have been much whiter before the turkish and arab invasions
I would describe myself as white.
Sounds iffy...
Kek, I agree.
But to answer you, I have brown wavey hair, hazel eyes and tanned skin.
Atleast, I am not a chimpanize or a nigger.
Other wise, I wouldn't be able to make this conversation we are having currently.
Hazel eyes are master race eyes my dood
๐
Where are you from? @Abaraxs, Lord of Hosts
Australia, mate.
New south wales
I see
Probably huwite <:KKomrade:261639983457107978>
Nah, I am a "Syrian Refugee" who fucks Swedish women.
As seen here
https://youtu.be/pvJqQmHxO9k
However will you recover from all this "enlightened" skepticism
Looks like an Angsty Modern Art exibition
He wont join the Alt right becasue he doesnt like the way "it devolves the human" and not evolves it.
Lolwut
^
Hey does anyone have that data that shows the whole "blacks commit more crime because they're poor" thing is bullshit
I've since lost it due to it being on my old phone which broke
that should work
I was unable to purge some messages older than 14 days due to a limitation in Discord.
vroom vroom
vroom vroom
This should give you some additional information
I was talking shit with a dindu last night who claimed (before he blocked me) that white supremacists killed more Americans between 2000-2016 than radical Islamists, citing this as a source:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3924852-White-Supremacist-Extremism-JIB.html
The most violent year of WSE was 2015, with nine deaths.
Confirming what we already know, that apparently dindus can't read. lol
๐
๐
379 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/2