>M-m-m-muh freedom to rape a child before going to jail

>goes to jail BEFORE raping the child

>waaaaaah my rights

>goes to jail for no reason
muh rights

>For no reason

>Proven to be a child predator

>I-I-I didn't act on it yet

No.

Literally how you can tell someone is a pedo

>Muh schrodinger's pedo that never exhibed signs of being a pedo

you need to give up

that imaginary case

because no one will ever notice him

when we speak of pedos

we obviously

are speaking of people

who have demonstrably

shown interests

into diddling children

Yes.

Why?

Because otherwise you can't tell they're a pedo

and it becomes irrelevant

Yes.

Wrong.

Wrong.

Listen.

One second

you low IQ

mongrel

No

Yes.

But to appose judgement

you fucking

idiot

you need to demonstrate

Absolutely wrong.

who is this headcanon pedo we're basing everything on

Tom's schrodinger pedo.

Dumbass

Tom

we need to know someone is a pedo

before judging them for being a pedo

and how do you know they are a pedo?

well

who is they

their kind happens to turn itself in

by expressing intent

by storing CP

once one is demonstrated to BE a pedophile

we can act against them

your non-existant invisible pedo

wouldn't be an issue

posessing cp is already a crime

No.

Unless

you say

admitting to being a pedophile

is a crime

I mean.

Is it a crime?

>So you're only going to be able to find out if someone is a pedo after they have committed a crime

>Ee-e-e-e-e-xcpet those you can find out the other way but that doesn't count

lmao

you're actually retarded.

There also are many patterns they exhibit

men like sex with women that makes them all rapists let's lock em up

which technically aren't crimes

Eretard out there with the false analogies

I think

you're pretty fucking thick

if you haven't understood

my position

It really seems like you are defending pedophilia Tom

sis pre-emptive action against pedophiles

@Leaf me alone he literally proves me right every single time

as if you were an actual lawyer

as if he was concerned about defending himself

against such charges

>muh thin line

Tinker Tom.

Do you identify as a pedophile?

I mean

you said only low IQ pedos would out themselves

so you'd probably lie.

oof

same

You're simply projecting that pattern of behaviour

to other pedos

because you don't want us to know

you're a pedo

although literally every single person in OH knows already

So

you admit to being a pedo

and defending pedophilia

unless you were trying to promote and normalize it

because of that

Tom has what we could call a stake in the race

the normalization and deregulation of pedophilia directly benefits Tom

you literally

said