when we speak of pedos
we obviously
are speaking of people
who have demonstrably
shown interests
into diddling children
Yes.
Why?
Because otherwise you can't tell they're a pedo
and it becomes irrelevant
Wrong.
Listen.
One second
you low IQ
mongrel
No
But to appose judgement
you fucking
idiot
you need to demonstrate
Absolutely wrong.
who is this headcanon pedo we're basing everything on
Tom's schrodinger pedo.
Dumbass
Tom
we need to know someone is a pedo
before judging them for being a pedo
and how do you know they are a pedo?
well
who is they
their kind happens to turn itself in
by expressing intent
by storing CP
once one is demonstrated to BE a pedophile
we can act against them
your non-existant invisible pedo
wouldn't be an issue
posessing cp is already a crime
