retard ethot
ily2
So.
To make this clear.
Tom's argument
>It's my freedom to want to fuck children
>You can't arrest me until I destroyed someone's life
No, you be real.
How have you become so twisted?
>arrest possible pedos for thought crime ok big brother
>M-m-m-muh freedom to rape a child before going to jail
>goes to jail BEFORE raping the child
>waaaaaah my rights
>goes to jail for no reason muh rights
>For no reason
>Proven to be a child predator
>I-I-I didn't act on it yet
No.
Literally how you can tell someone is a pedo
>Muh schrodinger's pedo that never exhibed signs of being a pedo
you need to give up
that imaginary case
because no one will ever notice him
when we speak of pedos
we obviously
are speaking of people
who have demonstrably
shown interests
into diddling children
Yes.
Why?
Because otherwise you can't tell they're a pedo
and it becomes irrelevant
Wrong.
Listen.
One second
you low IQ
mongrel
No
