No mention of success

<:HyperLmao:459545665517780993>

I just heard asian supremacy when I came back in

STRAWMAN

Not denying race exists, but what happens when biotech is so advanced that individuals can change their own racial features?

@CryptoBlok Race dies

Because the tribes will change

If they want to become white.... Good

😂

Will it become more about Aesthetics?

obviously traditional racial/ethnic blocks collapse and reform into blocks that are even more differentiated

No one cares about which mortal combat clan their on because if shit hits they change it

and it will be defunct soon

I don't want to argue his anti science position again

"Oooh, that shade looks SO good on you, Xaryla!"

Make the question about genetic engineering

it's not anti-science

That's interesting

The problem with pure ethnoationalism

It's an interesting question

@Deleted User Read How to Win Friends and Influence People about EQ

its a very good read

Genetic testing and engineering

@ManAnimal It covers the ways to improve EQ

@Deleted User race is still a sub-optimal grouping mechanism if you're trying to select for highly polygenetic traits such as intelligence or emotional temperament, and there's no particular reason if you're trying to exclude and/or include people based upon traits such as intelligence to do so along racial lines

the genetics of different population groups fall along normal distributions and are not uniform across any single group- genetics is something that acts out mechanistically on an individual level

@ManAnimal 36

Im glad yall are marking friends

@ManAnimal **IM A SCIENTOLOGY FAN**

L. Ron save me from volcano

@ManAnimal Ayn Rand's philosophies are overrated

They're still human souls, made in the (non-physical) image of God

@Deleted User His concern is that he will have to deal with competition

not his labor pool

He hates competition

@Deleted User They would

@ManAnimal Can you tell him what Im telling him

Sorry @Da_Fish

That was interesting to listen to

Sorry guys if i was a big carried away

I had to get off mic

Thanks @ManAnimal 👍

Thanks @Da_Fish

No prob.

You should jump in if you want @Da_Fish

Helps me get better

You're all welcome

come again

This was fun to listen to while I played games.

Same lol

aww sounds like I missed something hot af

"The short answer to this question is that our personalities have a genetic component. "

https://study.com/academy/lesson/is-personality-genetic-dnas-influence-on-temperament.html

Not only IQ

But temperament.

The science is robust on these issues

Hereditary.

He is pretending it's grey. It's not.

<:thanosdaddy:459545656479055873>

Intersectional Feminism is riddled with the exact same type of statitistical studies that reportantly validate their assertion the gender is a social construct.

Show me

If I take a sample of 100 people living in Europe for a study to find out if exposure to power lines over the long duration causes cancer and I fail to account for the fact that Europeans tend to smoke over 60% more than AMericans, my conclusion showing a high correlation of power line exposure to cases of cancer will be flawed.

Link?

The reason is that both smoking and power line exposure will show a positive correlation, thus my test variable was not controlled properly in my randomization.

I find ...... one sec

That's the tired "cultures aren't accounted for" argument. They already fixed that.

I feel like ur arguments are from 1990

http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/content/BPL_Images/Content_store/Sample_chapter/9781405132664/9781405132664_4_003.pdf

Lol

That's a lesson

Combinational variance of statistics:

http://reliawiki.org/index.php/RBDs_and_Analytical_System_Reliability

One of the longest, and at times most contentious, debates inWestern intellectual
history concerns the relative influence of genetic and environmental factors
on human behavioral differences, the so-called nature-nurture debate (Degler

http://web.missouri.edu/~segerti/1000H/BouchardRev.pdf

There are many in the soft-sciences that have misapplied statistical technicques which have given rise to very popular and well beleived theories and fields of study. One such example is the multiple worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. But this is an occupational hazard of academics.

Statistics used in such a way only points towards the possibility which is useful and worth examination.

It's so genetic soon it will be a spit test to determine iq....

You're just wrong.


Your constant guessing at potential biases are non-existent in reality regarding general intelligence.

But not evidence.

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/610339/dna-tests-for-iq-are-coming-but-it-might-not-be-smart-to-take-one/

Indirectly linked to intelligences

You're imagining problems that don't exist.

Lol

No.

Scientists only know about genes; not behaviour

Incorrect

Is behavior magical? It's easy to test.... An IQ test.

No scientist that studies genetics also has the same depth of education in behavioural sciences.

Lol

They are two VERY different fields of study and schooling.

You're not current in your understanding of the field. I encourage you to dig deeper.

You can beleive a phsyciatrist is a valid profession but 90% is not based in science.

It is based on behaviour studies. Not the same.

Your assertions imagined

Ok.

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/610339/dna-tests-for-iq-are-coming-but-it-might-not-be-smart-to-take-one/

Papers do a good job highlighting to fallacy

Invalid; do the math

The fallacy isn't there.

A fallacy can exist; in IQ studies it doesn't - potential problems have all been accounted for

"As of now, the predictions are not highly accurate. The DNA variations that have been linked to test scores explain less than 10 percent of the intelligence differences between the people of European ancestry who’ve been studied."

Where is the control variable?

Lol