If it is a characteristic then it exists within what it is a characteristic of.

Are you now saying that Morality is a characteristic of Objective Morality?

I'm not quite sure where we are.

Speed of light is a characteristic of everything and their relation to each other. There is no where.

It is a characteristic of nothing too

So it is every*where*?

And there is no such thing as nothingness.

Unless there is, but then we wouldn't know about it.

It is a fundamental aspect of the universes existence itself.

Nothing is the lack of existence.

To say it exists is a paradox.

If you made a void in the universe itself with nothing in it you would still have spacetime itself that governs the speed of light.

No, nothing is no thing, not a single thing.

If you created a void it would be a void.

Speed is something.

Speed is a concept

If something exists in nothing, it is not nothingness.

It doesn't exist per se

Not even a concept could exist in nothing.

Nothing is nothing.

Unfathomable.

Still, this is irrelevant.

What?

I want to know what is the objective morality that our morality is allegedly based upon.

the objective is the basis of morlas

morals*

As it exists, so I want to know what it is and how it is free from any interpretation.

i dont want this thing to happen to me, so it shouldent happend to anyone i dont like

do*

Morality's objectivity is like the speed of light, it is a characteristic of the universe itself.

>what does this mean

thats a meaningless statement

So it's a concept.

Speed of light is not a concept

Are you fucking stupid

But you also said the speed of light doesn't exist in anything...

what the fuck

That it isn't a "something"

the speed of light is abstract at best due the basis of numbers really dont have any meaning

Speed of light isn't just a number

The Math behind

the 'exsact' speed

is abstract

the litteral speed of light isnt

The exact speed is dependent on other characteristics of the universe

No it isnt, light distortion doesnt change the speed

The speed of light is a Universal Constant.

no matter the distance its the same speed

In a vacuum it always moves the same.

reguardless of a or the medium

its still has a constant speed

The exact speed of light is more of an emergent property of the universe

Thats false

Honestly, I really just want to know what you consider to be an objective morality.

Theoretically there could be another universe with different speed if other universal constants were different

Quick anwser there is none

And then give me an example of something that would be objectively wrong.

there is no 'true' morality

there is nothing objective

if you hae the abiility to deny then is isnt objective

hve*

That's stupid

no it inst

But for the sake of argument, there most definitely is.

There is an objective morality.

A true morality which presides over all, and takes precedence.

there is absolutely none, morlaity is fluid

you cant jsut do that

I want an example of something Objectively Wrong.

There is fucking none

Hush, child.

@Summī Imperator, 呪い殿 being the fucking president and walking out in the rain for 30 minutes only to die of hypothermia shortly after getting elected

That seems like a mistake, not something Morally Reprehensible.

no no no

if you do that

theres something objectively wrong with you

mexican sugar dancing

Morally Wrong.

like you have to be fucking retarded

to do that

Context is important.

***mexican surgar dancing***

there is no context

fucking a 80% decomposed boy and shocking it to make it move

disgrace of the dead is a commonly seen 'wrong' thing to do morally

So you support the idea of an objective morality?

i do not support it, if there is one i will

morality isnt objective at all

^^^^^^^^^

i was fucking around about the president thing

well actually

morality could be objective

***w h e e e e e s s s s s e e e e***

like babies are designed to make humans want to care for them

But you just said that Mexican Sugar Dancing is Objectively Wrong on a moral level...

so killing a baby is objectively immoral

COMMONLY

COMMONLY

COMMONLY

WRONG