chat
Discord ID: 452955220473806859
89,136 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 127/357
| Next
You guys should grow some balls and take over your government
We should, but we already have control.
Nope
We voted him in and the only person that can fire him was chosen by him, and the Queen won't step in because the UK would step in.
THE QUEEN LMAO
It's just that we choose to wait until the next election so we can vote against the Liberals and get the same problem.
The Queen has power here.
She can remove the Prime Minister if she chose to.
Did you move?
@Milk you’re an America nationalist right?
Just that if she tried to step in, British Parliament would try to further limit her powers.
Oh
I am one
@Summī Imperator, 呪い殿 any vote affecting the queen has to be approved by the queen
but there is a user with that exact name @Deleted User
and I'm not him
Oh okay
I was confused
the right cafe
more like
the left cafe
:DD
Got em
I’m shaking in my seat
Oy vey
I got kicked out of Right Wing United for no reason.
That was weird.
libtard trolled epic style
@Doctor Anon u lied to me :((
u dont own this server D:
@frizzy who are u?
painu
know pain
feel pain
you cannot mature
without knowing pain
weeb
You must be ready to burn yourself in your own flame. How could you rise anew if you have not first become ashes?
you call me a weeb
that's better
because you are immature
you do not know pain
daddy ubermensch
i will never forget yahiko's pain
I know the pain of interacting with weebs.
Watashi wa anata ga watashi ni denwa shite iru monode wanai
this world is full of immatures.
and thus
it is my duty to come in
and make the world know pain
Koko yori, sekai ni itami o
الحمد لله لقدرة السمع
why did I have over 4k notifications
server raid
o
im just gonna click mark as read...
today was my second week of college classes this semester
it's been going well
الحمد لله لقدرة السمع
i used to be an arabic weeb
but then i repented
الحمد لله لقدرة السمع
and moved
الحمد لله على قدرة الرؤية
Hmmmm
dude
الحمد لله على قدرة الرؤية#
Literally any other position imaginable > Liberals
Look how pathetic she is. It’s disgusting. She cannot handle any form of criticism. Imagine how foul her upbringing was with parents who never punished her mistakes
look how pathetic you are
i hate entitled bitches
it's disgusting
you can't handle getting muted
21tagtmeiern
You are immature.
imagine how foul your upbringing was with parents who never slapped you for being an annoying little bitch
you need to have a taste of pain
to mature
sekaimi no tore wa
ah yes the person in this discussion who doesn't model himself off of an anime character needs to mature
I take issue with people misrepresenting philosophy, and @εïз irma εïз’s brainlet way of dealing with it is muting me
ur not wrong but also no u
she's a catholic so objective morality is a thing as far as she's concerned
i think
If you continue to act like a retard I will continue to treat you like a retard.
That's how you deal with children.
the only retarded child is you
You cannot handle criticism
You behave like a spoiled toddler
"i know u r but what am i"
Please stop wasting my time.
Not even the Thomists or St augustine described their arguments as “objective morality”
You literally have no idea what you are talking about
The utilitarian versus deontological argument has been raging since the time of Bentham with all sorts of thought experiments by Kantians and others
But you have utterly missed the point of what the deontologist are trying to achieve
You are wasting everyone’s time by misinforming them and not correcting your errors
And muting people who call you out on it so that you can preserve your fragile ego
hmm
as someone who pretends to be educated about philosophy a lot
despite having a pretty basic knowledge of it
you seem like you're pretending to be educated about philosophy
"look at me i know who bentham is"
just how it looks to me
Excuse me, cunt, I rarely have a chance to go into depth because people like you ad hominem or mute me before we can go into a serious discussion
oh i forgot to congratulate you
u made a statement that was relevant without an ad hominem in it
Not even the Thomists or St augustine described their arguments as “objective morality”
then you said "You literally have no idea what you are talking about"
but we're making progress
Someone has to call a spade a spade
She shows me no consideration of basic western academic etiquette
I do not owe it to her
She’s prancing around discord LARPing like she knows something about the world. And people like you and others in this server cannot, or choose not, to discern between a mediocrity dribbling shit into the general and someone who is ready to impart arduously acquired knowledge.
ah yes your famous etiquette
>calling people kids or and time wasters
boy what a fine way to argue
lets remove people from the argument because i think they are below me
and it's your fault i can't tell
actually
i think ur a "medicrity dribbling shit into the general"
shut
idk about her
the
fuck
up
It should be apparent to everyone that @εïз irma εïз’s knowledge is from Wikipedia and everything I say comes from over a decade of meticulous reading and a thorough knowledge of the history of ideas that you could never acquire in seven lifetimes
y
Self absorbed much?
thorough knowledge of the history of ideas?
that doesn't seem likely
You have no basis to judge someone considerably older than you who holds a PhD
look
you can judge anyone
PhD doesn't matter
either ur a troll who doesn't have a phd, ur delusional and u don't have a phd, or ur a really sad human being who likely has psychological issues
The words of an uppity mediocrity
those are the only three reasons why you would be on this server posting this shit
The ignoramuses come swooping down into the chat like a flock of pesky starlings pecking at anyone who insults their little princess, Irma.
u just deserve to be insulted
because ur life is fundamentally sad
that's all
also i am a human and as a human i am qualified to talk about being human
You are truly an example of chivalry. The stuff of medieval fables come to life on our screens in the digital age.
so i can judge you
Irma should bow to you with a deep curtsy and bestow you with a knighthood
lol there was an article in the newspaper of my high school's sister school where this girl ranted about how a guy holding the door open for a girl is chivalry and therefore sexist
that was funny
e
I’m just trying to point out that deontology doesn’t imply “objective morality” as Irma mistakenly conflated the two concepts
Catholic philosophers have long grappled with how to perfect a moral argument because it is impossible to make an objective claim to morality even whilst appealing to scripture
Yet here is she is going on about objective morality and betraying a fundamental lack of basis in the field of ethics
Yet she chooses to continue this pretentious LARP even when someone with a PhD tells her she’s flat out wrong
Someone with a PhD doesn't matter
I already told you this
''they have a PhD, therefore all their claims are correct''
doesn't make sense
Au contraire it does matter - and just because a mediocrity like you wants to make himself feel better for being utterly worthless, it does not change how the world-at-large regards people who invested time and money into acquiring expertise
Then you clearly have not acquired mastery in any field, milk
If you have brushed the brink of what it means to have mastery then you wouldn’t for one second challenge someone who has put so much effort into a particular aspect of knowledge or skills
Tldr: you are lazy and mediocre and crippled by fundamental stupidity
That’s not what an appeal to authority fallacy is
This is often misunderstood along with the ad hominem because kids like you read a wikipage and think you can take on people who are just clearly better than you
Sorry, kid, there is a natural hierarchy and it enables me to piss on you from a great height
you must be trolling
Stating you have credentials doesn’t discredit the argument as fallacious. You would listen to a biologist on biology or a virologist if you want to learn more about the common cold on a microscopic level
I never said that
lmao
It’s when you say “x is true because Y said it” is when it becomes fallacious
Yes
Which I at no point stated
that's what I said
So you are either linking shit that is irrelevant to this conversation because you are absolutely fucking brain dead, or anyone with a better education triggers you and you are baiting in vain
''Au contraire it does matter - and just because a mediocrity like you wants to make himself feel better for being utterly worthless, it does not change how the world-at-large regards people who invested time and money into acquiring expertise
Then you clearly have not acquired mastery in any field, milk
If you have brushed the brink of what it means to have mastery then you wouldn’t for one second challenge someone who has put so much effort into a particular aspect of knowledge or skills'' you implied it here
you haven't provided any arguments, you've literally just been insulting people
“You would listen to a biologist on biology”
These are not fallacious statements
They are appeals to empiricism and academic standards which are the backbone of knowledge
I didn't say they were
Depends on what that biologist is saying about biology.
And I have given arguments and examples
where
when
Scroll up and read what I said about Thomism twice
If they don’t want to engage in my criticisms then I am not going to persist to debate with myself
You however should improve his reading comprehension and stop skimming through text before you make a fool of yourself again
Ah, your name changed again!
Looks as though somebody is trying to discredit you.
Now I suggest you step back before I make you eat the shit you tried to throw at me
you didn't provide an argument for why a PhD matters when it comes to someone judging you
Why?
you just said ''people think PhD good so PhD good''
''you dumb, me smart''
Because if you were to judge a doctor as a commoner then you would be judging your betters.
why
Why?
they can make mistakes
Yes.
But that's not judgment.
that's the reason I judge them
That's not judgment.
You should criticize.
Rather than saying, "You're wrong." You should just ask why they are correct.
And if they explain it, still being wrong, ask another question until they are unable to reply.
I didn't say that I assume they're wrong, I said I judge them because they can be wrong
Vex and his crew are raiding another server now
What pathetic creatures
They might be the only lifeforms lower than Irma
They didn't seem very sophisticated.
Heres the thing, i trust an expert on their field but actually less on general topics
That person studied something AT THE EXCLUSION of everything else for x number of years
I quoted Chesterson on that exact sentiment in this server not too long ago.
Naturally they will have missed a lot in doing so
"The trouble with the expert is never that he is not a man; it is always that wherever he is not an expert he is too much of an ordinary man. Wherever he is not exceptionally learned he is quite casually ignorant. This is the great fallacy in the case of what is called the impartiality of men of science. If scientific men had no idea beyond their scientific work it might be all very well — that is to say, all very well for everybody except them. But the truth is that, beyond their scientific ideas, they have not the absence of ideas but the presence of the most vulgar and sentimental ideas that happen to be common to their social clique. If a biologist had no views on art and morals it might be all very well. The truth is that the biologist has all the wrong views of art and morals that happen to be going about in the smart set of his time."
Yep, smart man.
Have you read Chesterson?
I've only gotten to Orthodoxy and William Blake.
Who is Chesterson
A Catholic novelist and author.
Ive been on a cs lewis kick for the last year or two but i just bought a complete set of his about a month ago
Was a part of a spiritual revival in the early 20th century.
Of chestersons, been meaning to get to it
Generally I'm not interested in whatever Chesterson writes about but he always articulates everything so that it's interesting anyways.
Like William Blake is a quasi-biography of William Blake, but he tangents in every direction.
what's his full name
G.K. Chesterton.
Real cutie.
Oh I know of him
was planning on reading The Innocence of Father Brown soon
/whenever I felt like it
I've steered clear of Father Brown.
But maybe it'll surprise me.
hahhahahahah she quotes Chesterton but hasn't read *The Man Who Was Thursday*
You are such a fucking meme
That's nice Otter.
and you have no taste because you cannot explore the compendium of human ingenuity for yourself.
It probably wounds your ego to know that I don't really care much about your opinion.
Considering how much time you waste with me.
I just want to make sure everyone understands you are a con-artist.
Hahaha you quote Chesterton but have you read *frantically Googles an important book of his* this book? You are the most pathetic pedantic preening pseudointellectual I have ever met in my life and I intend to spend minimal effort indulging your turboautism.
I do not believe that is Chesterton's most famous work, but it is his *best*.
Tbh
89,136 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 127/357
| Next