you do not ask your opponent to find your sources in a debate

he just did @Perpetual Moral Imbalance wat r u gonna do about it?

call his mom gay

a lot of this seems to go to communist press 🤔

theres only 1 way he can come back from that one

and also say his opinion is invalid if he cannot cite sources

If he cannot provide sources then his statements become invalid.

jeez Louise it's almost as if cross-sourcing for the attempt to disguise a legitimacy is at hand here

@Perpetual Moral Imbalance Firstly, this isn't exactly a formal debate, and it's clear that the opposition doesn't know the first thing about "debate etiquette". Secondly, I've provided articles in defense of my position on a particular topic, and there are sources contained within said articles. When you're capable of doing things on your own without someone holding your little baby hand, then feel free to take a look at them.

scipio is correct

🅱erhaps

ok then it’s not challenging to point out the sources of those articles since clearly they’re nowhere to be sern

Fuck muslims

those "sources" only do so much as link to other opinion pieces lmao

see

based

seen

fuck

Hello my friends

@Adoring Fan What isn't an opinion piece? The opinions of someone that agrees with you and reinforces your cognitive biases?

**Facts**

an opinion piece is an article with no factual source to support it

@Scipio Facts? Like Robert Conquest "facts"?

guys dont be so hard im looking through this pdf

it should have some sources

an opinion piece is me writing "the holocaust didn't happen because it couldn't possibly have". Evidence-based article would point to the fact that no document was signed to kill all jews. Unlike that, collectivization was a signed and legal program

Or the actual facts of someone that actually has a background in Sovietology and has personally worked with the source material contained within the Soviet Archives?

>sovietology

woke

appeal to authority

**Quick fact: Did you know concentration camps were first created and used by the British Empire in their war with the Zulus?**

talk about debate etiquette

@Adoring Fan Way to use that out of context, spergmaster.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kremlinology

ok

sovietology is a real term

wtf

I'm a fascologist

actual autism

@Mitch Yes, it's very much a field of academic inquiry.

and a natsocologist

a traditionologist

and a paganologist

@Adoring Fan Sounds fake and gay tbh.

baste

anyone know good free pdf programs

syndicalism is the scourge of man, we must support Douglas MacCaesar to save us all

@Deleted User it's straighter than the pole your mother dances on

that let me copy and paste

cause this is really fucking annoying

@Mitch just screencap it

@Adoring Fan Ouch. What does your sistermom do for a living?

yeah but that requires me to type stuff

kek

to look it up

>screencapping requires typing

🤔

im gonna have to google it

unless one of you guys wanna

printscreen, MS paint, crop, copy, paste

dab

@Mitch download sharex

it's on steam if you have it

i have sharex

Still wondering how the assumption that collectivization was genocide makes sense when the most heavily affected regions were those with lots of Russia dispora while Galica full of just Ukranians was less affected 🤔

LMAO

it took him this long to come up with that

homer-level autism

Finally, the mong returns to the table.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzkWyhzwO1Q

Why would Stalin target Russians instead of Ukranians in Gallica if his aim was to crush Ukranian seperatism.

nobody is implying stalin didnt target ukrainians

he did both

He targetted loyal Russians to what gain wtf

that's like saying why would a mass murderer target hooker #265 instead of hooker #484

brb

But Stalin wasnt massmurdering he was being very calculated about his actions. So was Gallica an oversight for him?

commies are calculated? excuse me?

Who said massmurder cannot involve calculation?

Or organisation?

i mean he killed over 3x hitler, sounds like mass killing to me

🤷

Ikr

@Perpetual Moral Imbalance Did he really? What's the number today? 80 gorillion?

^

yet the holocaust happened

^

Fascists and cold war propaganda inflate the numbers

Tomorrow it'll be 60 gorillion.

just like the soviets built a chimney in auschwitz in 1947?

Seriously hitler was also reoonsible for 12 million death camp kills and the 20 milluon deaths they caused by a war they instigated so like 32 million dead?

back

20 million Soviet casualties.

Caused by human wave tactics

If you had armed your men properly, maybe they wouldn't of died so quickly.

HM?

i thought the official death number was 11 million 🤔

@Scipio that is a ww2 lie lol

all assuming that the holocaust happened and the soviets did kill many people, it’s somewhere around 20(?) million for stalin, which is just higher than 3x hitler’s 6 million

How can soviets use human wave