general
Discord ID: 450389123081961476
86,771 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 110/868
| Next
Weโre the only party in favor of recreational nuclear weapons
fascism would include partly monarchism also
but is fascism hereditary
it can be
Do you not no me @Perpetual Moral Imbalance
but does fascism have feudal vassals
๐
it can have
lel
but is everybody who isn't a vassal a peasant
I ran for party leader
i'm pretty much for monarchies and feudalism too
but
you wont find that with the conservative party
yes i know
because i don't actually want feudalism
but feudalism is still interesting all the same
I do, read evola n3rd
Conservatives = Colonial period Liberals.
yes
so conservatives = anti-feudalism
yes
i don't actually want feudalism [2]
Ik but still.
do you want monarchism though?
I wouldn't
because for that our party can accommodate better
nigga you have a crown pfp lmao
True๐
monarchical national socialism when
No no joinLibertarian
What is a bugman?
Libertarian is ๐๐ฟ
@Grugochet synonymous to soyboy
Where does it stem from
Soy Beans
basically a loser who takes what he hears at face value, doesn't question the narrative, lets the (((elites))) use him a pawn
just curious
why are players divided by region instead of political party
because thats how elections will be organised
it's first past the most
*post
not proportional
k
Just like real life
@Adoring Fan You're a fascist, you don't pose a threat to the )))elites)))
I mean technically the fascists have like 3x the members you do
And I say )))elites))) because they're not all Jewish you antisemitic bastard.
#notall
@๐ฆ ๐๐ช๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ ๐๐๐ฎ ๐ฆ The fascists may have 3x the members but all they can do is play with eachothers members. They aren't a threat to the establishment.
fascists + libertarians + conservatives
some great numbers we got there
1111
yeah communism isnt a threat to the establishment either
it is the establishment
If they ever gain serious power, it will be as a result of them getting into bed with big business.
They'll be enriching (((their))) pockets.
yeah because US bankers didnt fund the communist revolution lmao
Do you realize how absurd that sounds? Why would the financial elite fund a revolution led by people whose interests are antithetical to their own?
International Barnsdall
look them up
Wtf is that? That's not even a thing.
that's how the commies got their funding
or did you think it was all pitchforks and knives
Are you referring to the barnsdall oil company?
International Barnsdall Corporation. It funded the communists even though trading with russia was prohibited at the time
You do realize that the Soviet government propositioned them on a contractual basis to oversee an oil field in Baku, right? And that was in 1922.
This was after Lenin implemented the NEP.
They didn't "fund the revolution" lol.
Your historiography is crappier than the shit I took last night.
o damn get rekt like a sausage
Jacob Schiff? hello?
funding is not merely direct. The communists knew they could not have sustained themselves without foreign (jewish) intervention.
Once again, it was not merely pitchforks and knives
Alexander Parvus also was a heavy contributor. He wasn't exactly part of the proletariat.
Olof Aschberg funded the Soviets and aided them in their banking industry from Sweden shortly after the revolution.
to suggest that the Soviet Union was without outside elite interference is a completely ludicrous statement
oh an yes Schiff was obviously a Jew. As was Parvus, and Aschberg
to not so much as bat an eye to the fact that they bankrolled the revolution, because a company sent aid after it is laughable at best. Your analogies to feces only have effect on nigger twitter. I understand you have a mind more perverted than any Jewish porn mogul, but it doesn't mean you have to ignore basic truths.
How much did Parvus write a check for? Because iirc, he was a Marxist revolutionary with a background in political economy, and at one point was close friends with Lenin. They admired eachothers writings, and Parvus was also close with Rosa Luxemburg and the German Social Democrats. He was a well-known anti-Tsarist and also attempted to stir up rebellion against the banks.
Was he an able financial advisor? Sure. But how much did "fund the revolution" with?
yeah financial advisor, but funneling german money to the bolsheviks
Copenhagen operation
And how is it a problem that Olof Aschberg helped to create the first Soviet banking institution, which was and still is in its current Russian incarnation- publicly owned?
the same antics as Parvus
The guy had communist sympathies and he helped to bankroll the Popular Front as well.
If he was really one of (((them))) then he wouldn't have been to the far left of the political spectrum.
yes i am not exactly doubting that any of these men had communist sympathies
are you serious? Lenin and Trotsky were Jewish, as was the majority of the Soviet government, as well as Papa Marx himself.
Being jewish does not preclude you from being a communist
Lenin was partially Jewish, and there's good reason to believe that he wasn't even aware of it. His mother was half Jewish.
He had absolutely no connection to Jewish culture or the Jewish community.
being aware of your jewishness has no bearing on the matter
a jew is a jew is a jew
additionally, way to deflect from the other points
No, that simply isn't true. One isn't somehow a capitalist overlord due to the fact that they have Jewish ancestry.
I never stated one has to be a capitalist overlord due to them being jewish
I never claimed capitalism was the only problem, neither did I say that jews only use capitalism to their benefit as a tool
the CPUSA was majority jewish
I also didn't deflect, you seem to believe that leftists with the means and ability to provide material and/or intellectual support to a communist revolution are somehow part of some elite, Jewish controlled conspiracy.
86,771 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 110/868
| Next