NOOOOOOOOOOO

YOU'RE IN A BATTLEGROUND (R) DISTRICT

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

KICK HIM

lmaoooo

wut

HE'S GOING TO COST US THE MIDTERMS

We can flip his vote.

can we

Many Bernie supporters voted for Trump.

can't tell if you're being serious or not, Culberson isn't unpopular and served in the district for quite some time now

TX-7 is one of the Clinton Suburban districts!!!

But again, I follow the Senate more than the House so

If it comes down to one vote and you vote D I'm gonna kill myself lmao

I gotta leave, but don't kick Snickers out unless he crosses the line. Maybe we'll be able to get his vote.

Depends who the D is in the district.

See, he can be swung.

ehh, swung as in swung not to vote

Still, that's one less vote for our opponents.

lmao you guys are acting like Im some kind of a special person and can't hear you guys. "He can be persuaded" "He can become one of us"

Well, you can probably atleast be persuaded to not vote.

YOUR DISTRICT HANGS IN THE BALANCE

alright, let's de-escalate this for a moment

How is it a battleground district? Most of the people in the district are rich urbanites living in the River Oaks areas. Most of them are apathetic or vote Republican

Here's my (hopefully) definitive list of senate candidates for us to go for:
AZ-Martha McSally
FL-Rick Scott*
IN-Todd Rokita
MA-V.A. Shiva
ME-Paul LePage*
MI-John James
MO-Josh Hawley
MN-Robert Barnheiser
MN(sp)-Karin Housley
MT-Matt Rosendale
ND-Kevin Cramer
NJ-Thomas Kean Jr*
OH-Jim Renacci
PA-Lou Barletta
TN-Marsha Blackburn
VA-Corey Stewart
WI-Kevin Nicholson
WV-Evan Jenkins
(* represents a potential candidate) (As of 2/15/2018)

Clinton won there

it's not _the_ most vulnerable district, but still

I see. But there are special districts where Trump won by a huge margin and the Dems won this year

Also according to ballotpedia it's not even considered a battleground

i'm the data guru

and i say its vulnerable

tell me,

as a lefty, what is your endgame

what is your ideal America

endgame lmao

A raceless, mocha-colored averaged population?

globalism and open borders and mutliculturalism obviously

nah

haha

I KNEW IT

lmao its a joke

^

you think you're clever, arentcha

I know of your globalist dream of a pacified world wide serfdom, dependent upon government, substances, and subsistence labor to barely survive, too weak to challenge the globalist police state hegemony.

Really its just what progressives want. No more wars abroad, stronger economy, healthy society where people actually have access to free college, medicare, etc.

lmao a police state is the last thing I want or any progressive wants for that matter

@Snickers Ueah everyone wants free shit wether they are a Regression or not. The problem is that you can't get there without making society in general poorer. That is why Liberals are all retarded

How is free college, expanded medicaid, better infrastructure, etc. going to make society poorer?

>inb4 tax money

Oh fuck off! I didn't say infrastructure and Medicaid would make society poorer

fine. how is free college and expanded medicare going to make society poorer?

Because everyone else has to Pay for your free shit! I already paid for my degree so why should I have to pay for yours? Why don't you fix the reason why college is so expensive? Seriously why the fuck are you even here.

I knew you would say that

Believe it or not, tax dollars aren't used for government expenditures, especially for the United States since we are monetary sovereign

Taxes are used for other reasons such as regulating aggregate demand, but not for investing in public goods and services

We can essentially have "free college" since the federal government is going to check the college, and that money will be used to invest in the college infrastructure, college professors, etc. etc.

But our politicians keep on peddling the neoliberal bullshit that we are somehow limited on the amount of money we can have and we will somehow go bankrupt even though that hasn't been the case ever since we got off the gold standard.

http://neweconomicperspectives.org/2014/05/taxes-mmt-approach.html

Also, I never understood why conservatives aren't behind free college. The reason why most millenials have to delay major life decisions like getting married, buying a house, starting a nuclear family, etc. is because of the private debt they have to pay back from college, even those who are in STEM and business majors

you don't have to go college

You're right, but these are for people who actually worked their ass off to get into the college they want, only to either not go to college or have to go to a shittier one because they can't pay off the massive tuition fee that comes with it.

I'm for more opportunities when it comes to trade school though

well they should've thought about if they could pay for it beforehand

it's their fault

k

"Believe it or not, tax dollars aren't used for government expenditures, especially for the United States since we are monetary sovereign
Taxes are used for other reasons such as regulating aggregate demand, but not for investing in public goods and services" @Snickers what

https://mobile.twitter.com/MittRomney/status/964489491682504704

Hopefully Utah Rs block him

"Mark my words. If Republican majorities in Congress pass citizenship for millions of people and amnesty, I think it’s quite likely we will lose both houses of Congress and Speaker Nancy Pelosi will impeach President Trump," Sen. Cruz (TX) warns

Indeed.

@everyone https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/160726494

@Ḁ̢̧̡̝̭̀̓̇̈̑yeExEye̼̘̲ͨͬ Thanks

the thing is, it's not prime American hours right now

it's still Europoor time for /pol/

wtf

delete that,

so....Mueller is indicting Russians because they made social media?

I want to give a quick rundwon

sure

i've analyzed this situation, okay

It appears that Russians forces worked with unwitting members of both Pro-Trump and Anti-Trump organizations in an attempt to sow chaos in the American political scene

the bit at the very end of Mueller's indictment letter stating that Trump staffers were “unwitting” suggests he will end up clearing the campaign itself on anything related to collusion/conspiracy

AG Deputy Rosenstein pretty much sums this up in his own statement:

There is no allegation in the indictment that any American was a knowing participant in the alleged unlawful activity. There is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election.

Also, to answer your own question, yes,

because foreign nationals posing as Americans is a violation of US campaign laws

look at this btw, this is worth shilling:

I'm sure there were tons of foreign nationals shiling for Hill while posing as Americans

Russian forces worked with both two Democrat and Republican groups on the same _day_

they were,

yeah, and I'm sure it wasn't just Russians as well

one of them being the "Not my president" movement

I'm sure there are quite a few Britbongs, cucked Krauts, sissy Swedes, etc who posed as Americans

I'm sure there are quite a few leafs who did that

as well as many other nationalities

there is some truth behind the British part

this Russia thing is so fucking retarded

if you recall,

the Nunes memo indicates that British forces met with Manafort