midterms-discussions
Discord ID: 399676530394923010
112,096 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 33/1121
| Next
This is amazing news
If the monmouth poll is the way 2018 goes, that's what, 240 in the House?
Easily a big rightward swing in the Senate
One thing I noticed about the tax plan in particular is that current support is tied at 44% A and 44% D
I hope the trend continues
Most people are saving on the tax plan according to MaximLotts
When they file in April, many people may get hit with the surprise
imagine how much butthurt we can witness from the left over the course of the next few months if the GOP is maintaining a constant lead in the polls
The media shilling falls to the wayside
What's funny is that they'll start saying polls are BS
come 2020, if the polls show Trump in a comfortable lead, they'll be crowing on about how it will be an upset like 2016, except for their side
Tax plan support is only going to get better as the year continues, I was surprised that it was a tie.
This shows it's only in the middle in growth of support, which will be in favor of the Rs
That Monmouth poll also covers 3 days.
Jan 28 - 30
Meaning that we can assume most people called were called BEFORE, not AFTER Trump's monumentally successful SOTU speech
In the next few days, I wouldn't be surprised if we see a poll which shows Rs having higher polling in the generic ballot than Dems.
Pop the champagne
The retirements are still problematic
Yeah, Gowdy's a great asset, it's a shame
But I think overall we're heading in a good direction if we can channel this energy
Ye, things are looking better than worse now
What makeup would a D+2 election have on the House?
GOP retains or even gains seats
truly astonishing
Trump's average approval rating is also higher than its been since June 30th, 2017
if things stay the same we can expect: R 231; D 204
53%, huh?
That's at D+5.6, right?
that's at 5.9, so we could expect 2-3 seats more
GOP could gain seats if it was D+2 ?
yes
districting
i have to admit, i didn't expect the GOP to get within the 5 range,
so +2 is very well a possibility now
We've got to remain with this positive messaging and perceived bipartisanship and allowing the dems to blunder and collapse under the progressive hysteria and then we'd have our red storm on lock.
Trump should do more live speeches in general.
Miller definitely has a strong hand, he should be very hard at work.
I think the tax bill will be a sign of great continued growth with the Rs, at least until April-May.
Tax season will have a lot of pleasant surprises.
it should,
right now it's only tied in support and there are still a lot of people who still have the media's leftist dogma ringing through their heads from last year
the GOP will have to pursue some other major, landmark legislation to be safe
44% A, 44% D, and according to Monmouth, " the number who believe that their taxes will go up (36%) outnumber those who believe that their taxes will go down (24%) or stay the same (32%) under the new system."
People who say their taxes will go up still have a plurality.
We've all seen the tax analyses where people see how their taxes are, and I swear, 90+% of the time, they go down.
When they check their taxes this season, the surprise will bring major growth to support to the bill as the undeniable effects become apparent to all taxpayers.
@๐Boo-ton๐ They certainly should, but what legislation would fit the bill (pardon the pun)
What would be the effects on the Senate with the Dems at +2?
I know it's much more individual, but there's got to be an estimate, right?
D+2.9: 54-48 (+)
D+5.9: 53-47
D+7.9: 52-48
D+9.9: 51-49
D+12.9: 50-50
pretty much this
How do you do the math on that
by taking the 2016 house seat elections and shifting each election result by the average generic ballot (right now at 5.6)
I compile the data on excel to get the results and changes of each districts instantly,
a +5.6 democratic shift would only flip less than 10 districts, fortunately
53 seats in the senate would do some good
what are the results if the margin is R+2, R+5, R+10
I think that number is higher tbh if we look at it individually but it's good to know
We get substantial increases
gain, no change, loss (house flipped for Dems)
oh wait,
R
I see you put R, mb
We get /redstorm/
assuming that occurs...
let's see...
is the analysis coming in
new thread
R+2.9: R 241, D 194
R+5.9: R 247, D 188
R+7.9: R 254, D 181
R+9.9: R 276, D 159
Yeah that's what we want but I'd certainly be content w/ D+6 or below
ya, that's the most realistic approach
NYCanon, I think you might want to space out the posts throughout the thread instead of blowing everything at the start
it's a better rhythm I feel
people like more of the discussion and not just a ton of hard data and text to look through
maybe if an anon asks "I'm in X state, what should I do" then you drop the analysis on their specific state on them
no one really wants to scroll past all of the 50 state analysis to get to the meat of the thread, it's unpalatable especially to the average person on /pol/ who bumps blacked threads like a retard
hmm
sure
I figure that having a lot of content at the start can inspire people to respond to any one of the posts
one of the dangers of starting with only a couple posts is that people will look at the thread, see that there are only 2 posts, and don't feel compelled to post
which leads to it dying right from the start
it's like salt
OP's can't bump
too much spoils the whole meal
so I figure I'd copy and paste a lot of posts
I'll bump it
so that there's a greater chance of someone responding
thanks
hmm
let's have an artificial discussion in the thread
make a post about Florida
and I'll respond to it
lot of productive discussion going on in the general thankfully
Indeed
@๐Boo-ton๐ Those are good stats for the House with positive R margins, but what about the Senate
also beyond a certain point, Republican majorities in the House won't mean much
a majority is still a majority
I'm not sure if generic ballot is the way to go when it comes to the senate, individual races are much more important
not much of a real difference between 260 Republicans and 300 Republicans in the House
At R+12.9, Republicans could get 59 seats
112,096 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 33/1121
| Next