It uses unscientific sources as source

"2000 to Now – Toxic Chemical Medicine to treat Toxic Food Disorder
Chemotherapy, surgery and radiation treatments are pushed harder than ever for every third American who develops cancer cells from processed food, genetically modified vaccines, and carcinogenic prescription medications. Diabetes is in full swing thanks to HFCS and fast food meat. Dementia rates are higher than ever, killing humans right and left, as sodium fluoride in U.S. tap water, mercury in flu shots, and glyphosate sprayed on nearly all conventional (GMO) crops all take their toll on the human brain."#

Now, they hide some right things within the wrong claims

This is why it is so hard to distinguish what is right and what is wrong

It is true that processed meats, especially red meats can cause cancer

Because of the salts they use to make it last longer

Those salts, I don't know what salts it were exactly, lets the DNA in your cells of your intestinal system mutate

If this happens in a proto-onco-gene and a tumorsupressor gene it creates cancer

Now, Chemotherapy radiation therapy and surgery are our only thing to fight against cancer now

We do have very new and modern radiation therap methods, those are very expensive tho

Because of the expensice equippment used

https://www.fresenius.com/using-protons-to-take-on-cancer

The new Quirónsalud proton beam therapy center, which is being built in Madrid, will require an investment of about €40 million

Thats why not everry hospital can afford it now, but they will at some point

MRI and CTs were also that expensive now

Now it is true that glyphosat is hella bad

Nothing against that

But there is no study saying gmo's are bad for us

At least no cause and effect studies that have at least two branches

Which is needed for a scientific claim

Now, I am very well read about the pathology of alzheimers

I don't know if you are @Wretch . If you want I am willing to explain the pathology of alzheimers, the genetics behind it and everything you need to know to see, that this bald claim is not true

I think on europe they are actually connecting aluminum to Alzheimer's. Not from vaccine but from antiperspirant and non stick pans mainly. They have banned antiperspirant sales in Germany. Still thats just kind of side note not really worthy od conversation

Yes, aluminum in its metal form

But the connection to alzheimers is doubtfull

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-06-24-big-tech-fascism-mailchimp-shuts-down-greenmedinfo-newsletter.html

@ZeroT i call bull shit on your writing a scientific paper on it

Big shocker! Mailchimp is a “CDC Foundation partner,” which means it’s just another pro-vaccine front corporation
Why would Mailchimp bother to get involved in trying to regulate what types of newsletter content it sends out for its clients, you might be asking? Well, as it turns out, Mailchimp is a CDC Foundation “partner,” which means it’s directly tied to the corrupt, vaccine-pushing Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. So, naturally, any newsletter content that defies the decrees of the CDC is now in “violation” of Mailchimp’s “Terms of Use.”

@ZeroT push your crap somewhere else SHILL

Now

You did again just use that source that is nowhere near being scientific

Do you know what alzheimers is and how it happens?

https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-02-16-cdc-is-a-vaccine-company-owns-56-vaccines-sells-4-1b-of-vaccines-a-year.html

you trust ppl that have a conflict of interest

peroid

so your sources are tainted

not trustable

WTF

Do you know how scientific work works?

yea do you

Like I am just trying to be nice to you and you just insult me

http://humansarefree.com/2019/04/science-pioneer-99-of-modern-scientific.html

Like, I wanted to explain alzheimers to you

“People just don’t do it,” Wharton School professor and forecasting expert J. Scott Armstrong told Brietbart.com after making the shocking claim that less that one percent of papers published in scientific journals follow the scientific method.

doubt you even know waht scientific method is

“What’s happening now is, government research, universities — they’re asking for what I call advocacy research. They have something, they want you to prove it, make sure you prove it, [and when] you do, you keep getting paid,” he said in a separate article on Breitbart.com.

“Advocacy research is the bulk of these 99 percent of non-scientific studies and they’re not done for scientific development, they’re done to support a political idea. If you want to make money in universities these days, you publish papers that support global warming and you live handsomely.”

hmmm sound familiar

“[Scientists] cheat. If you don’t get statistically significant results, then you throw out variables, add variables, [and] eventually you get what you want,” he concluded.

so lets get this straight over 99% of so called scientific papers introduced in scientific journals are nothing but pseudoscience to push a agenda

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-06-18-vaccine-excipient-summary-exposes-toxic-ingredients-vaccines.html

J. Scott Armstrong (born March 26, 1937) is an author, forecasting and marketing expert,[1][2][3] and a professor of Marketing at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. He also serves as a Policy Expert at the Heartland Institute, a conservative and libertarian public policy think tank

Ohhh

So this dude has the expertise to tell you how science works

A dude that eaches marketing

Interesting

hahaha you are missing the point

Now

Infkuenza vaccines are not mandatory childhood vaccines

https://www.naturalnews.com/052317_climate_change_scientific_consensus_fraudulent_science_survey.html

So claiming they still use mercury in childhood vaccines but they use it in influenza vaccine sonly makes no sense

so lets get this straight it was 75 scientist that made up the 97%

not is it not it is in the flu vaccines too

and others

the article i posted shows how the manipulate the numbers too

they do this in all fields

not just climate change

Okay then

http://humansarefree.com/2016/09/over-30000-scientists-declare-climate.html

i think 30000 is way more than 75

but the media pushes the 75s ideas not the 30000

why?????

it is called propaganda and this is how they push it

Because you use false information of non scientific sources

But whatever

Belive what you want

it is not a belief

i got proof you just ignore it

You don't have any proofs

You use

Unscientific sources

But you don't understand that

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-03-06-genetic-sequencing-science-breakthrough-just-proved-that-measles-outbreaks-are-caused-by-the-measles-vaccine.html prooof

Because it is easier to deny climate change than to do something agianst it

YOU ARE ONLY USING NATURAL NEWS AND HUMANS ARE FREE

Those websites

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Au9hw8vKfpk&feature=em-lsp

Are 0%scientific

http://humansarefree.com/2019/06/gvt-report-160-million-paid-so-far-in.html

@ZeroT https://jcm.asm.org/content/55/3/735 where you think natural news got it

not very bright are you

he lists the sources in his articles

http://humansarefree.com/2019/04/zero-us-measles-deaths-in-10-years-but.html

proof the vaccine is more deadly than the actual disease

Wow

YOU KEEP BELIEVING IS MORE LIKE IT

I am just not talking to you anymore

Like

bye

your not worth talking to

I AM 100% sure you are not able to understand that whole study