ALL combined

temperature, pressure, mass, density (and buoyancy).
and electromagnetism

But I can manipulate electromagnetism, right?

I give you all of those

so how does temperature keep us on the ground. Please explain the role it plays

Well, temperature changes density and buoyancy thus making a difference

is pretty much what i was gonna say

ok makes sense

and -- it can turn things from solids to liquids too, and vice-versa
and gases etc yes

And to gasses

true

what about mass

dude, think things out for yourself, there, would ya

going in friggn circles

its not the normal model im used to

i dont giva flying FK aobut Grabbity, ..the earth is FLAT

Is electromagnetism the reason things tend to denser mediums?

If it is, and I can isolate it out in a faraday cage, I can remove the downward pull

wtfrig is wrong with you : (

did u not see this...
Ya wanna know the Test i want you to Perform, while you're in your "Faraday Cage"?! 🤔 ..
--i want u to bring a Balloon in there with you, ..and...Rub It against your pants, ..then ..pur it to your Hair or something, and see if there's static-charge//static-electricity etc

Mike, you saying that you don't give a FK about grabbity, the earth is flat is like someone saying I don't know, god did it

omg

fkn hewmans ..im so sick of them ughhh

i DO knowwwwwwwwww

and

i TOLD ouy uuuuuuuuu TEN FKN TIMES what "Grabbity" issssssssssss

and

I DontCARE ABOUT IT, technically! ok!!! bc IT DOESNT DETERMINEEEE the shapeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee OF THE EARTH

the earth is FKMN FLATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT

fh.g ;,des['n.h

stop making me repeat shit

But that proves electromagnetism has nothing to do with why things fall

gmf nodksznhogrf

ELECTROMAGNETISM is only ONE PART of>> MANY (multiple)

and

you do not KNOW you can "isolate" ALL Electromagnetism" out of cage
have i not said that 18 FKN TIMES?!

@✧Mike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)✧ If I can isolate some of it, things would behave differently in that cage, fall at different rate then outside of it

smh
my advice? >> go look for "Earth curvature" INSTEAD, m'kayyy....

you're wasting your time on stupid parts of the topic

That is a key part

smacking my fn head

i think we are more interested in understanding your model because weve already wasted alot of time for a global earth but we wanna hear both sides

NO CURVE meanssssssss FLAT

UNDERstand

yes that makes sense

FIRST AND FOREMOST >> NO CURVE

derppppppppppp

ok why?

There is no reason for the earth beeing flat. The shape things take is spherical

LIGHTS in the sky seem to take a spheical shape, huh!

i believe it could be flat but you have to support the claim and say why its flat

NOT MY FLOOR tho

Because your floor wasn't formed on it's own

@the21cat NOTHING i "say" will make you believe its flat

those are contradicting but it could point either way

@viherkasvi -- i know it wasnt (formed on its own), it was CREATED that way

smfhhh

@✧Mike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)✧ Yes, was earth created?

if I can comprehend your model it well

but i see numerous problems

its too uncertain

Light and FLOOR ...
http://prntscr.com/hnnmrh

yeah,, hmm..gee,,,, ...im in my KITCHEN right now, .. and..gee..the LIGHTBULBS (in my CEILING) look SORT OF LIKE a possible "Ball"? ..but??...

what the heck? HOW can my (kitchen) FLOOR be FLAT ? ____🤔

not the reasoning for a global earth that people are suggesting. Most anyway

🔭 <:lul:484994724118134784>
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/559905290175381504/561406220485918720/FlatEarthLookItsAGlobe.jpg

Density seeking medium makes spherical shapes, dense in the middle, less dense outwards evenly. That dictates the shape of the earth

using stars to say the earth is a globe is in my opinion about the same logic

just because other things are circular wouldn't make earth circular thats the problem

Mass attracting mass makes spheres

If not manipulated

The attraction is equal to every direction

yes but we arent under that consensus for whatever reason. Even though gravity due to mass was proved with like 700 pound dense masses on earth in an experiment in like the 16th century we are still not in that consensus

Consensus about what?

gravity being real and mass being attracted to mass

But people who think otherwise deny reality

any astronomy used to prove mass attracts mass is flawed but here on earth we can actually isolate the variables

Mass attracts mass

its not so much

Gravity is not proven I think

It's a force that we call gravity

It was with like 300 kg masses and torque

it affected the acceleration of other masses

Yes

Hard to measure 'cos it's so weak as a force

yeah thats why we need like 300 kg masses to get any not negligable effect

thats almost 700 lbs by the way

and dense too

Im from Finland, we use kilos

because distance is also a factor

oh i see

so your country uses the better system

Yeah

minus Joules in my opinion but other than that yeah

But system with twelves instead of tens seems logical

Easier to divide

true

but not with 5280

thats when it just becomes a pain

Can't do that now 😂

Easy in the kitchen let's say