that's a very terrible analogy kev

someone saying something doesn't change what it actually is

what, its just an ingredient, a poisonous nut

Exactly kev, which is why we linked the studies that disprove the crackpot theory of the gay bean

being scared that a bean might make you a woman is irrational

some ingredients can kill you, its not irrational to realize that the food you eat can affect you in a variety of ways

well you seem to be rather scared about jt

Ok. What about dozens of scientific studies with hundreds of people, all saying it’s fine, or ONE guy who had way too much of it and had some issues? Which one do you trust more?

"avoid soy if your a man and don't wanna become a female"

ugh i have way too much of red meat im getting cancer too

I'm not agreeing with that statement, I'm just repeating it to point out it was said by someone else

That's what you said just before

doesn't mean you're getting cancer by having red meat in proper quantities

We have disproven the affect by showing studies

you have shown that people can be bought to create fake studies, nothing more

Kev, pretty sure you haven't read their studies, and your own study shows internal contradictions

like the cigarette companies did for smoking for many many decades

maybe you should review the history of what the cigarette companies did

those were sponsored studies

pretty sure these are independently written

You didn't even read the full article that you sent yourself

exactly

I don't care if it ends by trying to mitigate its potential libel if soy companies sue them

the facts are the facts,

they don't change by fake studies

Bruh all these conservatives scared shitless of a bean and the liberals are the irrational ones

And the facts show that soy is not harmful in regulated quantities.

Saying the studies are fake doesn’t make it so.

you mean the soy boys who are eating the soy like its the next TG answer to paradise?

?

liberals are the irrational ones

No, I mean the meta-study listed earlier, encompassing 32 scientific investigations, showing no harmful effects of soy in regulated quantities.

32 studies

^

http://www.urdoca.com/2016/07/england-man-grows-breasts-after.html

Good discussions

You know what’s really, really strange?

You

Gottem 😂 😂

These are two separate cases, right? So how did both people (the guy in Texas and the guy in London) both give the interviewer this phrase: “My penis—I won’t say it atrophied, but it was so flaccid that it looked very small in comparison with the way it used to be.”

The exact same one?

maybe its 2 BS articles

Exactly the same

One of them is bs.

I didn't make up the term soy boy

some other people did

Ik

pretty much indicates that being on soy feminizes men

...no

There was one case where this guy drank three quarts a day and he got a hormone disorder.

https://knowyourmeme.com/photos/1350057-soy-boy

Balanced by 32 different studies of hundreds of people that showed that soy is fine, if you don’t take too much of it.

Oh yeah now KnowYourMeme is evidence?

I did a reverse image search on the guy in the article

appearantly its a powerful tool in evidential circles

equal to your 32 studies

Waow

*fake studies paid for by soy shills promoting soy to feminize men in an evil conspiracy

Oh yeah sure just call them all fake

Couldn't find any coverage in the daily mail or the sun only the same article posted again and again word for word on different natural health websites

No, you’re just in denial.

Calling them fake does not make them fake.

wait, you think $4 billion dollar company is a powerful company. pfff ahahahaahah

lets take a walk down memory lane

what did the cigarette company do when studies came out that it wasn't healthy to smoke?

Same thing the oil companies are doing about climate change

<:smart:484956754489376781>

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2005/jun/02/thisweekssciencequestions.cancer

In 1951, the researchers wrote to 59,600 doctors and asked about their smoking habits. They kept a watch on the doctors' health and published the results in 1954 in a paper now deemed so important that the British Medical Journal reprinted the first page last June, 50 years after the original report.

so lets see, they figured this out in the 1970's but yet people were still smoking

wow, seems like once a company makes a lot of money selling something, they work to protect that cash cow and stiffle facts that say its unhealthy

you guys wait 50 years until they finally admit that its feminizing, I will act on the correct info now

you think a company worth $4 billion is a big company?

I think its a decent sized company, not necessarily "big"

its pretty small

I think it has backers who promote feminizing men, who have trillions

its matching a globalist agenda

anyway, most soy is used as animal feed, very little is actually consumed by people directly

I'm not buying that, your not only getting 1st hand exposure, but 2nd hand exposure as well

drinking milk that a cow who did SOY (gag)

so you advoid basically all meat then

and milk products

cheese, milk

All milk?

and dairy product

basically you have to be vegan

unless I can find a farm that doesn't soy

you don't eat meat @^Kevin^?

You're vegan?

I use to

I'm going to become a hermit

damn kev you didn't seem the vegan type lol

Soy is a verb now?

Sounds pretty feminine

Lol

to soy or not to soy, one of the things a male should never ask

The beans already got you <:ohheck:485078351162376202>

sorry, I'm all male here