Popular mechanics is owned by the Hearst family. They may have a vested interest in debunking. Not the best source.

I will proceed to find more sources then.

Is there another source?

There are

But they're mostly from "debunk" articles, or conspiracy sites

"The maximum flame temperature increase for burning hydrocarbons (jet fuel) in air is, thus, about 1,000°C—hardly sufficient to melt steel at 1,500°C. "

https://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/jom/0112/eagar/eagar-0112.html

🤔

That converts out to 1,800°F, roughly, not factoring in burning desks, rugs, and wood furnishings

I’ve always understood that the twin towers would have explanations. Whether true or not, they are hard to disprove. However, building 7 is not. Especially since a reporter was announcing the collapse of building 7 before it had happened.

Unlike you...I was old enough to remember this.

Are we sidetracking again, or can I continue?
Hey, it's always possible that WTC 7 was brought down in a completely unrelated government plot

😂. That’s really really stretching it. I wouldn’t even know how to calculate the odds of that.

That wasn't me being serious, for the record

No. However it’s approaching condescension. I don’t appreciate it.

It was meant to be a joke

Understood

It's a reference to a webcomic I read, which I later realized you probably wouldn't read

XKCD

No. I wouldn’t actually. 😂

It's pretty nerdy

Anyways, is that citation for the burning temperature of jet fuel sufficient?

Kind of. However the twin towers were never the smoking gun. It was always building 7

Most people don't actually bring up building 7 to me

In any case, if 7 was an inside job, that would mean that the other ones also had to be taken care of from the inside

So do you wish me to not continue on the collapse of the main towers?

Because I can stop

No. It’s always been building 7. I accepted the narrative until I learned about it.

It took me 12 years to learn about building 7.

You said it was "stretching the odds" for the collapses to be unrelated

Which means, in your eyes, it's all or nothing

So if the two primary towers weren't brought down in a controlled manner, why would 7 have been?

Yes. Coincidences do happen but a series of coincidences...no

I’ll show you why. 1 sec

So I take it this means you don't want me to continue

Nope

I've always been confused, is that a "no, don't continue" or a "no, continue"?

Don’t continue. I’ve always accepted the possibility that the twin towers may have collapsed due to structural integrity loss. Maybe but maybe not.

Can’t be proven either way

Okay. You wanted me to support my claim though...

Yes. I wanted to know that your research was done first.

Ah

Have I convinced you that I did research?

I can pull out the iron-carbon phase diagram if you want. I just need to find the version *not* filled with Greek letters

Sort of. I was hoping you’d look at building 7. The experts agree with my assertion.

https://www.ae911truth.org/

Dick Cheney (Vice President) made huge money from the billions in defence contracts that were obtained in the resulting invasion of Afghanistan

Then Iraq

If building 7 was an inside job, the other two would have to have been as well. Why would I try to prove something about building 7 when I know more about 1 and 2?

Because 1 and 2 have easy explanations

7 does not

If 1 and 2 are satisfactorily explained, how is 7 a smoking gun? It's only a smoking gun if there's more evidence to point to the whole thing being an inside job.

1 and 2 were not necesssrily satisfactory. Just plausible

Okay

The twin towers are a distraction. That’s what they want.

Hey, if you don't mind, since I'm not proving that I've done research, I'm gonna go back to watching The Expanse

Because it doesn't seem like either of us will be convinced any time soon

I don’t mind. I look forward to chatting with you again. 😃

<:snapsnap:484956825863585792>

Who are the fastest readers in the world? The survivors of 9/11, bc they went 7 stories in 11 sec

@TheBeastlyGamerz Boooo !!!

This is an excellent 911 documentary.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5QlWZQMYdfA

This video contains an in-depth interview with an ex-flight attendant who has done extensive research on all key individuals relating to 911. They include those who made tragic calls to loved ones. Surprisingly every one of them has ties to corporations and individuals such as the bushes, the CIA, the Mossad, Halliburton and many more.

She has written a book titled “Methodical Illusion”.

https://youtu.be/Cm7vs-pBZoc

911 was an inside job for sure

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WP8StBjco3A

gravity works similar to magnetism

@ionic famine I can’t help it. I find your avatar just adorable. 😂

thank u

i like business and tht kind of stuff and it stood out to me

I just like purple. 😃

u take some happy pills or sunshine in a bag

Lol

***Question Of The Day #8***

Was 911 an inside job?

Share your thoughts here in the <#484514023698726912>

gwench question u like purple pills or purple kush

Can I say I’m embarrassed to say I don’t know what you’re asking? 😳

eminem song refernce and a purple weed reference

all related to ur favourite color

a

Alright, @skaffa yippa has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

Fvck this

<:MmmYea:358690697152430080>

Im outta here

Bye

get h*cked

Some partner pinged @everyone

Being pinged isnt even that bad

true

Its midnight

Yea so

I fvcking woke up

turn ur phone all the way off or disable disc notif

^

Just stop being gay

Lmao

thats a question for yourself, my dood

Its not an question