Message from @The Gwench
Discord ID: 547932632630034452
😂. That’s really really stretching it. I wouldn’t even know how to calculate the odds of that.
That wasn't me being serious, for the record
No. However it’s approaching condescension. I don’t appreciate it.
It was meant to be a joke
Understood
It's a reference to a webcomic I read, which I later realized you probably wouldn't read
XKCD
No. I wouldn’t actually. 😂
It's pretty nerdy
Anyways, is that citation for the burning temperature of jet fuel sufficient?
Kind of. However the twin towers were never the smoking gun. It was always building 7
Most people don't actually bring up building 7 to me
In any case, if 7 was an inside job, that would mean that the other ones also had to be taken care of from the inside
So do you wish me to not continue on the collapse of the main towers?
Because I can stop
No. It’s always been building 7. I accepted the narrative until I learned about it.
It took me 12 years to learn about building 7.
You said it was "stretching the odds" for the collapses to be unrelated
Which means, in your eyes, it's all or nothing
So if the two primary towers weren't brought down in a controlled manner, why would 7 have been?
I’ll show you why. 1 sec
So I take it this means you don't want me to continue
Nope
I've always been confused, is that a "no, don't continue" or a "no, continue"?
Don’t continue. I’ve always accepted the possibility that the twin towers may have collapsed due to structural integrity loss. Maybe but maybe not.
Can’t be proven either way
Okay. You wanted me to support my claim though...
Yes. I wanted to know that your research was done first.
Ah
Have I convinced you that I did research?
I can pull out the iron-carbon phase diagram if you want. I just need to find the version *not* filled with Greek letters
Sort of. I was hoping you’d look at building 7. The experts agree with my assertion.
Dick Cheney (Vice President) made huge money from the billions in defence contracts that were obtained in the resulting invasion of Afghanistan
Then Iraq
If building 7 was an inside job, the other two would have to have been as well. Why would I try to prove something about building 7 when I know more about 1 and 2?
Because 1 and 2 have easy explanations
7 does not
If 1 and 2 are satisfactorily explained, how is 7 a smoking gun? It's only a smoking gun if there's more evidence to point to the whole thing being an inside job.