lounge
Discord ID: 484514023698726912
1,016,926 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 284/10170
| Next
how do you know about the double slit exspeariment and not the uncertainty principle?
the point of the experement was done before we had an understanding of quantum theiry
but your asuming the interaction as a process is the cause not as an after fact; as in there is no phisical interaction but a logical interaction
@dumblebore ๐ You couldn't pay me to read the NYT
there is a physical interaction
the uncertainy principle says there is sets of complimary information, the most famous being speed and position, that the more you know about 1 the less you can know about the other
the act of measuring is applying an interaction onto the particle
but thats an assumption; unless you know the sensor lense is directly filtering and augmenting the partical how can you say.... nobody as ever even spoke about this X factor you say negates the whole thing... litterally dozens of scientists have spoken about this and non act like oh ya our sensor fucks with the light and creates this outcome....
A Law of quantum mechanics is that information cannot be created, duplicated or destroyed
the act of measuring without interacting will violate that law
but your asuming the product of interaction is the cause of what we see when it could just be a %2 decreese in speed or a 1% reflection of bounce etc idk but i don't think they'd use a sensor that is designed to produce the result they are trying to find inspite of adding interfearence
it'd be like me trying to test bullet proof glass and buying grenads....
it could but then quantum particles like a photon doesn't work like that
quantum particles have set states not a continuous spectrum
like spindown or spinup
if you had a larger chunk of particles like a baseball then that would apply
....your not getting what i'm saying here @ฮฃ5 unless you know the structure of the sensor you can't say its interaction is the product of what we see. When the entire point of the outcome was that the element of a "logical" innate observer changes the product of reality. if what your saying was true then all the papers etc would have nothing to do with any of those terms and it would just be "lense/sensory" shifts wave interferince pattern to scatter array.
because you are interacting still with a finite number of particles but a fraction of it
the reality doesn't change
It's like saying the reality changes when something exists
the sensor effects the wave function
nessesarily
it's a logical outcome of the equations
do me a favor and watch this.... i'm honestly at a point where i think your thinking from something else
#NoSpace #NeverEverEverExpanding
I know what the double slit experement is
It's explained by the equations
https://youtu.be/fwXQjRBLwsQ?t=220 watch for like 10 sec
the equations predict that the sensor modifies the wave function
I know what the double slit experement is.
It's explained by the equations.
the equations predict that the sensor modifies the wave function.
o god
not that
i remember the animation was horrifing
I coded my own quantum computer simulator and you think I don't understand this
@ฮฃ5 keeps saying **THE MATH** over and over again so it means nothing to his reality because somebody could make math about each aspect of it... sounds like he don't believe in anything beyond his own two hands
tell me this
@ฮฃ5 coding quantum computers isn't hard when they run on less then 2k byte's the hard part is finding meaningful output.... what kinda output you getting?
bits*
How much data can 32 quantum bits store
far to many
its like n^X*Z or something crazy its not linear like normal computers
@DrPeper Moden day pedos exist today in highly respected positions -
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2018/01/23/world/asia/afghanistan-military-abuse.amp.html
?
It's a gigabyte
i never said they didnt?
but what do you get out of your calculations/programs? any useful operations?
Hadamard
X
Y
Z
Tofoli gate
a few others
I can just add more by adding a matrix or a macro
but what applications do they fullfill, i know traffic prediction is one they use at google
it doesn't have the ability to have selective read operations yet
But I have the equations down for it in my head
it's a simulation
It has no use other than prototyping small code and teaching
wow sounds like your cutting edge on the tecknology that the creators can't even harness yet
It's extremely slow
?
I'm cutting edge on what?
many companies and schools already have much better quantum computer simulators than me
ya i know... i'm just calling out how you state I program quantum computers like your some kinda billgates.... relax that ego man that hard bound logic/reasoning is what drives you insane when you try to broaden the aspects of reality you seek to fathum.
@DrPeper You aksed when the "view" change... It never will - it's instilled in these third-world nations
I don't program quantum computers
?
I programmed a quantum computer simulator
it has, in the west
as in I modeled the qbits themselves in traditional code
and a 32 bit one at that... they are at/over nearly 512 and/or 2048
You can't simulate over 32 unless you get more than 32 GB of ram
was talking about the real ones
yes
And why do you bring it up when I'm coearoy talking about a simulation
also those large scale quantum computers are not working yet
because your simulating tecknology from nearly a decade ago
I don't see how this is relevant
exactly; so why not we work our way to something provoking in thought rather than coughing up facts; care to drop a half dozen or so topics you'd like to explore/expand
because I thought it would be fun to make a simulators for one day
your not even reading this right are you...
well good half dozen topics there; imma go to bed. peace
See ya
I'm not because it's not really worth it judging by the past responses you have
it's called inductive reasoning
Also I have the flu
shoo flu
๐
this guy
๐
@DrPeper ?
๐คท
It seems like there is some confusion on your part.
nope, just doing random things that are pointless
*doing
@DrPeper Oh. So whatโs your point? ๐
i am impulsive?
1,016,926 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 284/10170
| Next