It looks like this

how about gravity? eveything from space etc pretty much pushes onto our planet. air etc all get pushed to our center of mass right? soo looking at that space around us pushes us from all sides? right?

If you hear about a hypothesis had to be inserted, that’s called bullshit.

```
Make an observation.
Ask a question.
Form a hypothesis, or testable explanation.
Make a prediction based on the hypothesis.
Test the prediction.
Iterate: use the results to make new hypotheses or predictions.
```

Why's that bs

Do we need to hypothesize if we observe grass is green?

No.

We can already see it.

You can compare colour to this

Science is more complicated

The only reason a hypothesis was added, was because the original scientific method doesn’t agree with mainstream scientists.

Or it's because a lot of scientists agree that it works that way

You can't just start blindly following someone

A lot of scientists don’t agree with proof.

😮

Alright, @DoomCookie has been warned for '**Duplicated text**'.

Example?

<:smart:484956754489376781>

Is this proof?

no

<:butthurt:507983822244151306>

How can you prove the earth is flat anyways

By the scientific method.

And that is?

mmh

i have returned

Observation, measurement, and experiment.

However that doesnt prove its flat to me

Some methods could prove its a globe instead

So you don’t like proof?

Yes I do

But I haven't seen any proof of you

There are no proofs a sphere earth exists..

Neither a flat one

Alright, @Super_Trooper has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

thats depressing

Yes. There’s plenty of fe proof. Yet none for a ball earth.

i was serious tho lol

Are you sure?

Put NASA out of the image

Even is NASA was lying to you

The earth could still be a globe couldnt it

day 3.3
-Freedom at last.
-It seems the either the guards or mods had mercy.
-but on a serious note, thank you for letting me out again Mike.

A snow globe sure.

What about timezones?

Do they not exist?

Of course time zones exist. And they in actuality do not disprove fe.

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ

It's hard too prove

Due to no gravity

then why can't I see China from an elevated position in Germany, even with proper magnification

There’s always going to be atmosphere in the way, even on a flat earth.

so all countries have their own atmossphere?

@DoomCookie

that -- what @Derek Nelson said

and other things

including
https://prnt.sc/g1fy4g

..and
a multitude of other things (as well)

that's not how magnification works

.
and
ELEVATED? that only increases your viewing angle and distance

--and extends yyour physical view,,

Listen... i do think mars is round

every other planet is

alright then let's get on smaller scale, Germany to North African Coast Line

but the earth isnt

we are at the bottom of something and every other planet is above us

like a uhh fishbowl

proof that

well thats bullshit

Different kinds of round?

<:BigSmiles:556070613224259594>

Mars is not a physical object. At all..

proof that

Aka not terrestrial.

I already did.

yall keep makin claims without ever proving them

You went to mars

https://imgur.com/a/qSsqM3Z a nikon 900

But youre telling us that we make claims and dont prove em either

Alright, @Super_Trooper has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

https://imgur.com/a/geJ3Sgj a freaking telescope made to look millions of miles from it's position...

freaking... that's sad

<a:RareTyler:555789458004377611>

Can we see Mars as a physical object?

<a:acongablob:445017498832601089>

yes

Prove it.

yes as a tiny dot

we need a massive telescope to see it

or just get a small one

I can't since you don't believe in images. Just go to your clisest observatory and they'll show you

a freaking... nikon 900 are you kidding me thats horrible as "proof"

All you have are images to prove mars is terrestrial? No actual proof?

yet you believe the nikon

what if there's no mars at all

only bueno's