serious
Discord ID: 793519133177675802
1,898 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 3/19
| Next
Fuck Free Tradeeeeee
whats it say
Competitive advantage works up to a point but it doesn't scale to infinity like some people would like you to think
It doesn't work at all really
tl;dr wrong because full employment assumption, industry stripping, etc
@slavecaste What is the concept of "free trade" exactly?
The fact that we can trade globally without any tariffs and it'd be all good
So what is the problem with it?
Yes it does
In principle it works, specialisation and labour division increases efficiency
If there was no cost to transport or sell/buy goods (ie no tax, costs to enter market ect.) Then it would be fine
The reason it doesn't work is because of geopolitical concerns and unfactored costs
You can have that without free trade
There are way more reasons that it won't work that aren't even that
Because it doesn't work how theorized (wages fall, industries disappear, unemployment rises, etc)
Competitive advantage had nothing to do with free trade, I do not agree with the author combining the two. Unemployment may rise in the short term but will fall in the long term
And industries dissapering is not it "not working"
You would expect industries to dissaper
It only falls due to government stimulus, not free trade
That is not how it is theorized.
Yes it did? What? LOL
Inefficient industries wither away leaving only what is nessicary
Its an argument in favour of free trade but the concept is still sound without free trade
But the industries that do wither away are efficient, not inefficient.
No. Take coal in the UK for example
Yes.
Shit you're right
The concept is retarded even without free trade and to use it as a defense for free trade is shitbrain.
I disagree with Thatcher's methods but the coal mines were inefficient and the workers were holding the government hostage
That's good
No
Yea
Its good for coal mine workers
Its not good for the country as a whole
Ya
And?
Well the industry had become bloated and inefficient and could not survive without the government propping it up
We aren't talking about Britain first of all
We are talking about America
The concept of competitive advantage is a truism
Socialist countries practiced it
Fudal lords practiced it
I do not believe in free trade
Second of all once the government props up those industries again (either through nationalizing or bailing out) it doesn't become any more inefficient.
No it isn't
A government proping up an industry means it's inefficient
It assumes perfect competition
A government running an industry โ government proping up an industry
I believe that it isn't good but I don't think if the government props up a industry means it is any more inefficient.
They can prop it up through means of nationalizing
No they didn't LOL
'Ah yes, socialist countries had competition.'
The Soviet Union had special zones for specific production
And traded internally
They didn't have comparative advantage tho
Competitive advantage is a concept not a policy
Yeah and that concept doesn't apply to Socialism
Its like Darwinism, either you acknowledge it or you are wrong
'Darwinism is right'
Lol
Neo-Darwinian Tard here
I'm not here to argue the evolution vs the creation though
You aren't a creationist are you
I'm neither
Like an unironic "the earth is 6000 years old"
How is Darwinism right
Darwinism is correct because things that perpetuate themselves carry on and things that don't do not carry on
Natural Selection is false as well
Lamarckist in 2021
Darwin might have been wrong about some specifics but his general principles, which were known for millennium prior before Darwin gave explicit form to the implicit knowledge of the ages.
Why
Because he did
What do you mean why?
KKKope
My mood rn
Why is it right knowledge
Because Darwinism is not an ideology it is simply a material truth
Why is it truth
That which can perpetuate itself into the future will survive and that which cannot will perish
Ideas, civilisations, species. Whatever
but this is demonstrably false with our modern ages
How?
America
What about America?
trannies, fags, blacks are all at the top while whites are sinking and we know that those people can not perpetuate themselves into the future but are still not perished.
They will perish
Whites have obviously fucked up
yes but we are the only ones capable at perpetuating into the future in America
and they still aren't being weeded out as predicted by Darwin
They can perpetuate themselves via memetics
And they will eventually destroy themselves
Their horns grew too big because females selected the biggest hornes
Then the environment changed such that they couldn't eat enough to sustain the big hornes and the species died out
That's like America. They won't go extinct in one generation but they will destroy themselves
As Nietzsche pointed out genetics is only one way in which people perpetuate themselves
Memes (in their strictest sense) also perpetuate people (via their ideas) into the future
Ie transgenderism reproduces by memetic mind viruses
no they dont
1,898 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 3/19
| Next