With that wording

AIN = Actual Intellect Network? 😛

i beg to differ, that wording is catchy

Wew

thats what they do

catchy

it gets in your head

so you think, oh ya that ain thing

they said it was bad

It's a nice term because no one actually wants to be called "alt right" except Richard Spencer

Its not really, and you've missed the point

AIN just sounds like a dog trying to eat fast

Ain ain ain ain

lol

What's bad? Alternate influence

But everyoen wants to be an "alternative" to the mainstream media because the MSM is fucking garbage

Telling you what to think is our job

You know, the sentiment that got them into the shithouse in the first place

i cant believe it took this long of a paper for that study

seriously should have been like 2 pages

https://twitter.com/Timcast/status/1042171247075962880

Someone was telling me once that the Internet was founded in the first place to get fringe discussion into a space it's easier to monitor and control, to avoid a repeat of the Anti-Vietnam War movement.

And it wasn't just a response to the launch of SPutnik as the popular history goes

that is what every study is like

2-3 pages of actual info, 50 pages of just filler

2 pages of references

get em tim

Tim this isn't an academic paper. It's not journalism. There isn't any sort of standard to pass and as far as they're concerned there's nothing to correct because you belong on that hit list.

the man is blunt but he has a point

at best

maybe tim can get his name taken off

Why would they do that?

but there wont be any official announcement of the retraction

ya im just saying thats the best case

i dont think it will happen

Tim is a wrongthinker. He needs to go into the gulag until he learns how to love the party.

The left is responsible for making some of these people famous. Jordan Peterson would just be a really boring self-important professor who hucks self-help books, and Candice Owens was just a crazy SJW until she got on Zoe Quinn's bad side.

Proclaiming innocence confirms guilt.

thats a good point @Risotto

i didnt know who jordan peterson even was until recently when i started digging into all this crap

Dave Rubin was on TYT ffs.

Yeah

joe rogan being on that list is pretty insane too

he has EVERYONE on his show

yeah he should be bigger

agreed

And Bunty King is completely middle of the road normie-tier. Tim is an extremist compared to him.

ya also just as surprised at the names that didnt make the list as the ones that did

but that article graph, its all based on how much connection said person has to the others in it

so if you just hosted/are friends with more of the people on that list, you're more significant

regardless of what you say

I was talking about that in another channel, Rogan has Jimmy Dore, Tulsi Gabbard, he'd probably have a self-described communist on if they were interesting

but they got to break the lists up into sizable chunks

cant be rounding too many people up at once

I expected shoe0nhead to be there. She's friends with Bunty, Lauren, Roaming Millennial, Blair White, Chris Raygun, etc

He had Abby Martin on multiple times

list 2 will come out once they make headway into this list

And she's far left

courtesy of @Poppy Rider who set up the template

I am not sure this is even about making a hit list. I think it is more about trying to shut down revenue streams. All the other people missing would also be effected by such a move.

put that shit on reddit

List 2 will probably have someone like Jimmy Dore on it, TYT has already turned against him for being anti-Trump Derangement

@grant i hadnt thought about that

that is a really good point

so @Timcast if youtube/patreron screws with your subscriptions let everyone know so we can just start sending visa gift cards instead

People joke about having to make an alternative to Visa/Mastercard but maybe someday that's exactly what'll need to happen

waaaaay easier said than done

Yeah

i actually looked into that once, holy shit the redtape is insane

(just on a whim, not like i would be able to make it happen)

I actually think list 2 will be smaller and will be limited to people they can get away with (they'll remove the people they couldn't get away with this time). I suspect it more about getting their agents into positions to curate YouTube. Just like the ADL and SPLC are doing.

@grant you are def on point there. Alex jones was just the soft test too see if the government would do anything because of it

they will just start using the banhammer before too long, i have been saying oct all year

What is the nefarious end point of all this really though?

silencing descenting opinions

remove the wrongspeak

simple as that

Okay, so the far left removes everyone who isn't far left

Which means twitter is the new tumblr

i think tim said it best in a recent video

basically they will move the window until he counts as the far right

Right and once they do that they will have boxed themselves out of the rest of society

i don't think it will be bans I suspect it will be more subtle like shadow banning, demonitizing, and other ways of trying to hide stuff without outright banning. I also suspect they also want some kind of fake news tag to apply to all people who wrong speak

well, i found it interesting how youtube let up on the shadowbans

and they dont seem to have come back so far

i think they will not bother being so coy about it

they will just boot and move on

They haven't really shown themselves capable of subtlety tbh

the shadowban thing was pretty dubious

i think the only reason anyone found out about it was people leaking info

Shadow banning was discovered because they were doing it excessively

If someone posts a video and they normally get 50k views or whatever in a day, but now they only get 1000, they're going to know that something has happened.

Yup

UNLESS Youtube shows them fake stats.

Its not subtle to us. but the normies don't understand this stuff.

They'll just follow the larger trend regardless, but that being said a lot of them do know

If their video is demonetized and they've being shown fake stats how would they know that they're shadowbanned?

normies not just don't understand this stuff, but simply don't hear about it 😉

They wouldnt be getting the right amount of money?

what money? they'll just demonetize

Oh demonetized before

Well that's already an obvious attack on revenue and influence anyway

Demonetization is the default state of affairs for most political youtubers, so change in revenue wouldn't be a way to notice.