have you researched it?

Yeah

Its mostly synthetically made.

it's adrenalized blood

What was rhe first recorded writing of adrenochromem

False

whatever you say, buddy

you're always right, im sure

Aldous Huxley

So, you say that, but I could say the same for you

I'm sure that people researching for themselves will come to their own conclusions

You wouldn't believe anything I put out, regardless, because you *want* to believe this.

You're as bad as the flat earth community

i just don't want to argue about it.

Because you're uncomfortable that I'm attacking your worldview. Understandable

I could say the same to you, you're determined to not believe it

like i said, people can research for themselves

False. I never claimed that. I did research and my mind _changed_

don't need some rando on discord to tell them what is real and what isn't

Same goes for you bye bud

ok, bye

for anyone reading, you can research on your own. or not. I don't really care either way.

eh, obviously innocent until proven guilty, but its still suspicious going on Epstein's plane

yeah.

well that's the last time im mentioning adrenochrome on here, didn't know people were that sensitive about it.

interesting. i think i found the 1 article he got his views from.

@Meryl.140.15 It wasn't the adrenochrome. It was your logical incongruity: "[insert group of people] are dangerous therefore I dont care about them"

That way of thinking is asinine.

Now you're just trying to insult me simply because you don't agree with what I said

Go back and look at what I said.

Its there. Here's a screen shot

where was the nonexistent logic

That way of thinking can be applied to _literally_ anyone

It can be spun in literally any direction therefore it is illogical

what are you even talking about

and?

what part of that is illogical?

You're a lost cause.

ok

that's respectful of you.

i just realized that you weren't upset about the adrenochrome comment, you were upset by the pedophile comment. I was so confused for a while there.

i had just assumed it was the adrenochrome comment.

I did exactly that.

@Meryl.140.15 I thought I said it in enough of a way for you to understand my feelings towards your comments. I'm glad you understand me now. I just couldn't stand repeating the same thing, for a third time.

Tbats what wore me down the most

not sure how the pedophile comment was illogical or why it was upsetting at all tbh

that part still confuses me but everything else makes sense now

Because that same way of thinking can be applied to anybody.

I can say "people who lift weights are dangerous so I don't have sympathy for them."

"People that had no father, are dangerous, so I don't have sympathy for them."

It's a list of any qualifier that is infinitely long. Therefore, is a generalization, and therefore false.

Thats why it doesn't make sense to put people in that kind of box.

It would be better to say, "pedophiles that act out on their urges are dangerous..."
If what the people in the TED talk are saying, is true, then yeah, try and get people the help they need, don't just throw them to the wayside. It can't be all of them.

pedophiles are dangerous.

since when are weight lifters and pedophiles equivalent

i mean some pedophiles might be weight lifters

okay, i agree with both of you. generalizing people is bad, and not a strong argument, but pedophiles in general are bad and dangerous. @kriegor191 isnt trying to argue that pedophiles are good/safe people, kriegor is trying to argue that using that argument isnt strong and shouldnt be used if you want to make a good point, @Meryl.140.15. does that make sense/accurately describe whats going on here?

it's not really an argument that's just my view on it

I just, can't. No harm no foul, @Meryl.140.15 but I cant explain it any better than @Wardog did.

alright, im not trying to put words in anybody's mouth, and im not trying to twist either of your views or what youre saying, im just trying to find some common understanding about WHY this argument is happening, since it escalated earlier.

And now my Bluetooth isn't working

I've explained my position from the get go, it hasn't changed.

we just won't agree on this subject and that's fine.

No, we wont.

find it odd that someone would start being insulting to someone for saying "pedophiles are dangerous" but i guess ill never understand that

I guess "X is dangerous and therefore unworthy of anything" is a fine point to make.

i didn't say unworthy, that's adding words

I wasn't insulting. If you thought I was, then I'm sorry you feel that way.

I was just using your logic against you.

Meryl, youre missing the point, and kriegor, please keep calm.

its fine if you hold that view, what kriegor was trying to say was its not a strong or justifiable view.

he was trying to show the fallacy in it, not that you were necessarily wrong, or he disagrees with the fact pedophiles are bad.

No Meryl is right, their sympathy isn't worth spending on people who they deem is dangerous.

Which, could just be, _anybody_ at _any_ time.

okay. then theres no reason to continue the argument. whats done is done, you guys hopefully have made your sides clear.

wonder how many pedos are out there that don't succumb to their urges at some point in their life

We'll never know, which is the point of the TED talk

well, pedophiles are dangerous.

Or at least, a point.

At some point, so were _all_ homosexuals.

I am definitely not attracted to the same gender @kriegor191

And I strongly disagree with pedophiles being considered normal

I agree with @Lore. An underage child cannot comprehend enough to consent.

and I AM attracted to the same gender. I cannot imagine taking someone's innocence away.

they essentially destroy the person's life before it really even gets to begin

I have no problem with other people’s orientation as long as it does not include children

I do worry that the left will normalize it.

Children should be allowed to grow up and make their own decisions about their personal orientation

they ahve already started to normalize it

I'd even say that a good amount of colleges goers these days don't comprehend the world enough to really know what they're consenting to

like those trans people who go to public libraries, videos that come from that are so disgusting

twerking for little kids

I know what you mean @Meryl.140.15

hell, I think the voting age needs to raise to 21... at least

our brains aren't fully developed until 25

a lot of growing happens in our 20's

i think voter rights should be restricted to those that pass a course in civics

too many idiots and fools voting with no understanding of civics

if the voting age goes up too 21, then people shouldnt be considered legal adults at 18, enlistment age needs to be increased to 21, and we have to figure out what people can do after those 3 years after high school before theyre considered adults