Because you're uncomfortable that I'm attacking your worldview. Understandable

I could say the same to you, you're determined to not believe it

like i said, people can research for themselves

False. I never claimed that. I did research and my mind _changed_

don't need some rando on discord to tell them what is real and what isn't

Same goes for you bye bud

ok, bye

for anyone reading, you can research on your own. or not. I don't really care either way.

eh, obviously innocent until proven guilty, but its still suspicious going on Epstein's plane

yeah.

well that's the last time im mentioning adrenochrome on here, didn't know people were that sensitive about it.

interesting. i think i found the 1 article he got his views from.

@Meryl.140.15 It wasn't the adrenochrome. It was your logical incongruity: "[insert group of people] are dangerous therefore I dont care about them"

That way of thinking is asinine.

Now you're just trying to insult me simply because you don't agree with what I said

Go back and look at what I said.

Its there. Here's a screen shot

where was the nonexistent logic

That way of thinking can be applied to _literally_ anyone

It can be spun in literally any direction therefore it is illogical

what are you even talking about

and?

what part of that is illogical?

You're a lost cause.

ok

that's respectful of you.

i just realized that you weren't upset about the adrenochrome comment, you were upset by the pedophile comment. I was so confused for a while there.

i had just assumed it was the adrenochrome comment.

I did exactly that.

@Meryl.140.15 I thought I said it in enough of a way for you to understand my feelings towards your comments. I'm glad you understand me now. I just couldn't stand repeating the same thing, for a third time.

Tbats what wore me down the most

not sure how the pedophile comment was illogical or why it was upsetting at all tbh

that part still confuses me but everything else makes sense now

Because that same way of thinking can be applied to anybody.

I can say "people who lift weights are dangerous so I don't have sympathy for them."

"People that had no father, are dangerous, so I don't have sympathy for them."

It's a list of any qualifier that is infinitely long. Therefore, is a generalization, and therefore false.

Thats why it doesn't make sense to put people in that kind of box.

It would be better to say, "pedophiles that act out on their urges are dangerous..."
If what the people in the TED talk are saying, is true, then yeah, try and get people the help they need, don't just throw them to the wayside. It can't be all of them.

pedophiles are dangerous.