๐Ÿ’ช๏ฝœmilitary-war

Discord ID: 722683196373991506


10,733 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 2/108 | Next

2020-06-20 19:23:15 UTC

Probably the best time to. But I'll be waiting.

2020-06-20 20:07:57 UTC

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/722683196373991506/723992560430743632/Screenshot_20200620-151653_Instagram.jpg

2020-06-20 23:01:29 UTC

20 Indians are dead and 45 Chinese are killed or wounded

2020-06-20 23:02:13 UTC

not our problem, we should stay out of it. we have our own problem rn

2020-06-20 23:02:23 UTC

^

2020-06-20 23:02:29 UTC

I couldnโ€™t agree more

2020-06-20 23:02:50 UTC

However, we should at least passively help India

2020-06-20 23:04:13 UTC

im not saying anything against china on social media, i think they are great lol

2020-06-20 23:10:14 UTC

Lol

2020-06-21 00:16:17 UTC

Trump has said he is ready to help with the issue..But both our government and china aren't willing to take it.

2020-06-21 03:16:07 UTC

Corona was the filler to let the manga catch up for the ww3 story arch to continue

2020-06-21 06:18:45 UTC

Millions unemployed, woman and lgtbq can now enlist, immigrant kids can get green cards if they serve... demographics and all tension with China is looking prime for WWIII. At very least a draft

2020-06-21 07:36:34 UTC

Nahhh. They will all go the way of goose. No worries.

2020-06-21 09:53:04 UTC

What's the point in a draft? 2 superpowers go to war and it's whoever presses big red button first

2020-06-21 09:53:25 UTC

Nobody is going to be in trenches for months that's for sure

2020-06-21 09:53:42 UTC

Yea

2020-06-21 09:54:50 UTC

Even if it's not instant nukes which are 10,000 times stronger than Hiroshima or whatever, it'll be drones and missiles targeted at major government bases either in China or America, and with other countries involved it'll be resolved quickly at least

2020-06-21 09:55:03 UTC

Even if we're all mutants in the outcome

2020-06-21 13:04:59 UTC

My buddy is an engineer in the DOD- he says bring it on, China. If it flies- it dies

2020-06-21 13:09:22 UTC

Wdym

2020-06-21 18:59:25 UTC

No one would use nukes because of MAD, unless they were desperate

2020-06-21 19:03:52 UTC

As for China, you can block off their ocean trade. That will lower their GDP perhaps causing a revolt

2020-06-21 19:04:31 UTC

If it can get done like how the trade federation blockaded Naboo๐Ÿ˜‚

2020-06-21 19:07:03 UTC

But china has a good navy

2020-06-21 19:07:17 UTC

Naboo didnt have shit

2020-06-21 19:07:50 UTC

Trust me they are far behind us

2020-06-21 19:08:35 UTC

But of course they do discuss their missle defences, even that is open to scrutiny as to the quality of these etc

2020-06-21 19:08:41 UTC

They r like 3rd best after usa and russia

2020-06-21 19:09:02 UTC

Even tho korea can fend them off

2020-06-21 19:09:12 UTC

Exactly. The gap is massive

2020-06-21 19:12:39 UTC

And for them is numbers, which is the intimidation factor

2020-06-21 19:13:11 UTC

Of course if you see alot you will naturally be like ah shit๐Ÿ˜…

2020-06-21 19:18:19 UTC

China just doesnโ€™t have experience

2020-06-21 19:18:44 UTC

And a lot of nations in the South China Sea are starting to fight back such as Vietnam and the Philippines

2020-06-21 19:19:02 UTC

China couldn't even take a worn out Vietnam

2020-06-21 19:19:19 UTC

After they beat off the French and had it out with America for 18 years

2020-06-21 19:20:22 UTC

I have seen bits of their training, jumping through fire hoops and all

2020-06-21 19:20:30 UTC

The battlefield is not a god damn circus

2020-06-21 19:21:04 UTC

Almost every country dislikes China, especially their neighbors

2020-06-21 19:21:36 UTC

You can't end up at the top without good friends

2020-06-21 19:26:46 UTC

True

2020-06-21 21:14:57 UTC

China has a good navy? What tv show you watching? They are laughable when compared with the US navy

2020-06-21 21:16:57 UTC

Dont underestimate them

2020-06-21 21:17:20 UTC

You wont defeat china just by defeating their navy

2020-06-21 21:17:31 UTC

And those guys are fanatics

2020-06-21 21:22:16 UTC

Even if you successfully occupy china there will be an insurgency

2020-06-21 21:22:31 UTC

And thats hard

2020-06-21 21:23:21 UTC

Not to mention the fact that chinese and us carriers will be the 1st ones at the bottom of the pacific if this shit happens

2020-06-21 21:23:34 UTC

Because they will go for carriers first

2020-06-21 21:23:35 UTC

Yup

2020-06-21 21:23:52 UTC

And there's nothing that can stop the amount of rockets and misses shot at em

2020-06-21 21:23:59 UTC

Basically if you underestimate your enemy you lose

2020-06-21 21:24:01 UTC

Its MAD

2020-06-21 21:24:16 UTC

Overestimate your enemy and you win

2020-06-21 21:25:27 UTC

Know thyself you will half your battles, know your yourself and your enemy you will be undefeated

2020-06-21 21:25:42 UTC

Yes

2020-06-21 21:25:43 UTC

overestimating is just as bad as underestimating

2020-06-21 21:26:52 UTC

Well no

2020-06-21 21:27:10 UTC

Bring 100 tanks to destroy 1

2020-06-21 21:27:16 UTC

Who wins?

2020-06-21 21:27:38 UTC

While the enemy bums you elsewhere๐Ÿ˜ where those 100 tanks could of been better used

2020-06-21 21:27:39 UTC

Depends

2020-06-21 21:27:47 UTC

100 Sherman's vs 1 abram

2020-06-21 21:27:55 UTC

Abram will win

2020-06-21 21:28:01 UTC

No tank has 100 shells

2020-06-21 21:28:12 UTC

Do they?

2020-06-21 21:28:32 UTC

Doesn't matter. The 100 tanks shells can't penetrate the armor of an abrams

2020-06-21 21:29:11 UTC

So...

2020-06-21 21:29:38 UTC

We would be stupid to try and annex china if we ever did go to war with them

2020-06-21 21:29:40 UTC

Abrams will have to run

2020-06-21 21:29:54 UTC

a land war would be a no go

2020-06-21 21:30:16 UTC

Theres no point

2020-06-21 21:30:19 UTC

MAD

2020-06-21 21:30:34 UTC

MAD

2020-06-21 21:30:46 UTC

Exactly why we haven't wared with Russia, China etc...

2020-06-21 21:30:53 UTC

Btw check out the aviation thread

2020-06-21 21:31:02 UTC

I made a new b 52 variant

2020-06-21 21:31:16 UTC

yep. It would basically be a war of flexing power tbh. they wouldnt be crazy enough to invade us, and vice versa

2020-06-21 21:31:24 UTC

Yeah

2020-06-21 21:31:45 UTC

its only the cities that need to be dealt with along their coast

2020-06-21 21:32:41 UTC

But russia brings up a good point. Even if we take the cities, we still have a massive insurgency to deal with. Plus we have a distinct disadvantage there, as we have no supply lines. And if we did, they would be to coastal cities, so most in-country cities are off the table

2020-06-21 21:32:47 UTC

we simply wouldnt be able to reinforce them

2020-06-21 21:32:56 UTC

Germany tried

2020-06-21 21:33:01 UTC

They failed

2020-06-21 21:33:05 UTC

France tried

2020-06-21 21:33:08 UTC

They failed

2020-06-21 21:33:14 UTC

and they had the benefit of surprise.

2020-06-21 21:33:20 UTC

we most certainly wouldnt lol

2020-06-21 21:33:32 UTC

Big power arrogance gets to us all

2020-06-21 21:33:42 UTC

But china will defend those coastal cities like fanatics

2020-06-21 21:33:43 UTC

esp with today's technology, theyd see us coming a week away

2020-06-21 21:33:48 UTC

difference is with China is they got to their pedestal in 60 years with alot of our help

2020-06-21 21:33:58 UTC

other nations organically grew over hundreds of years

2020-06-21 21:34:15 UTC

With alliances etc

2020-06-21 21:34:23 UTC

yea. i think someone mentioned it earlier. Economics is the way to ruin china. Cut them off completely from trade.

2020-06-21 21:34:35 UTC

I guess so

2020-06-21 21:34:44 UTC

But they r big

2020-06-21 21:34:51 UTC

Exactly, the CCP pride themselves on 6% GDP growth

2020-06-21 21:34:53 UTC

yea, but big countries need alot of resources.

2020-06-21 21:34:57 UTC

though we know that is bullshit now

10,733 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 2/108 | Next